Jingjing Miao1,2, Weiwei Xiao2, Lin Wang1, Fei Han2, Haijun Wu1, Xiaowu Deng2, Xiang Guo3, Chong Zhao4,5. 1. Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. guoxiang@sysucc.org.cn. 4. Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. gzzhaochong@hotmail.com. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. gzzhaochong@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in predicting prognoses and guiding treatment choices of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: The 539 patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC were retrospectively analysed. The PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). All patients were split randomly into a training set and a testing set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cut-off value of PNI and test its prognostic validity. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with log-rank test. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 109.5 months. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 90.6, 85.8, 85.3 and 82.7%, respectively. The PNI cut-off value was 52.0 in the training set, which was significant in predicting DMFS, DSS and OS in the testing set. According to the PNI cut-off value, 220 patients of II-IVb stage treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were classified into PNI ≤ 52.0 and >52.0 groups and the 5-year LRRFS, DMFS, DSS, and OS of PNI ≤ 52.0 group were significantly worse than the PNI > 52.0 group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the PNI is a reliable independent prognostic factor in NPC patients treated with IMRT. For stage II-IVb patients with PNI ≤ 52.0, CCRT alone does not achieve satisfactory outcomes, and further studies on treatment optimization are needed.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in predicting prognoses and guiding treatment choices of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: The 539 patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC were retrospectively analysed. The PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). All patients were split randomly into a training set and a testing set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cut-off value of PNI and test its prognostic validity. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with log-rank test. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 109.5 months. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 90.6, 85.8, 85.3 and 82.7%, respectively. The PNI cut-off value was 52.0 in the training set, which was significant in predicting DMFS, DSS and OS in the testing set. According to the PNI cut-off value, 220 patients of II-IVb stage treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were classified into PNI ≤ 52.0 and >52.0 groups and the 5-year LRRFS, DMFS, DSS, and OS of PNI ≤ 52.0 group were significantly worse than the PNI > 52.0 group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the PNI is a reliable independent prognostic factor in NPCpatients treated with IMRT. For stage II-IVb patients with PNI ≤ 52.0, CCRT alone does not achieve satisfactory outcomes, and further studies on treatment optimization are needed.
Authors: Anne W M Lee; Wai Tong Ng; Lucy L K Chan; Wai Man Hung; Connie C C Chan; Henry C K Sze; Oscar S H Chan; Amy T Y Chang; Rebecca M W Yeung Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Nan Jiang; Jing-Yu Deng; Xue-Wei Ding; Bin Ke; Ning Liu; Ru-Peng Zhang; Han Liang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Zhong-Guo Liang; Fan Zhang; Bin-Bin Yu; Ling Li; Song Qu; Ye Li; Ying Guan; Ren-Ba Liang; Lu Han; Xiao-Dong Zhu Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 3.989