Literature DB >> 28246969

Spatial orienting of attention to social cues is modulated by cue type and gender of viewer.

Sarah Maeve Cooney1, Nuala Brady2, Katie Ryan2.   

Abstract

Across three experiments, we examined the efficacy of three cues from the human body-body orientation, head turning, and eye-gaze direction-to shift an observer's attention in space. Using a modified Posner cueing paradigm, we replicate the previous findings of gender differences in the gaze-cueing effect whereby female but not male participants responded significantly faster to validly cued than to invalidly cued targets. In contrast to the previous studies, we report a robust cueing effect for both male and female participants when head turning direction was used as the central cue, whereas oriented bodies proved ineffectual as cues to attention for both males and females. These results are discussed with reference to the time course of central cueing effects, gender differences in spatial attention, and current models of how cues from the human body are combined to judge another person's direction of attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cueing effect; Gender; Social cues; Spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246969     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4909-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  The extreme male brain theory of autism.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; J K Hietanen; M W Oram; P J Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of social attention.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The new statistics: why and how.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-12

6.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention.

Authors:  Andrew P Bayliss; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-05

9.  Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Stephen V Shepherd; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The Effect of Head Orientation on Perceived Gaze Direction: Revisiting Gibson and Pick (1963) and Cline (1967).

Authors:  Pieter Moors; Karl Verfaillie; Thalia Daems; Iwona Pomianowska; Filip Germeys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Motion or sociality? The cueing effect and temporal course of autistic traits on gaze-triggered attention.

Authors:  Zhiyun Wang; Bin Xuan; Shuo Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Implicit Mentalising during Level-1 Visual Perspective-Taking Indicated by Dissociation with Attention Orienting.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Aiste P Bileviciute; Caroline J Edmonds
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-20

3.  Impact of instructor on-slide presence in synchronous e-learning.

Authors:  Zoltan Katai; David Iclanzan
Journal:  Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-09-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.