| Literature DB >> 28245788 |
Man Ling Chau1, Kyaw Thu Aung1, Hapuarachchige Chanditha Hapuarachchi1, Pei Sze Valarie Lee2, Pei Ying Lim3, Joanne Su Lin Kang1, Youming Ng1, Hooi Ming Yap1, Hyun-Gyun Yuk2, Ramona Alikiiteaga Gutiérrez4, Lee Ching Ng5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the preparation of salads involves extensive handling and the use of uncooked ingredients, they are particularly vulnerable to microbial contamination. This study aimed to determine the microbial safety and quality of pre-packed salads and salad bar ingredients sold in Singapore, so as to identify public health risks that could arise from consuming salads and to determine areas for improvement in the management of food safety.Entities:
Keywords: Food safety; Listeria monocytogenes; Microbial safety and quality; Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST); Salads; Smoked salmon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28245788 PMCID: PMC5331722 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-0956-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Prevalence of foodborne bacteria in pre-packed salads, salad bar ingredients and smoked salmon samples collected between September 2011 and September 2012 (phases I and II)
| Percentage (%) of positive samples (Range of bacterial counts detected in positive samples, log CFU/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Salad bar ingredients | ||||
| Seafood | 44.1% (15/34) | 2.9% (1/34) | 2.9% (1/34) | 0% (0/34) |
| (2.0 log CFU/g) | (3.4 log CFU/g) | |||
| Poultry & eggs | 0% (0/32) | 6.3% (2/32) | 6.3% (2/32) | 3.1% (1/32) |
| (2.7 log CFU/g) | (1.6 – 1.8 log CFU/g) | (1.9 log CFU/g) | ||
| Dressing | 0% (0/34) | 2.9% (1/34) | 0% (0/34) | 0% (0/34) |
| (2.3 log CFU/g) | ||||
| Pasta, rice & couscous | 0% (0/34) | 0% (0/34) | 5.9% (2/34) | 0% (0/34) |
| (2.0 – 2.5 CFU/g) | ||||
| Vegetable | 0% (0/33) | 0% (0/33) | 0% (0/33) | 6.1% (2/33) |
| (3.2 log CFU/g) | ||||
| Cheese | 0% (0/31) | 0% (0/31) | 0% (0/31) | 0% (0/31) |
| Pre-packed salads | ||||
| Pasta, rice& couscous salads | 0% (0/30) | 33.3% (10/30) | 0% (0/30) | 0% (0/30) |
| (2.0 – 2.7 log CFU/g) | ||||
| Vegetable salads | 0% (0/44) | 15.9% (7/44) | 2.3% (1/44) | 0% (0/44) |
| (2.0 – 3.6 log CFU/g) | (1.7 log CFU/g) | |||
| Chicken salads | 6.3% (2/32) | 3.1% (1/32) | 3.1% (1/32) | 0% (0/32) |
| (2.0 log CFU/g) | (1.0 log CFU/g) | |||
| Pre-packed dressing | 0% (0/37) | 0% (0/37) | 0% (0/37) | 0% (0/37) |
| Smoked salmon | ||||
| Unsealed items displayed at salad barsa | 86.7% (13/15) | 6.7% (1/15) | 0% (0/15) | 0% (0/15) |
| (<1.0 – 4.9 log CFU/g)b | (2.5 log CFU/g) | |||
| Pre-packed items at Supermarkets | 21.6% (37/171) | 1.8% (3/171) | 0% (0/171) | 0% (0/171) |
| (<1.0 – 5.4 log CFU/g)c | (2.5 – 3.4 log CFU/g) | |||
a A subset of seafood ingredients sold at salad bars
b L. monocytogenes counts were determined in 7 of the 13 positive samples, median count = 3.5 log CFU/g
c L. monocytogenes counts were determined in 34 of the 37 positive samples, median count = 3.1 log CFU/g
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree using the Neighbour-Joining (NJ) method based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of seven MLST house-keeping genes of 16 Sequence Types (ST) of 64 L. monocytogenes isolates recovered from salad and smoked salmon samples collected between September 2011 and October 2012 (phases I & II). Bootstrap values of >70% are shown on the branches and are calculated from 1,000 replicates. The horizontal scale bar of 0.005 represents nucleotide substitution rate per site. *Novel sequence types determined in this study (http://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria/) a Isolates were recovered from smoked salmon samples unless specified. Isolates were recovered from ba chilled cooked prawn sample, ca chilled cooked shrimp sample and dpre-packed chicken salad samples. dA total of 31 isolates were recovered from 24 samples of Brand A’s pre-packed smoked salmon. Six samples were found positive with two different L. monocytogenes STs. These include the co-detection of ST2 and ST1218 in two samples; the co-detection of ST2 and ST1220, ST2 and ST1221, ST1220 and ST1222, as well as ST87 and ST1223 in one sample respectively
Fig. 2Standard Plate Count (SPC) of pre-packed salads and salad bar ingredients. NS: The difference in SPC was not significant (p > 0.05). *: The difference in SPC was significant (p < 0.05). **: The difference in SPC was significant (p < 0.005). ***: The difference in SPC was significant (p < 0.001). Outliers. ---: Singapore’s regulatory limit for SPC in ready-to-eat food (<5 log CFU/g) [37]