| Literature DB >> 28244687 |
Renfu Quan1, Weibin Du1, Xuan Zheng1, Shichao Xu1, Qiang Li1, Xing Ji2, Ximei Wu2, Rongxue Shao3, Disheng Yang4.
Abstract
Within the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of five subtypes, VEGF165 secreted by endothelial cells has been identified to be the most active and widely distributed factor that plays a vital role in courses of angiogenesis, vascularization and mesenchymal cell differentiation. Hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) can be harvested from the bulge region of the outer root sheath of the hair follicle and are adult stem cells that have multi-directional differentiation potential. Although the research on differentiation of stem cells (such as fat stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells) to the endothelial cells has been extensive, but the various mechanisms and functional forms are unclear. In particular, study on HFSCs' directional differentiation into vascular endothelial cells using VEGF165 has not been reported. In this study, VEGF165 was used as induction factor to induce the differentiation from HFSCs into vascular endothelial cells, and the results showed that Notch signalling pathway might affect the differentiation efficiency of vascular endothelial cells. In addition, the in vivo transplantation experiment provided that HFSCs could promote angiogenesis, and the main function is to accelerate host-derived neovascularization. Therefore, HFSCs could be considered as an ideal cell source for vascular tissue engineering and cell transplantation in the treatment of ischaemic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: VEGF165; hair follicle stem cells; inducible factor; tissue engineering; vascular endothelial cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28244687 PMCID: PMC5542910 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Primers for polymerase chain reaction analysis
| Gene | Primers sequences(5′–3′) | Fragment size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| CD31 | Forward: GAAATGGTGCTTCGGTGCTC | 108 |
| Reverse: GGTGTCATTCACGGTTTCTTCG | ||
| VE‐cadherin | Forward: ATGAGGTCGGTGCCCGTATT | 138 |
| Reverse: CGTTGGTCTTGGGGTCTGTGA | ||
| GAPDH | Forward: TGCTATGTTGCCCTAGACTTCG | 240 |
| Reverse: GTTGGCATAGAGGTCTTTACGG |
Figure 1rHFSCs primary cells culture (×100) (A). The third‐generation cells after purified once (×100) (B) and flow cytometry detection of characteristic rHFSCs markers (C).
Figure 2rHFSCs characteristic markers immunofluorescence staining (×63) (A). The growth curve of cells at different generations (B) and passages of the rHFSCs (C).
Figure 3Flow cytometry detection of characteristic ECs markers (A), ECs characteristic markers immunofluorescence staining (×63) (B), observation of cell internal structure and W‐P corpuscle after induction (C) and the results of the two groups of cells bureaucratic form after 6 hrs (×40) (D).
Comparison of numbers of tubes and nodes in Matrigel between pre‐ and post‐induction groups ( ± s)
| Group | No. of tubes | No. of nodes |
|---|---|---|
| Before induction | 5.3 ± 1.12 | 3.4 ± 1.04 |
| After induction | 23.5 ± 1.321 | 21.2 ± 1.541 |
1 P < 0.05, compared with the control group.
Figure 4Protein expression of CD31 and VE‐cadherin in each group (A), grey value comparison of Western blot in each group (B), CD31 and VE‐cadherin mRNA levels comparison in each group (C) and Dil‐ac‐LDL phagocytosis assay in each group (×40) (D).
Figure 5Gross appearance of three samples (A), and chemical testing of three Matrigel samples (On: HE staining, Below: CD31 immunohistochemistry; a: Epidermal area, b: Matrigel area) (B and C).
Figure 6CD31 immunofluorescence of Matrigel in Group C (A), and three‐dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels and rHFSCsGFP in group C Matrigel sample (B).