Vivek P Gupta1, Andrew L A Garton2, Jonathan A Sisti2, Brandon R Christophe3, Aaron S Lord4, Ariane K Lewis4, Hans-Peter Frey5, Jan Claassen5, E Sander Connolly3. 1. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA. Electronic address: sean.vivek.gupta@gmail.com. 2. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA. 4. Division of Neurocritical Care NYU Langone Medical Center, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, New York, USA. 5. Division of Critical Care Neurology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The morbidity, mortality, and monetary cost associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is devastatingly high. Several scoring systems have been proposed to prognosticate outcomes after ICH, although the original ICH Score is still the most widely used. However, recent research suggests that systemic physiologic factors, such as those included in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, may also influence outcome. In addition, no scoring systems to date have included premorbid functional status. Therefore, we propose a scoring system that incorporates these factors to prognosticate 3-month and 12-month functional outcomes. METHODS: We used the Random Forest machine-learning technique to identify factors from a dataset of more than 200 data points per patient that were most strongly affiliated with functional outcome. We then used linear regression to create an initial model based on these factors and modified weightings to improve accuracy. Our scoring system was compared with the ICH Score for prognosticating functional outcomes. RESULTS: Two separate scoring systems (Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes Project 3 [ICHOP3] and ICHOP12) were developed for 3-month and 12-month functional outcomes using Glasgow Coma Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and hematoma volume (3-month only). Patient outcomes were dichotomized into good (mRS score, 0-3) and poor (mRS score, 4-6) categories based on functional status. Areas under the curve in the derivation cohort for predicting mRS score were 0.89 (3-month) and 0.87 (12-month); both were significantly more discriminatory than the original ICH Score. CONCLUSIONS: The ICHOP scores may provide more comprehensive evaluation of a patient's long-term functional prognosis by taking into account systemic physiologic factors as well as premorbid functional status.
BACKGROUND: The morbidity, mortality, and monetary cost associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is devastatingly high. Several scoring systems have been proposed to prognosticate outcomes after ICH, although the original ICH Score is still the most widely used. However, recent research suggests that systemic physiologic factors, such as those included in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, may also influence outcome. In addition, no scoring systems to date have included premorbid functional status. Therefore, we propose a scoring system that incorporates these factors to prognosticate 3-month and 12-month functional outcomes. METHODS: We used the Random Forest machine-learning technique to identify factors from a dataset of more than 200 data points per patient that were most strongly affiliated with functional outcome. We then used linear regression to create an initial model based on these factors and modified weightings to improve accuracy. Our scoring system was compared with the ICH Score for prognosticating functional outcomes. RESULTS: Two separate scoring systems (Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes Project 3 [ICHOP3] and ICHOP12) were developed for 3-month and 12-month functional outcomes using Glasgow Coma Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and hematoma volume (3-month only). Patient outcomes were dichotomized into good (mRS score, 0-3) and poor (mRS score, 4-6) categories based on functional status. Areas under the curve in the derivation cohort for predicting mRS score were 0.89 (3-month) and 0.87 (12-month); both were significantly more discriminatory than the original ICH Score. CONCLUSIONS: The ICHOP scores may provide more comprehensive evaluation of a patient's long-term functional prognosis by taking into account systemic physiologic factors as well as premorbid functional status.
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Melissa A LoPresti; Samuel S Bruce; Elvis Camacho; Sudkir Kunchala; Byron G Dubois; Eliza Bruce; Geoff Appelboom; E Sander Connolly Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Jan Claassen; An Vu; Kurt T Kreiter; Robert G Kowalski; Evelyn Y Du; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Brian-Fred M Fitzsimmons; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Katja E Wartenberg; David Y Hwang; Karl Georg Haeusler; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Oliver W Sakowitz; Dominik Madžar; Hajo M Hamer; Alejandro A Rabinstein; David M Greer; J Claude Hemphill; Juergen Meixensberger; Panayiotis N Varelas Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Nazife Dinc; Sae-Yeon Won; Nina Brawanski; Michael Eibach; Johanna Quick-Weller; Jürgen Konczalla; Joachim Berkefeld; Volker Seifert; Gerhard Marquardt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jens Witsch; Bob Siegerink; Christian H Nolte; Maximilian Sprügel; Thorsten Steiner; Matthias Endres; Hagen B Huttner Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Laura C Miyares; Guido J Falcone; Audrey Leasure; Opeolu Adeoye; Fu-Dong Shi; Steven J Kittner; Carl Langefeld; Achala Vagal; Kevin N Sheth; Daniel Woo Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Nizam Uddin Ahamed; Dylan Kobsar; Lauren Benson; Christian Clermont; Russell Kohrs; Sean T Osis; Reed Ferber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240