Literature DB >> 28242315

Individual differences and time-varying features of modular brain architecture.

Xuhong Liao1, Miao Cao1, Mingrui Xia1, Yong He2.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that human brain functional networks are topologically organized into functionally specialized but inter-connected modules to facilitate efficient information processing and highly flexible cognitive function. However, these studies have mainly focused on group-level network modularity analyses using "static" functional connectivity approaches. How these extraordinary modular brain structures vary across individuals and spontaneously reconfigure over time remain largely unknown. Here, we employed multiband resting-state functional MRI data (N=105) from the Human Connectome Project and a graph-based modularity analysis to systematically investigate individual variability and dynamic properties in modular brain networks. We showed that the modular structures of brain networks dramatically vary across individuals, with higher modular variability primarily in the association cortex (e.g., fronto-parietal and attention systems) and lower variability in the primary systems. Moreover, brain regions spontaneously changed their module affiliations on a temporal scale of seconds, which cannot be simply attributable to head motion and sampling error. Interestingly, the spatial pattern of intra-subject dynamic modular variability largely overlapped with that of inter-subject modular variability, both of which were highly reproducible across repeated scanning sessions. Finally, the regions with remarkable individual/temporal modular variability were closely associated with network connectors and the number of cognitive components, suggesting a potential contribution to information integration and flexible cognitive function. Collectively, our findings highlight individual modular variability and the notable dynamic characteristics in large-scale brain networks, which enhance our understanding of the neural substrates underlying individual differences in a variety of cognition and behaviors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Association cortex; Connectomics; Connector; Dynamics; Graph theory; Modularity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242315     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Development and Emergence of Individual Variability in the Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Preterm Human Brain.

Authors:  Yuehua Xu; Miao Cao; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Xindi Wang; Tina Jeon; Minhui Ouyang; Lina Chalak; Nancy Rollins; Hao Huang; Yong He
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; Benjamin R Geib; Rachel E Siciliano; Lauren E Packard; Catherine W Tallman; David J Madden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Yong He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Longitudinal Changes in the Cerebral Cortex Functional Organization of Healthy Elderly.

Authors:  Joanna Su Xian Chong; Kwun Kei Ng; Jesisca Tandi; Chenhao Wang; Jia-Hou Poh; June C Lo; Michael W L Chee; Juan Helen Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatiotemporal, metabolic, and therapeutic characterization of altered functional connectivity in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jintao Sheng; Yuedi Shen; Yanhua Qin; Lei Zhang; Binjia Jiang; Yaoyao Li; Luoyi Xu; Wei Chen; Jinhui Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Schizophrenia with Magnetoencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Do Different Timescales Tell a Different Story?

Authors:  Lori Sanfratello; Jon M Houck; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2019-04

7.  Investigating the effects of healthy cognitive aging on brain functional connectivity using 4.7 T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stanislau Hrybouski; Ivor Cribben; John McGonigle; Fraser Olsen; Rawle Carter; Peter Seres; Christopher R Madan; Nikolai V Malykhin
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 8.  Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics.

Authors:  Ankit N Khambhati; Ann E Sizemore; Richard F Betzel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Perry Zurn; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Static and dynamic connectomics differentiate between depressed patients with and without suicidal ideation.

Authors:  Wei Liao; Jiao Li; Xujun Duan; Qian Cui; Heng Chen; Huafu Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.