Literature DB >> 28240775

Consequences matter: Self-induced tones are used as feedback to optimize tone-eliciting actions.

Bence Neszmélyi1,2, János Horváth1.   

Abstract

Experimental paradigms investigating the processing of self-induced stimuli are often based on the implicit assumption that motor processes are invariable regardless of their consequences: It is presumed that actions with different sets of predictable sensory consequences do not differ in their physical characteristics or in their brain signal reflections. The present experiment explored this assumption in the context of action-related auditory attenuation by comparing actions (pinches) with and without auditory consequences. The results show that motor processes are not invariable: Pinches eliciting a tone were softer than pinches without auditory effects. This indicates that self-induced auditory stimuli are not perceived as irrelevant side effects: The tones are used as feedback to optimize the tone-eliciting actions. The comparison of ERPs related to actions with different physical parameters (strong and soft pinches) revealed a significant ERP difference in the time range of the action-related N1 attenuation (strong pinches resulted in more negative amplitudes), suggesting that a motor correction bias may contribute to this auditory ERP attenuation effect, which is usually attributed to action-related predictive processes.
© 2017 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords:  ERP; Hearing; Motor control; Sensory attenuation; Sensory feedback; Voluntary action

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28240775     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  6 in total

1.  Precise force controls enhance loudness discrimination of self-generated sound.

Authors:  Nozomi Endo; Takayuki Ito; Takemi Mochida; Tetsuya Ijiri; Katsumi Watanabe; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects.

Authors:  Liyu Cao; Domenica Veniero; Gregor Thut; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Action-effect related motor adaptation in interactions with everyday devices.

Authors:  János Horváth; Botond Bíró; Bence Neszmélyi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Multisensory action effects facilitate the performance of motor sequences.

Authors:  Mengkai Luan; Heiko Maurer; Arash Mirifar; Jürgen Beckmann; Felix Ehrlenspiel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Binding of Task-Irrelevant Action Features and Auditory Action Effects.

Authors:  Sámuel Varga; Roland Pfister; Bence Neszmélyi; Wilfried Kunde; János Horváth
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-06

6.  Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech.

Authors:  Thomas J Whitford; Bradley N Jack; Daniel Pearson; Oren Griffiths; David Luque; Anthony Wf Harris; Kevin M Spencer; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.