| Literature DB >> 28240289 |
Weiwei Zhai1, Tony Kiat-Hon Lim2, Tong Zhang1, Su-Ting Phang3, Zenia Tiang1, Peiyong Guan1, Ming-Hwee Ng1,4, Jia Qi Lim1,4, Fei Yao1, Zheng Li1, Poh Yong Ng1, Jie Yan1, Brian K Goh5, Alexander Yaw-Fui Chung5, Su-Pin Choo6, Chiea Chuen Khor1, Wendy Wei-Jia Soon1, Ken Wing-Kin Sung1,7, Roger Sik-Yin Foo1,8, Pierce Kah-Hoe Chow3,5,9.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has one of the poorest survival rates among cancers. Using multi-regional sampling of nine resected HCC with different aetiologies, here we construct phylogenetic relationships of these sectors, showing diverse levels of genetic sharing, spanning early to late diversification. Unlike the variegated pattern found in colorectal cancers, a large proportion of HCC display a clear isolation-by-distance pattern where spatially closer sectors are genetically more similar. Two resected intra-hepatic metastases showed genetic divergence occurring before and after primary tumour diversification, respectively. Metastatic tumours had much higher variability than their primary tumours, suggesting that intra-hepatic metastasis is accompanied by rapid diversification at the distant location. The presence of co-existing mutations offers the possibility of drug repositioning for HCC treatment. Taken together, these insights into intra-tumour heterogeneity allow for a comprehensive understanding of the evolutionary trajectories of HCC and suggest novel avenues for personalized therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28240289 PMCID: PMC5333358 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Spatial sampling and genomic profiles.
(a) A schematic flow of our sectoring design. A central slice was cut from the patient tumour. A linear grid of tumour sectors was then harvested. (b) Oncoprint plot for 18 HCC drivers across 9 patients. Mutation rates, tumour purity and mutation presence data are shown in the top, middle and bottom panels. The mutation frequencies of each HCC driver gene (left side bar) were extracted from a large collection of public data sets (Methods). Sectors from each patient are ordered from left to right according to their names (T1 being the most left sector). Red shows the mutations whose frequencies are >15% and blues are those with frequencies <15%. For patient 3, we have no information for TERT promoter mutations due to exome sequencing. (c) Copy number profiles at GISTIC cytobands. Each cytoband is one row and chromosomal arms of the cytobands are shown on the right. The number in the parentheses is the total number of cytobands in that chromosome arm. Precise cytoband IDs are listed in Supplementary Fig. 4. Left side bar is the copy number profile in the GISTIC analysis. Red designates amplifications and blue is for deletions. (d) Copy number profiles of potential driver genes. Format is as c.
Figure 2The phylogenetic relationship and clinical phenotypes.
The spatial relationship in tumour sectoring (shown in the red pie chart); the phylogenetic tree relating to different sectors for each of the nine cases. For patients with enough of genetic heterogeneity (that is, except patient 1 and 4), blue and orange eclipses mark different genetic lineages and their physical locations in the tumour. Patients are ranked by their level of intra-tumour heterogeneity from left to right. The splits between the left and right lineages/sectors are marked with a red star. In patient 6 and 7, the most basal genetic lineages were detected and were labelled as green circles. Patient clinical information was displayed with coxcomb plots. In patient 7, two sectors were dropped due to poor sample quality. Two different mutations in SETD2 (chr3 47162099 and 47161730) happened in patient 8. Two different tree topologies are found across nine patients. If the most basal clone is sampled, the basal lineage will first branch off followed by the sectors from two sides of the tumour (type II). Otherwise, the phylogenetic tree will just consist of two deeply separated clades (type I).
Figure 3IBD pattern and the spatial modelling.
(a) The relationship between the number of biopsies and observed variability (see Methods). (b) IBD pattern for patient 1 and 2. The x axis is the physical distances between sectors and the y axis is the genetic differentiation (Fst) between the samples. Fst values from all sector pairs with the same physical distance were used to draw boxplots at each distance value. The regression line and the P-value are derived from the linear regression model (Methods). The boxplot plot is plotted using boxplot() with default settings from R (Methods). (c) Spatial modelling. Single cells were seeded in a three-dimensional grid and allowed to divide in all six directions until they reached a certain size. (d) Simulation results that match our data. The same sampling procedures were conducted on the simulated data. Phylogenetic trees and IBD pattern from the simulation were found to be similar to Figs 2 and 3b.
Figure 4Intra-hepatic metastasis and viral integration.
(a) The phylogenetic relationship between metastatic tumour sectors and their primary tumour. The branch linking the ancestral metastatic clone to its primary is designated as the migratory branch. Red circles mark the ancestor of the metastatic tumour. (b) HBV integration in context of the phylogenetic relationship. Integration sites are shown on each individual lineage. Integrations in red are those in hotspots. Integrations on the trunk of trees are ordered by their genomic coordinates.