| Literature DB >> 28239674 |
Felice Scasso1, Andrea Elio Sprio2, Luciano Canobbio3, Chiara Scanarotti4, Giorgio Manini5, Giovanni Nicolao Berta2, Anna Maria Bassi4.
Abstract
Oxidative stress exerts major role in the pathogenesis of side effects of many antineoplastic drugs, including ototoxicity of cisplatin. In particular, increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) represent one of the molecular mechanisms underlying the apoptosis of different types of hearing cells. Antioxidants and ROS scavengers may thus represent potential therapeutic options to prevent platinum-associated ototoxicity. The aim of this preliminary case-control study was to explore the efficacy of a dietary antioxidant supplement, in order to hamper the occurrences of ototoxicity in patients undergoing cisplatin chemotherapy. As results, a significant protection against cochlear toxic damage was demonstrated in patients who took the antioxidant supplement, which furthermore prevented the occurrence of hearing disorders and tinnitus. These clinical evidences were corroborated by the oxidative status of patients. After cisplatin chemotherapy, the plasma derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) content rapidly increased in control patients, but it was maintained in those under dietary supplementation, likely because of a higher anti-ROMs potential. Indeed, an increment in rapid anti-ROMs was detected in supplemented patients, though no differences were highlighted in terms of slow anti-ROMs. In conclusion, in this preliminary report we demonstrated the feasibility of a dietary antioxidant supplementation in order to prevent the cisplatin induced hearing damage.Entities:
Keywords: Food science; Human toxicology; Oncology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28239674 PMCID: PMC5318271 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Patient cohort characteristics.
| Gender | Age | Tumor localization | TNM | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | 1 | M | 58 | Hypopharynx | rT4N0M1 | CT |
| 2 | M | 59 | Hypopharynx | T3N0M1 | CT | |
| 3 | M | 66 | Hypopharynx | T3N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 4 | M | 50 | Pharynx | T3N3M0 | CT/RT | |
| 5 | M | 59 | Larynx | T3N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 6 | M | 65 | Throat Cancer (Larynx and Pharynx) | T3N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 7 | M | 66 | Hypopharynx | T3N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 8 | M | 67 | Nasopharyngeal Cancer | T3N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| Supplemented | 1 | F | 67 | Base of the Tongue | T1N2bM0 | CT/RT |
| 2 | M | 66 | Larynx | T4N2cM0 | CT/RT | |
| 3 | M | 66 | Oral Cavity | T4N3M0 | CT/RT | |
| 4 | M | 70 | Lung | T2N3M0 | CT | |
| 5 | M | 74 | Pancreas | T2N1M0 | CT | |
| 6 | M | 62 | Oropharynx | T1N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 7 | M | 49 | Oral Cavity | T1N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 8 | M | 67 | Hypopharynx | rT3N0M1 | CT | |
| 9 | M | 54 | Liver | T3N1M1 | CT | |
| 10 | M | 66 | Oropharynx | T2N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 11 | M | 68 | Diffuse Metastases | CT | ||
| 12 | F | 82 | Hypopharynx | T2N2aM0 | CT/RT | |
| 13 | F | 58 | Oropharynx | T3N1M0 | CT/RT | |
| 14 | M | 43 | Oropharynx | T2N1M0 | CT/RT | |
| 15 | M | 67 | Oropharynx | T2N1M0 | CT/RT | |
| 16 | M | 75 | Hypopharynx | T4N2bM0 | CT/RT | |
| 17 | M | 56 | Hypopharynx | T3N1M0 | CT/RT | |
| 18 | M | 69 | Diffuse Metastases | CT | ||
Group cohorts’ comparison.
| Controls | Supplemented | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 8/8 (100.0%) | 15/18 (83.3%) | 0.529 |
| Female | 0/8 (0.0%) | 3/18 (16.7%) | |
| Age (years ± SD) | 62.0 ± 6.2 | 65.8 ± 10.1 | 0.337 |
| Chemotherapy cycles | 3.0 ± 1.6 | 3.6 ± 1.5 | 0.365 |
| Cisplatin dose (mg) | 456.8 ± 195.5 | 464.6 ± 110.7 | 0.897 |
| Metastases | 2/8 (25.0%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | 0.563 |
| Concomitant radiotherapy | 6/8 (75.0%) | 12/18 (66.7%) | 1.000 |
| Previous otologic pathologies | 1/8 (12.5%) | 3/18 (16.7%) | 1.000 |
| Previous tinnitus | 1/8 (12.5%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | 1.000 |
Fig. 1Hearing impairments and disorders in patients. A) Variations in hearing threshold between pre and post-chemotherapy. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. B) Incidences of hearing disorders and tinnitus in the patient cohort as consequence of cisplatin administration. * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01.
Fig. 2Oxidative status in plasma samples during the chemotherapy courses. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and the corresponding linear regressions were reported. Horizontal lines represent the limit for high oxidative stress (A) and the normality threshold for Rapid (B) and Slow (C) Anti-ROMs. * = P < 0.05.