Literature DB >> 28239569

The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age.

Farhad Farahani1, Morteza Hamidi Nahrani2, Mohammad Ali Seifrabiei3, Maryam Emadi2.   

Abstract

It is well known that false positive on newborn hearing screening increases cost and maternal anxiety and worry. We aimed to evaluate the influence of mode of delivery (cesarean, vaginal) and hospital type (private, public) on false positives first screening test based on screening age. Identification and control of these factors can reduce the rate of false positives. Overall, 2784 infants were evaluated by otoacoustic emissions test. Hearing screening test was performed before hospital discharge. Finally, rate of the false-positive between both delivery group and hospital types were compared on the basis of screening age. False-positive results are obtained when a condition is not present, but the test results indicate that it is present. False positive rate in the first screening test in vaginal delivery was significantly higher than cesarean delivery and rate of significantly decreased with screening age. This reduction was observed only in cesarean delivery. Also the rate of false positives in public hospital is 2.2 fold higher than private hospital (P = 0.000) and with increase in screening age, the rate of False positive is significantly reduced in private hospitals while this decrease is not observed in public hospital. Screening test be retarded as much as possible in cesarean group and private hospital and be conducted just prior to hospital discharge also in public hospital, screening test are done in a separate room. In this way, false positive can be reduced by about six times and the cost and concerns imposed by the rate of false positives minimized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False positive; Hearing; Neonatal screening; Otoacoustic emissions

Year:  2016        PMID: 28239569      PMCID: PMC5305649          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-016-0967-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  15 in total

1.  Universal newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  H Patel; M Feldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test.

Authors:  Tatiana Smolkin; Orna Mick; Maisam Dabbah; Shraga Blazer; Galina Grakovsky; Noah Gabay; Arie Gordin; Imad R Makhoul
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K J Doyle; B Burggraaff; S Fujikawa; J Kim; C J MacArthur
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Tatiana Smolkin; Sharehan Awawdeh; Shraga Blazer; Orna Mick; Imad R Makhoul
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  Time after birth in relation to failure rate in newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  Luciana da Mata Lupoli; Laura Garcia; Adriana Ribeiro Tavares Anastasio; Ana Claudia Fontana
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 6.  A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment.

Authors:  A Davis; J Bamford; I Wilson; T Ramkalawan; M Forshaw; S Wright
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Anxiety of the mothers with referred baby during Universal Newborn Hearing Screening.

Authors:  Md Daud Mohd Khairi; Kamaruddin Noor Rafidah; Ahmad Affizal; Abd Rahman Normastura; Mansor Suzana; Zakaria Mohamad Normani
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 8.  The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  Saral Mehra; Roland D Eavey; Donald G Keamy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Main outcomes of a newborn hearing screening program in Belgium over six years.

Authors:  Bénédicte Vos; Raphaël Lagasse; Alain Levêque
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: A pilot study.

Authors:  Katijah Khoza-Shangase; Karin Joubert
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2011-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results.

Authors:  Selis Gülseven Güven
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Parent's Satisfaction of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran.

Authors:  Arash Bayat; Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Nader Saki; Farzad Faraji Khiavi; Saeed Mohammadian; Mohammadsaleh Moosapour Bardsiri; Reza Hoseinabadi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-01-09

3.  The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hasan Ibrahim Al-Balas; Amjad Nuseir; Maha Zaitoun; Mahmoud Al-Balas; Almu'atasim Khamees; Hamzeh Al-Balas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results.

Authors:  Mahbod Kaveh; Seyedeh Nastaran Mirjalali; Mamak Shariat; Mohammad Reza Zarkesh
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.