Britt Christensen1, Stephen B Hanauer2, Jonathan Erlich3, Olufemi Kassim3, Peter R Gibson4, Jerrold R Turner5, John Hart5, David T Rubin6. 1. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: drubin@medicine.bsd.uchicago.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mucosal healing, determined by histologic analysis, is a potential therapeutic target for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the histologic features of tissue normalization, as an outcome of treatment, have not been well described. We examined the prevalence and predictive values of normalization of the colonic mucosa, based on histologic analysis (histologic normalization) in patients with UC, and determined its association with risk of clinical relapse, compared with histologic disease quiescence and endoscopic mucosal healing. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 646 patients with confirmed UC who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center from August 2005 through October 2013. We reviewed reports from pathology analyses of random mucosal biopsies from each colon segment, and categorized them into 3 groups based on histology findings: (1) normalization (completely normal mucosa with no features of chronicity present), (2) quiescence (crypt atrophy or branching without signs of active inflammation including erosions, abscesses, or focal neutrophil infiltration), or (3) active disease (epithelial infiltration by neutrophils, crypt abscesses, erosions, or ulceration). Histology findings were compared with clinical and endoscopic findings. We assessed variables associated with histology findings and, in patients in clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score ≤2 and subscore of ≤1 for stool frequency or rectal bleeding), predictive values for clinical relapse at follow-up evaluations 6 months later or more were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 646 patients included in the study, 60% had endoscopic mucosal healing, 40% had histologic quiescence, and 10% had histologic normalization. The level of agreement between mucosal and histologic activity was moderate (agreement for 68% of samples; κ = 0.50; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only proctitis associated with histologic normalization (P = .002). Of 310 patients in clinical remission at initial review, 25% had a clinical relapse, after a median time of 16 months (interquartile range, 10-23 months). Histologic normalization was independently associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with histologic quiescence (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-12.46; P = .007) and histologic activity (hazard ratio, 6.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.16-20.62; P = .001); mucosal healing was not associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with no mucosal healing (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.85; P = .954). CONCLUSIONS: Histologic normalization of colonic mucosa can be used as a clinical endpoint for patients with UC. We associated histologic normalization with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with endoscopic healing or histologic quiescence. Further studies are needed to determine whether histologic normalization should be a goal of treatment for patients with UC.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mucosal healing, determined by histologic analysis, is a potential therapeutic target for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the histologic features of tissue normalization, as an outcome of treatment, have not been well described. We examined the prevalence and predictive values of normalization of the colonic mucosa, based on histologic analysis (histologic normalization) in patients with UC, and determined its association with risk of clinical relapse, compared with histologic disease quiescence and endoscopic mucosal healing. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 646 patients with confirmed UC who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center from August 2005 through October 2013. We reviewed reports from pathology analyses of random mucosal biopsies from each colon segment, and categorized them into 3 groups based on histology findings: (1) normalization (completely normal mucosa with no features of chronicity present), (2) quiescence (crypt atrophy or branching without signs of active inflammation including erosions, abscesses, or focal neutrophil infiltration), or (3) active disease (epithelial infiltration by neutrophils, crypt abscesses, erosions, or ulceration). Histology findings were compared with clinical and endoscopic findings. We assessed variables associated with histology findings and, in patients in clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score ≤2 and subscore of ≤1 for stool frequency or rectal bleeding), predictive values for clinical relapse at follow-up evaluations 6 months later or more were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 646 patients included in the study, 60% had endoscopic mucosal healing, 40% had histologic quiescence, and 10% had histologic normalization. The level of agreement between mucosal and histologic activity was moderate (agreement for 68% of samples; κ = 0.50; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only proctitisassociated with histologic normalization (P = .002). Of 310 patients in clinical remission at initial review, 25% had a clinical relapse, after a median time of 16 months (interquartile range, 10-23 months). Histologic normalization was independently associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with histologic quiescence (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-12.46; P = .007) and histologic activity (hazard ratio, 6.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.16-20.62; P = .001); mucosal healing was not associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with no mucosal healing (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.85; P = .954). CONCLUSIONS: Histologic normalization of colonic mucosa can be used as a clinical endpoint for patients with UC. We associated histologic normalization with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with endoscopic healing or histologic quiescence. Further studies are needed to determine whether histologic normalization should be a goal of treatment for patients with UC.
Authors: Linda A Feagins; Shelby D Melton; Ramiz Iqbal; Kerry B Dunbar; Stuart J Spechler Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Talat Bessissow; Bart Lemmens; Marc Ferrante; Raf Bisschops; Kristel Van Steen; Karel Geboes; Gert Van Assche; Séverine Vermeire; Paul Rutgeerts; Gert De Hertogh Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Brian G Feagan; Walter Reinisch; Paul Rutgeerts; William J Sandborn; Songkai Yan; Debra Eisenberg; Mohan Bala; Jewel Johanns; Allan Olson; Stephen B Hanauer Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ellen J Scherl; Ronald Pruitt; Glenn L Gordon; Mark Lamet; Audrey Shaw; Shirley Huang; Shadreck Mareya; William P Forbes Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: David T Rubin; Dezheng Huo; Jami A Kinnucan; Mina S Sedrak; Nicole E McCullom; Alana P Bunnag; Elin P Raun-Royer; Russell D Cohen; Stephen B Hanauer; John Hart; Jerrold R Turner Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: L Peyrin-Biroulet; W Sandborn; B E Sands; W Reinisch; W Bemelman; R V Bryant; G D'Haens; I Dotan; M Dubinsky; B Feagan; G Fiorino; R Gearry; S Krishnareddy; P L Lakatos; E V Loftus; P Marteau; P Munkholm; T B Murdoch; I Ordás; R Panaccione; R H Riddell; J Ruel; D T Rubin; M Samaan; C A Siegel; M S Silverberg; J Stoker; S Schreiber; S Travis; G Van Assche; S Danese; J Panes; G Bouguen; S O'Donnell; B Pariente; S Winer; S Hanauer; J-F Colombel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Robert V Bryant; Daniel C Burger; Joseph Delo; Alissa J Walsh; Sally Thomas; Axel von Herbay; Otto C Buchel; Lydia White; Oliver Brain; Satish Keshav; Bryan F Warren; Simon P L Travis Journal: Gut Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Amanda Israel; Britt Christensen; Katia El Jurdi; Victoria Rai; Jacob E Ollech; Russell D Cohen; Atsushi Sakuraba; Sushila R Dalal; David T Rubin Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Kelly C Cushing; William Tan; David H Alpers; Vikram Deshpande; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Robert Battat; Niels Vande Casteele; Rish K Pai; Zhongya Wang; Guangyong Zou; John W D McDonald; Marjolijn Duijvestein; Jenny Jeyarajah; Claire E Parker; Tanja Van Viegen; Sigrid A Nelson; Brigid S Boland; Siddharth Singh; Parambir S Dulai; Mark A Valasek; Brian G Feagan; Vipul Jairath; William J Sandborn Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-09-27 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Robert Battat; Parambir S Dulai; Christopher Ma; Vipul Jairath; Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn; Reena Khanna Journal: Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol Date: 2020-01-04
Authors: Wing Yan Mak; Anthony Buisson; Michael J Andersen; Donald Lei; Joel Pekow; Russell D Cohen; Stacy A Kahn; Bruno Pereira; David T Rubin Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.199