Ji Young Chang1, Jae Hee Cheon2, Yehyun Park1, Soo Jung Park1, Tae-Il Kim1, Won-Ho Kim1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. GENIUSHEE@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between clinical symptoms and mucosal inflammation have been reported in up to 50% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there are no guidelines and only limited information for appropriate treatment manipulation. AIM: We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes according to treatment strategies and determine predictive factors for disease relapse in UC patients who are in clinical remission (CR) but still have endoscopic inflammation. METHODS: A total of 204 patients who were confirmed as achieving CR but still had mucosal inflammation were included. CR was defined as "partial Mayo score ≤ 1" with no changes in medications or use of any corticosteroids during the past 3 months. An active mucosal lesion was defined as "endoscopic Mayo subscore > 0." RESULTS: The mean patient age was 43.5 years, and 53.9% were male. The mean disease duration was 89.9 months. During a mean follow-up of 34 months, 90 patients (44%) experienced disease relapse. The cumulative relapse-free rate did not differ by treatment strategy (maintenance of current therapy vs. dose elevation or step-up therapy). Multivariate analysis revealed that left-side colitis or pancolitis at diagnosis (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.04-4.27; P = 0.040) and number of extraintestinal manifestations ≥ 2 (OR 5.62; 95% CI 1.10-28.68; P = 0.038) were independent predictive factors for disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The current medical acceleration treatment strategy did not have a significant influence on the long-term outcomes of UC patients in CR but with active mucosal inflammation. Disease extent at diagnosis and extraintestinal manifestations were independently predictive of disease relapse.
BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between clinical symptoms and mucosal inflammation have been reported in up to 50% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there are no guidelines and only limited information for appropriate treatment manipulation. AIM: We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes according to treatment strategies and determine predictive factors for disease relapse in UC patients who are in clinical remission (CR) but still have endoscopic inflammation. METHODS: A total of 204 patients who were confirmed as achieving CR but still had mucosal inflammation were included. CR was defined as "partial Mayo score ≤ 1" with no changes in medications or use of any corticosteroids during the past 3 months. An active mucosal lesion was defined as "endoscopic Mayo subscore > 0." RESULTS: The mean patient age was 43.5 years, and 53.9% were male. The mean disease duration was 89.9 months. During a mean follow-up of 34 months, 90 patients (44%) experienced disease relapse. The cumulative relapse-free rate did not differ by treatment strategy (maintenance of current therapy vs. dose elevation or step-up therapy). Multivariate analysis revealed that left-side colitis or pancolitis at diagnosis (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.04-4.27; P = 0.040) and number of extraintestinal manifestations ≥ 2 (OR 5.62; 95% CI 1.10-28.68; P = 0.038) were independent predictive factors for disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The current medical acceleration treatment strategy did not have a significant influence on the long-term outcomes of UC patients in CR but with active mucosal inflammation. Disease extent at diagnosis and extraintestinal manifestations were independently predictive of disease relapse.
Authors: Geert D'Haens; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Karel Geboes; Stephen B Hanauer; E Jan Irvine; Marc Lémann; Philippe Marteau; Paul Rutgeerts; Jurgen Schölmerich; Lloyd R Sutherland Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Laura Rosenberg; Garrett O Lawlor; Talia Zenlea; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Anne Gifford; Kenneth R Falchuk; Jacqueline L Wolf; Adam S Cheifetz; Simon C Robson; Alan C Moss Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: James D Lewis; Shaokun Chuai; Lisa Nessel; Gary R Lichtenstein; Faten N Aberra; Jonas H Ellenberg Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Robert V Bryant; Daniel C Burger; Joseph Delo; Alissa J Walsh; Sally Thomas; Axel von Herbay; Otto C Buchel; Lydia White; Oliver Brain; Satish Keshav; Bryan F Warren; Simon P L Travis Journal: Gut Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 23.059