Literature DB >> 28238701

Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial.

Nir Lipsman1, Eileen Lam2, Matthew Volpini3, Kalam Sutandar2, Richelle Twose2, Peter Giacobbe2, Devin J Sodums4, Gwenn S Smith4, D Blake Woodside2, Andres M Lozano5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa is a life-threatening illness. Brain circuits believed to drive anorexia nervosa symptoms can be accessed with surgical techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Initial results suggest that DBS of the subcallosal cingulate is safe and associated with improvements in mood and anxiety. Here, we investigated the safety, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes of DBS of the subcallosal cingulate in a group of patients during 12 months of active stimulation.
METHODS: We did this prospective open-label trial at the Department of Surgery of the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada). Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 20-60 years and had a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (restricting or binge-purging subtype) and a demonstrated history of chronicity or treatment resistance. Following a period of medical stabilisation, patients underwent surgery for DBS and received open-label continuous stimulation for the entire 1 year study duration. The primary outcome was safety and acceptability of the procedure. The secondary outcomes were body-mass index (BMI), mood, anxiety, affective regulation, and anorexia nervosa-specific behaviours at 12 months after surgery, as well as changes in neural circuitry (measured with PET imaging of cerebral glucose metabolism at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after surgery). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01476540.
FINDINGS: 16 patients with treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa were enrolled between September, 2011, and January, 2014, and underwent DBS of the subcallosal cingulate between November, 2011, and April, 2014. Patients had a mean age of 34 years (SD 8) and average illness duration of 18 years (SD 6). Two patients requested that their devices be removed or deactivated during the study, although their reasons for doing so were poorly defined. The most common adverse event was pain related to surgical incision or positioning that required oral analgesics for longer than 3-4 days after surgery (five [31%] of 16 patients). Seven (44%) of 16 patients had serious adverse events, most of which were related to the underlying illness, including electrolyte disturbances. Average BMI at surgery was 13·83 (SD 1·49) and 14 (88%) of the 16 patients had comorbid mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or both. Mean BMI after 12 months of stimulation was 17·34 (SD 3·40; p=0·0009 vs baseline). DBS was associated with significant improvements in measures of depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores 19·40 [SD 6·76] at baseline vs 8·79 [7·64] at 12 months; p=0·00015), anxiety (mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score 38·00 [15·55] vs 27·14 [18·39]; p=0·035), and affective regulation (mean Dysfunction in Emotional Regulation Scale score 131·80 [22·04] vs 104·36 [31·27]; p=0·019). We detected significant changes in cerebral glucose metabolism in key anorexia nervosa-related structures at both 6 months and 12 months of ongoing brain stimulation.
INTERPRETATION: In patients with chronic treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa, DBS is well tolerated and is associated with significant and sustained improvements in affective symptoms, BMI, and changes in neural circuitry at 12 months after surgery. FUNDING: Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders Research and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28238701     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30076-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  32 in total

1.  The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.

Authors:  Uma R Mohan; Andrew J Watrous; Jonathan F Miller; Bradley C Lega; Michael R Sperling; Gregory A Worrell; Robert E Gross; Kareem A Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Kathryn A Davis; Sameer A Sheth; Joel M Stein; Sandhitsu R Das; Richard Gorniak; Paul A Wanda; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Metabolic activity in subcallosal cingulate predicts response to deep brain stimulation for depression.

Authors:  Elliot C Brown; Darren L Clark; Nils D Forkert; Christine P Molnar; Zelma H T Kiss; Rajamannar Ramasubbu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Emerging Treatments in Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Michael Lutter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.

Authors:  Martijn Figee; Patricio Riva-Posse; Ki Sueng Choi; Lucia Bederson; Helen S Mayberg; Brian H Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.088

Review 5.  Neuromodulation for the treatment of eating disorders and obesity.

Authors:  Darrin J Lee; Gavin J B Elias; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 6.  Brain Stimulation to Modulate Food Intake and Eating Behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Dendy; Emma J Stinson; Nicolas Guerithault; Marci E Gluck
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Neurosurgery and neuromodulation for anorexia nervosa in the 21st century: a systematic review of treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Stuart B Murray; Michael Strober; Reza Tadayonnejad; Ausaf A Bari; Jamie D Feusner
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 8.  The utility of deep brain stimulation surgery for treating eating disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Immanuel Potes; Christian Joaquin; Nicole Wiecks; Sheshanna Phan; Omron Hassan
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 9.  Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andres M Lozano; Nir Lipsman; Hagai Bergman; Peter Brown; Stephan Chabardes; Jin Woo Chang; Keith Matthews; Cameron C McIntyre; Thomas E Schlaepfer; Michael Schulder; Yasin Temel; Jens Volkmann; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  High-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata Facilitates Extinction and Prevents Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference.

Authors:  Libo Zhang; Shiqiu Meng; Wenjun Chen; Yun Chen; Enze Huang; Guipeng Zhang; Yisen Liang; Zengbo Ding; Yanxue Xue; Yun Chen; Jie Shi; Yu Shi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.