Literature DB >> 28235242

Is It Okay To Ask: Transgender Patient Perspectives on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection in Healthcare.

Allysha C Maragh-Bass1, Maya Torain2,3, Rachel Adler2,3, Anju Ranjit2,3, Eric Schneider2,3, Ryan Y Shields2,3, Lisa M Kodadek, Claire F Snyder1,4, Danielle German1, Susan Peterson4, Jeremiah Schuur5, Brandyn D Lau4, Adil H Haider2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The National Academy of Medicine and Joint Commission recommend routine documentation of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) in healthcare to address lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) health disparities. We explored transgender patient-reported views on the importance on SO/GI collection, their willingness to disclose, and their perceived facilitators of SO/GI collection in primary care and emergency department (ED) settings.
METHODS: We recruited a national sample of self-identified transgender patients. Participants completed demographic questions, survey questions, and free-response comments regarding their views on SO/GI collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; inductive content analysis was conducted with open-ended responses.
RESULTS: Patients mostly self-identified as male gender (54.5%), white (58.4%), and SO other than heterosexual or LGB (33.7%; N = 101). Patients felt that it was more important for primary care providers to know their GI than SO (89.1% vs. 57%; p < 0.001); there was no difference among reported importance for ED providers to know the patients' SO versus GI. Females were more likely than males to report medical relevance to chief complaint as a facilitator to SO disclosure (89.1% vs. 80%; p = 0.02) and less likely to identify routine collection from all patients as a facilitator to GI disclosure (67.4% vs. 78.2%; p = 0.09). Qualitatively, many patients reported that medical relevance to chief complaint and an LGBT-friendly environment would increase willingness to disclose their SO/GI. Patients also reported need for educating providers in LGBT health prior to implementing routine SO/GI collection.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients see the importance of providing GI more than SO to providers; nonetheless they are willing to disclose SO/GI in general.. Findings also suggest that gender differences may exist in facilitators of SO/GI disclosure. Given the underrepresentation of transgender patients in healthcare, it is crucial for providers to address their concerns with SO/GI disclosure, which include LGBT education for medical staff and provision of a safe environment.
© 2017 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28235242     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  20 in total

1.  Perspectives from Transgender and Gender Diverse People on How to Ask About Gender.

Authors:  Jae A Puckett; Nina C Brown; Terra Dunn; Brian Mustanski; Michael E Newcomb
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.151

2.  The "Ask" Is the "Answer": Implementing Routine Documentation of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Health Care.

Authors:  Allysha C Maragh-Bass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Dermatologic care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons: Terminology, demographics, health disparities, and approaches to care.

Authors:  Howa Yeung; Kevin M Luk; Suephy C Chen; Brian A Ginsberg; Kenneth A Katz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Health and Care Utilization of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youth: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  G Nicole Rider; Barbara J McMorris; Amy L Gower; Eli Coleman; Marla E Eisenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Affirming Transgender Youths' Names and Pronouns in the Electronic Medical Record.

Authors:  Gina M Sequeira; Kacie Kidd; Robert W S Coulter; Elizabeth Miller; Robert Garofalo; Kristin N Ray
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph K Canner; Omar Harfouch; Lisa M Kodadek; Danielle Pelaez; Devin Coon; Anaeze C Offodile; Adil H Haider; Brandyn D Lau
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Encouraging patients to disclose their lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) status: oncology health care providers' perspectives.

Authors:  Smita C Banerjee; Jessica M Staley; Koshy Alexander; Chasity B Walters; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Cancers Disproportionately Affecting the New York State Transgender Population, 1979-2016.

Authors:  Lindsey M Hutchison; Francis P Boscoe; Beth J Feingold
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  LGBT+ Individuals' Perceptions of Healthcare Services in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Şükrü Keleş; Mustafa Volkan Kavas; Neyyire Yasemin Yalım
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  Planning and implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in electronic health records.

Authors:  Chris Grasso; Michal J McDowell; Hilary Goldhammer; Alex S Keuroghlian
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.