Literature DB >> 28234854

Transverse Cervical Artery: Consistent Anatomical Landmarks and Clinical Experience with Its Use as a Recipient Artery in Complex Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Oren Tessler1, Mirko S Gilardino, Matthew J Bartow, Hugo St Hilaire, Daniel Womac, Tassos Dionisopoulos, Lucie Lessard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many head and neck reconstructions occur in patients with extensive history of surgery or radiation treatment. This leads to complicated free flap reconstructions, especially in choosing recipient vessels in a "frozen neck." The transverse cervical artery is an optimal second-line recipient artery in head and neck reconstruction.
METHODS: Seventy-two neck sides in 36 cadavers were dissected, looking for the transverse cervical artery and transverse cervical vein. Anatomical location of these vessels, their diameter, and length were documented. A retrospective analysis on 19 patients who had head and neck reconstruction using the transverse cervical artery as a recipient artery was undertaken as well with regard to outcome of procedures, reason for surgery, previous operations, and use of vein grafts during surgery.
RESULTS: The transverse cervical artery was present in 72 of 72 of cadaveric specimens, and was infraclavicular in two of 72 specimens. Transverse cervical artery length ranged from 4.0 to 7.0 cm, and the mean diameter was 2.65 mm. The transverse cervical vein was present in 61 of 72 cadaveric specimens, the length ranged from 4.0 to 7.0 cm, and the mean diameter was 2.90 mm. The transverse cervical artery averaged 33 mm from midline, and branched off the thyrocervical trunk at an average 17 mm superior to the clavicle. Transverse cervical artery stenosis was markedly less in comparison with external carotid artery stenosis. In a 20-year clinical follow-up study, the transverse cervical artery was the recipient artery in 19 patients. A vein graft was used in one patient, and no flap loss occurred in any of the 19 patients.
CONCLUSION: The transverse cervical artery is a reliable and robust option as a recipient artery in free flap head and neck reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28234854     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  Head and Neck Reconstruction of the Vessel-Depleted Neck: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Beatriz Hatsue Kushida-Contreras; Oscar J Manrique; Miguel Angel Gaxiola-García
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A morphometric analysis of the suitability of the transverse cervical artery as a recipient artery in head and neck free flap microvascular reconstruction.

Authors:  M Reissis; Dimitris Reissis; G B Bottini; A Messiha; D C Davies
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Unusual lymph node metastasis from cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Yo Sato; Eiji Sunami; Kenichiro Hirano; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Motoko Takahashi
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-14

4.  Recipient Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Hiller; Jared Davis; Steven Schulz; Josh Henderson; B J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-12-22

5.  Transverse cervical vascular pedicle: It's extended use as 'second-line' recipient vessels in thoracic and upper arm reconstructions in addition to head-and-neck reconstructions.

Authors:  Srijana Muppireddy; Parvathi Ravula; Srikanth Rangachari; Najma Shaik; Sushma Maaturu
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2018 May-Aug

6.  Transverse cervical vessels as a recipient site for microvascular reconstruction in vessel-depleted necks: a safe option.

Authors:  Adriano-Valerio Schettini; Ali Modarressi; Eva Ruegg; Daniel Kalbermatten; Brigitte Pittet-Cuenod
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.