Elizabeth R Mueller1, Alan J Wolfe, Linda Brubaker. 1. aDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The newly discovered female urinary microbiota has the potential to deepen our understanding of urinary tract health and disease, including common lower urinary tract conditions such as urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection. The spectrum of painful bladder disorders and other less common conditions also may benefit from additional research that includes consideration of the resident bacterial community of the female bladder. The present review provides a clinical context for the rapidly emerging research regarding the female urinary microbiota and its relationships with urinary tract conditions of interest. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies using culture-independent techniques confirm prior reports of bacteria that reside in the female urinary bladder. These resident communities, the female urinary microbiota, possess characteristics that differ between women affected by urgency urinary incontinence and matched, unaffected controls. Enhanced urine culture techniques permit cultivation of organisms, including uropathogens, missed by standard urine culture, but detected by culture-independent sequencing techniques. SUMMARY: New technology is available. Clinical laboratories can modify traditional standard urine culture methods to enhance detection of uropathogens. However, given the existence of the female urinary microbiota, the simple presence of bacteria in the lower urinary tract should not be taken as evidence of infection.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The newly discovered female urinary microbiota has the potential to deepen our understanding of urinary tract health and disease, including common lower urinary tract conditions such as urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection. The spectrum of painful bladder disorders and other less common conditions also may benefit from additional research that includes consideration of the resident bacterial community of the female bladder. The present review provides a clinical context for the rapidly emerging research regarding the female urinary microbiota and its relationships with urinary tract conditions of interest. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies using culture-independent techniques confirm prior reports of bacteria that reside in the female urinary bladder. These resident communities, the female urinary microbiota, possess characteristics that differ between women affected by urgency urinary incontinence and matched, unaffected controls. Enhanced urine culture techniques permit cultivation of organisms, including uropathogens, missed by standard urine culture, but detected by culture-independent sequencing techniques. SUMMARY: New technology is available. Clinical laboratories can modify traditional standard urine culture methods to enhance detection of uropathogens. However, given the existence of the female urinary microbiota, the simple presence of bacteria in the lower urinary tract should not be taken as evidence of infection.
Authors: Ann E Stapleton; Melissa Au-Yeung; Thomas M Hooton; David N Fredricks; Pacita L Roberts; Christopher A Czaja; Yuliya Yarova-Yarovaya; Tina Fiedler; Marsha Cox; Walter E Stamm Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Evann E Hilt; Kathleen McKinley; Meghan M Pearce; Amy B Rosenfeld; Michael J Zilliox; Elizabeth R Mueller; Linda Brubaker; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe; Paul C Schreckenberger Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Phong T Le; Meghan M Pearce; Shubin Zhang; Edward M Campbell; Cynthia S Fok; Elizabeth R Mueller; Cynthia A Brincat; Alan J Wolfe; Linda Brubaker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Derrick E Fouts; Rembert Pieper; Sebastian Szpakowski; Hans Pohl; Susan Knoblach; Moo-Jin Suh; Shih-Ting Huang; Inger Ljungberg; Bruce M Sprague; Sarah K Lucas; Manolito Torralba; Karen E Nelson; Suzanne L Groah Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Chang Hyun Song; Young Ho Kim; Manisha Naskar; Byron W Hayes; Mathew A Abraham; Joo Hwan Noh; Gyeongseo Suk; Min Jung Kim; Kyu Sang Cho; Minhye Shin; Eun-Jin Lee; Soman N Abraham; Hae Woong Choi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Lei Huang; Xiangyan Li; Bo Zheng; Pengtao Li; Dali Wei; Chenwei Huang; Liying Sun; Haixia Li Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 6.064
Authors: Jacob E Simmering; Linnea A Polgreen; Joseph E Cavanaugh; Bradley A Erickson; Manish Suneja; Philip M Polgreen Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Virginia Perez-Carrasco; Ana Soriano-Lerma; Miguel Soriano; José Gutiérrez-Fernández; Jose A Garcia-Salcedo Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Sarah E Brown; Courtney K Robinson; Michelle D Shardell; Johanna B Holm; Jacques Ravel; Khalil G Ghanem; Rebecca M Brotman Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Lindsey A Burnett; Baylie R Hochstedler; Kelly Weldon; Alan J Wolfe; Linda Brubaker Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Benjamin Abelson; Daniel Sun; Lauren Que; Rebecca A Nebel; Dylan Baker; Patrick Popiel; Cindy L Amundsen; Toby Chai; Clare Close; Michael DiSanto; Matthew O Fraser; Stephanie J Kielb; George Kuchel; Elizabeth R Mueller; Mary H Palmer; Candace Parker-Autry; Alan J Wolfe; Margot S Damaser Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 5.027