Literature DB >> 28234616

The development and validation of a multivariable model to predict whether patients referred for total knee replacement are suitable surgical candidates at the time of initial consultation.

Laura Churchill1, Samuel J Malian1, Bert M Chesworth1, Dianne Bryant1, Steven J MacDonald1, Jacquelyn D Marsh1, J Robert Giffin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous studies, 50%-70% of patients referred to orthopedic surgeons for total knee replacement (TKR) were not surgical candidates at the time of initial assessment. The purpose of our study was to identify and cross-validate patient self-reported predictors of suitability for TKR and to determine the clinical utility of a predictive model to guide the timing and appropriateness of referral to a surgeon.
METHODS: We assessed pre-consultation patient data as well as the surgeon's findings and post-consultation recommendations. We used multivariate logistic regression to detect self-reported items that could identify suitable surgical candidates.
RESULTS: Patients' willingness to undergo surgery, higher rating of pain, greater physical function, previous intra-articular injections and patient age were the factors predictive of patients being offered and electing to undergo TKR.
CONCLUSION: The application of the model developed in our study would effectively reduce the proportion of nonsurgical referrals by 25%, while identifying the vast majority of surgical candidates (> 90%). Using patient-reported information, we can correctly predict the outcome of specialist consultation for TKR in 70% of cases. To reduce long waits for first consultation with a surgeon, it may be possible to use these items to educate and guide referring clinicians and patients to understand when specialist consultation is the next step in managing the patient with severe osteoarthritis of the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28234616      PMCID: PMC5125923          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  16 in total

1.  The economic burden of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ryan Bitton
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  The economic burden of disabling hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) from the perspective of individuals living with this condition.

Authors:  S Gupta; G A Hawker; A Laporte; R Croxford; P C Coyte
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; A R Feinstein; T R Holford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.

Authors:  Amanda E Nelson; Kelli D Allen; Yvonne M Golightly; Adam P Goode; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  S K Gandhi; J W Salmon; S Z Zhao; B L Lambert; P R Gore; K Conrad
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with standardized paper questionnaires.

Authors:  F Salaffi; S Gasparini; W Grassi
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.473

7.  Feasibility of neuromuscular training in patients with severe hip or knee OA: the individualized goal-based NEMEX-TJR training program.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg; Anne Link; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Anthony D Woolf; Bruce Pfleger
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 9.  Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean?

Authors:  Tore K Kvien; Turid Heiberg; Kåre B Hagen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Linda Fernandes; Kåre B Hagen; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Oyvor Andreassen; Pia Christensen; Philip G Conaghan; Michael Doherty; Rinie Geenen; Alison Hammond; Ingvild Kjeken; L Stefan Lohmander; Hans Lund; Christian D Mallen; Tiziana Nava; Susan Oliver; Karel Pavelka; Irene Pitsillidou; José Antonio da Silva; Jenny de la Torre; Gustavo Zanoli; Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unnecessary ordering of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: A retrospective chart review of referrals to orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Heba Tallah Mohammed; Samuel Yoon; Thomas Hupel; Lori-Anne Payson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuxuan Zhou; Claire Weeden; Lauren Patten; Michelle Dowsey; Samantha Bunzli; Peter Choong; Chris Schilling
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.