Literature DB >> 19604439

The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with standardized paper questionnaires.

F Salaffi1, S Gasparini, W Grassi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acceptability, feasibility, reliability and score agreement of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient-reported outcome (PRO) data using an interactive touch-screen computer system.
METHODS: Eighty-seven RA patients completed both the touch-screen and conventional paper-administered set of questionnaires. For this purpose, we have developed a computerized touch-screen system, namely RHEUMATISM (RHEUMA Touch-screen Italian SysteM), to capture PRO data. Variables recorded include the following information: demographic data, VAS scores for pain, patient's and physician's assessment of global activity, and physician's assessment of general health status, 28-joint counts measuring tender and swollen joint, patient self-reported tender joint count, Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability index, and laboratory findings. In a further test-retest study, 35 patients were evaluated.
RESULTS: Although over half the patients had no prior computer experience, nearly all found the touch-screen easy to use. Moreover, 86% of the patients preferred the computer format to the paper format (2%) and 12% of subjects had no preference. The quality of the data collected with the touch-screen system was good, with no missed responses. Agreement between scores obtained with the two modes of administration was very good, with concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) from 0.887 to 0.972. CCCs were similar in men and in women, in subjects with or without prior computer experience and in subjects below or above age 65. The electronic questionnaire had good test-retest reliability (CCCs from 0.836 to 0.907).
CONCLUSIONS: Computer touch-screen questionnaires were well accepted by RA patients, with good data quality, reliability and score agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19604439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  16 in total

Review 1.  Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Daniel Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Holly Rice; Liam Gabb; Madeleine King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Can the e-OAKHQOL be an alternative to measure health-related quality of life in knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Maud Wieczorek; Christine Rotonda; Jonathan Epstein; Francis Guillemin; Anne-Christine Rat
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Niloufar Campbell; Faraz Ali; Andrew Y Finlay; Sam S Salek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Franco Franchignoni; Andrea Giordano; Alessandro Ciapetti; Stefania Gasparini; Marcella Ottonello
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Evaluating the feasibility of using online software to collect patient information in a chiropractic practice-based research network.

Authors:  Ania Kania-Richmond; Laura Weeks; Jeffrey Scholten; Mikaël Reney
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-03

6.  Validation of Portuguese-translated computer touch-screen questionnaires in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, compared with paper formats.

Authors:  Luís Cunha-Miranda; Helena Santos; Cláudia Miguel; Cândida Silva; Filipe Barcelos; Joana Borges; Ricardo Trinca; Vera Vicente; Tiago Silva
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  The development and validation of a multivariable model to predict whether patients referred for total knee replacement are suitable surgical candidates at the time of initial consultation.

Authors:  Laura Churchill; Samuel J Malian; Bert M Chesworth; Dianne Bryant; Steven J MacDonald; Jacquelyn D Marsh; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.

Authors:  Willie Muehlhausen; Helen Doll; Nuz Quadri; Bethany Fordham; Paul O'Donohoe; Nijda Dogar; Diane J Wild
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Measurement equivalence and feasibility of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: paper-and-pencil versus touch-screen administration.

Authors:  Yu-Jun Chang; Chih-Hung Chang; Chiao-Ling Peng; Hsi-Chin Wu; Hsueh-Chun Lin; Jong-Yi Wang; Tsai-Chung Li; Yi-Chun Yeh; Wen-Miin Liang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire: equivalence, reliability, validity, and feasibility of the touch-screen administration versus the paper-and-pencil version.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Marina Carotti; Sonia Farah; Marwin Gutierrez
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.