Literature DB >> 25979346

Methods for discovery and characterization of cell subsets in high dimensional mass cytometry data.

Kirsten E Diggins1, P Brent Ferrell2, Jonathan M Irish3.   

Abstract

The flood of high-dimensional data resulting from mass cytometry experiments that measure more than 40 features of individual cells has stimulated creation of new single cell computational biology tools. These tools draw on advances in the field of machine learning to capture multi-parametric relationships and reveal cells that are easily overlooked in traditional analysis. Here, we introduce a workflow for high dimensional mass cytometry data that emphasizes unsupervised approaches and visualizes data in both single cell and population level views. This workflow includes three central components that are common across mass cytometry analysis approaches: (1) distinguishing initial populations, (2) revealing cell subsets, and (3) characterizing subset features. In the implementation described here, viSNE, SPADE, and heatmaps were used sequentially to comprehensively characterize and compare healthy and malignant human tissue samples. The use of multiple methods helps provide a comprehensive view of results, and the largely unsupervised workflow facilitates automation and helps researchers avoid missing cell populations with unusual or unexpected phenotypes. Together, these methods develop a framework for future machine learning of cell identity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow cytometry; Machine learning; Mass cytometry; Single cell biology; Unsupervised analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979346      PMCID: PMC4468028          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  51 in total

1.  Publication of optimized multicolor immunofluorescence panels.

Authors:  Yolanda Mahnke; Pratip Chattopadhyay; Mario Roederer
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Data File Standard for Flow Cytometry, version FCS 3.1.

Authors:  Josef Spidlen; Wayne Moore; David Parks; Michael Goldberg; Chris Bray; Pierre Bierre; Peter Gorombey; Bill Hyun; Mark Hubbard; Simon Lange; Ray Lefebvre; Robert Leif; David Novo; Leo Ostruszka; Adam Treister; James Wood; Robert F Murphy; Mario Roederer; Damir Sudar; Robert Zigon; Ryan R Brinkman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development.

Authors:  Sean C Bendall; Kara L Davis; El-Ad David Amir; Michelle D Tadmor; Erin F Simonds; Tiffany J Chen; Daniel K Shenfeld; Garry P Nolan; Dana Pe'er
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Automated flow cytometric analysis across large numbers of samples and cell types.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Chen; Milena Hasan; Valentina Libri; Alejandra Urrutia; Benoît Beitz; Vincent Rouilly; Darragh Duffy; Étienne Patin; Bernard Chalmond; Lars Rogge; Lluis Quintana-Murci; Matthew L Albert; Benno Schwikowski
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Cytometry by time-of-flight shows combinatorial cytokine expression and virus-specific cell niches within a continuum of CD8+ T cell phenotypes.

Authors:  Evan W Newell; Natalia Sigal; Sean C Bendall; Garry P Nolan; Mark M Davis
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  ISAC's classification results file format.

Authors:  Josef Spidlen; Chris Bray; Ryan R Brinkman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  Metal-Containing Polystyrene Beads as Standards for Mass Cytometry.

Authors:  Ahmed I Abdelrahman; Olga Ornatsky; Dmitry Bandura; Vladimir Baranov; Robert Kinach; Sheng Dai; Stuart C Thickett; Scott Tanner; Mitchell A Winnik
Journal:  J Anal At Spectrom       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.023

8.  Lanthanide-containing polymer microspheres by multiple-stage dispersion polymerization for highly multiplexed bioassays.

Authors:  Ahmed I Abdelrahman; Sheng Dai; Stuart C Thickett; Olga Ornatsky; Dmitry Bandura; Vladimir Baranov; Mitchell A Winnik
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  High-dimensional analysis of the murine myeloid cell system.

Authors:  Burkhard Becher; Andreas Schlitzer; Jinmiao Chen; Florian Mair; Hermi R Sumatoh; Karen Wei Weng Teng; Donovan Low; Christiane Ruedl; Paola Riccardi-Castagnoli; Michael Poidinger; Melanie Greter; Florent Ginhoux; Evan W Newell
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.

Authors:  Nima Aghaeepour; Greg Finak; Holger Hoos; Tim R Mosmann; Ryan Brinkman; Raphael Gottardo; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  69 in total

1.  An integrated framework using high-dimensional mass cytometry and fluorescent flow cytometry identifies discrete B cell subsets in patients with red meat allergy.

Authors:  Kelly M Cox; Scott P Commins; Brian J Capaldo; Lisa J Workman; Thomas A E Platts-Mills; El-Ad D Amir; Josephine A Lannigan; Alexander J Schuyler; Loren D Erickson
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.018

2.  Mass cytometry deep phenotyping of human mononuclear phagocytes and myeloid-derived suppressor cells from human blood and bone marrow.

Authors:  Mikael Roussel; P Brent Ferrell; Allison R Greenplate; Faustine Lhomme; Simon Le Gallou; Kirsten E Diggins; Douglas B Johnson; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.962

3.  Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan L McCarthy; Aundrietta D Duncan; Michelle C Barton
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Human Germinal Center B Cells Differ from Naïve and Memory B Cells in CD40 Expression and CD40L-Induced Signaling Response.

Authors:  Kanutte Huse; Cara E Wogsland; Hannah G Polikowsky; Kirsten E Diggins; Erlend B Smeland; June H Myklebust; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 5.  Mass cytometry: blessed with the curse of dimensionality.

Authors:  Evan W Newell; Yang Cheng
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 6.  Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data.

Authors:  Yvan Saeys; Sofie Van Gassen; Bart N Lambrecht
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 7.  Single-cell technologies in reproductive immunology.

Authors:  Jessica Vazquez; Irene M Ong; Aleksandar K Stanic
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Identification of functionally primitive and immunophenotypically distinct subpopulations in secondary acute myeloid leukemia by mass cytometry.

Authors:  Shovik Bandyopadhyay; Jared S Fowles; Liyang Yu; Daniel A C Fisher; Stephen T Oh
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.058

9.  Computational Immune Monitoring Reveals Abnormal Double-Negative T Cells Present across Human Tumor Types.

Authors:  Allison R Greenplate; Daniel D McClanahan; Brian K Oberholtzer; Deon B Doxie; Caroline E Roe; Kirsten E Diggins; Nalin Leelatian; Megan L Rasmussen; Mark C Kelley; Vivian Gama; Peter J Siska; Jeffrey C Rathmell; P Brent Ferrell; Douglas B Johnson; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 11.151

10.  Multiparameter analysis of stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A comparison of mass and fluorescence cytometry.

Authors:  Katherine J Nicholas; Allison R Greenplate; David K Flaherty; Brittany K Matlock; Juan San Juan; Rita M Smith; Jonathan M Irish; Spyros A Kalams
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.