Literature DB >> 28233618

Assessment of human dietary exposure to arsenic through rice.

Matthew A Davis1, Antonio J Signes-Pastor2, Maria Argos3, Francis Slaughter2, Claire Pendergrast2, Tracy Punshon2, Anala Gossai2, Habibul Ahsan4, Margaret R Karagas5.   

Abstract

Rice accumulates 10-fold higher inorganic arsenic (i-As), an established human carcinogen, than other grains. This review summarizes epidemiologic studies that examined the association between rice consumption and biomarkers of arsenic exposure. After reviewing the literature we identified 20 studies, among them included 18 observational and 2 human experimental studies that reported on associations between rice consumption and an arsenic biomarker. Among individuals not exposed to contaminated water, rice is a source of i-As exposure - rice consumption has been consistently related to arsenic biomarkers, and the relationship has been clearly demonstrated in experimental studies. Early-life i-As exposure is of particular concern due to its association with lifelong adverse health outcomes. Maternal rice consumption during pregnancy also has been associated with infant toenail total arsenic concentrations indicating that dietary exposure during pregnancy results in fetal exposure. Thus, the collective evidence indicates that rice is an independent source of arsenic exposure in populations around the world and highlights the importance of investigating its affect on health.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic metabolites; Bio monitoring; Dietary; Exposure; Rice; Toenails; Urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233618      PMCID: PMC5502079          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


1. Introduction

Arsenic is a ubiquitous metalloid and its presence in the environment is the result of both natural geologic processes and environmental pollution. Human exposure to arsenic has been associated with a broad range of adverse effects on health (IARC, 2004; Sharma et al., 2014; UN FAO/WHO, 2011). It is estimated that 140 million people worldwide are exposed to inorganic arsenic (i-As) primarily through the consumption of unregulated contaminated water — the known primary source of i-As human exposure (States et al., 2011). Adverse health effects associated with high levels of i-As exposure are well recognized. However, recent studies have reported an elevated risk of certain cancers, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory conditions, and diabetes associated with relatively low levels of i-As exposure (Amaral et al., 2012; EFSA, 2009; Ettinger et al., 2009; Karagas et al., 2004, 2001; Leonardi et al., 2012; Navas-Acien et al., 2008; Sohel et al., 2009). Such associations have been observed in populations who were known to consume water with concentrations of i-As well below the World Health Organization’s guideline of 10 μg/L. While seafood is a major dietary source of exposure due to high levels of arsenobetaine, a non-toxic organic form of arsenic, fruits, fruit juices, and grains are among the primary dietary sources of i-As exposure, especially in regions with access to water low in i-As (Meacher et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2010; Yost et al., 2004). Rice, a crop that is grown in flooded plains, is of particular concern as the plant has been shown to bioaccumulate i-As at approximately 10-fold higher rate than other grains such as wheat and barley (Ma et al., 2008; Meharg et al., 2009; Mitani et al., 2009; Williams et al., 2007a, b; Williams et al., 2005). Nevertheless, wide variations exist in the amount and type of arsenic found in rice dependent on both where the plant was grown and the rice species (Bastias et al., 2010; Norton et al., 2012; Signes-Pastor et al., 2016a; Williams et al., 2007a, b; Williams et al., 2005). For instance, rice grown in the U.S. contains higher amounts of total arsenic (t-As) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) — the primary arsenic metabolite found in rice (Meharg et al., 2009; Williams et al., 2005). High concentrations of i-As have also been found in rice-based products, including those consumed by infants and young children, who are especially vulnerable to the adverse health effects of i-As exposure (Farzan et al., 2013; Jackson et al., 2012; Signes-Pastor et al., 2016b). In the context of dietary i-As exposure assessment, it is important to differentiate between estimates of intake of contaminated food versus biological measures of internal dose. Numerous studies have explored the relationship between diet and arsenic biomarker concentrations; however, only a few accounted for arsenic intake from water by direct measurement of water samples (e.g., Gilbert-Diamond et al., 2011). The most common methods to measure dietary intake include the 24-hour food recall (administered via an interview or a food diary) and food frequency questionnaires (FFQ). The gold standard of dietary intake assessment is multiple 24-hour food diaries. However, both 24-hour food diaries and food frequency questionnaires rely on self-report, and thus are prone to measurement error (Orloff et al., 2009; Tao and Bolger, 1999). For the present study, we performed a comprehensive literature review of published studies that examined the relationship between rice consumption and arsenic exposure using human biomarkers. Table 1 summarizes the relevant articles included in this review.
Table 1

Summary of studies that examined associations between rice consumption and human exposure to arsenic.

OrderReferencesStudy designStudy populationRice intake assessmentRice arsenic levelWater arsenic levelBiomarkersResults
1He and Zheng, 2010ExperimentalFemale adults (n = 2).Mass balance of arsenic metabolites. Wheat diet (5 days) vs rice-based diet (418 g of rice/day - 5 days)101 μg/kg of i-As, 25 μg/kg DMA, and 7.5 μg/kg other arsenic species.≤1 μg/kgMixture of two spot urine samples, the first in the morning and last in the evening.Urinary t-As concentration doubled with rice diet in the two participants (from the mean value of 8.2 μg to 16.3 μg). DMA dominated urinary arsenic speciation. The mean percentage of rice-diet ingested arsenic excreted in urine was ~63%.
2Meharg et al., 2014ExperimentalMale adults (n = 9).Mass balance of arsenic metabolites. 6 participants that followed a rice diet (300 g/day - 5 days) vs 3 participants that did not consume rice (5 days).99 μg/kg of i-As, 99 μg/kg of DMA, and 3 μg/kg MMA.Distilled waterSpot urine, and 24-hour urine pass for participants consuming rice.Urinary t-As was 7.3-fold higher after 4 days consuming rice (from 6.8 μg/L to 49.9 μg/L). Percentage of urinary DMA, and MMA increased 65%, and 6%, respectively after rice consumption. The percentage of urinary i-As decreased ~ 20% after rice consumption. The percentage of rice ingested arsenic excreted in urine was ~ 40%.
3Lovreglio et al., 2012Prospective cohort studyAdults Caucasian males resident in a coastal area of southern Italy (n = 12).Daily food diary starting 3 days before the start of the study and continuing throughout the study period.-Refers to regulation (<10 μg/kg)Morning spot urine samples for 10 consecutive days.Rice intake was not shown to influence either urinary excretion of i-As and its methylated species. Rice played a minor role in participants’ diet.
4deCastro et al., 2014Cross-sectional studyAdults, adolescents, and children from NHANES (n = 8300).24-Hour dietary recall including rice, rice cakes/crackers, and rice beverage consumption.--Spot urineChildren consumption of rice and adolescents consumption of rice cakes/crackers was related to an increase in urinary DMA (positive regression slopes of 115 and 872, respectively). An increase in urinary MMA was also associated with an increase of rice beverages in adults, and an increase of rice cakes/crackers in children and adolescents (positive regression slopes of 6.4, 65.5, and 103, respectively).
5Davis et al., 2012Cross-sectional studyChildren from the NHANES (n = 2323).48-Hour dietary questionnaire. Rice eater defined as 1/4 cup of cooked rice per day.--Spot urineChildren “rice eaters” had 1.6-fold higher t-As urinary compared to those non “rice eaters” (from 8.9 μg/L to 5.5 μg/L). An increase of 14.2% of urinary t-As was associated with each 1/4 cup of cooked rice consumption (14.1 g dry weight).
6Kordas et al., 2016Cross sectional studyYoung children of 5–8 years of age (n = 328) residing in Montevideo, Uruguay.Two 24-hour dietary recalls including rice consumption. Children defined as consuming <5 g rice/day vs children ≥5 g rice/day-0.45 μg/LSpot urineSum of urinary arsenic concentrations (iAs, MMA, and DMA) increased from 11.0 μg/L to 13.5 μg/L with rice consumption ≥5 g rice/day.
7Davis et al., 2014aCross-sectional studyAdults and children from NHANES (n = 20.497).48-Hour recall dietary questionnaire including rice consumption.--Spot urineAssociation between rice consumption and urinary t-As among both children and adults. An increase of 10 g (dry weight) rice per day was associated with an increase of 9.6% urinary t-As, and an increase of 8.6% in urinary DMA.
8Wu et al., 2015Cross-sectional studyU.S. adults (n = 6677) belonging to NHANES.48-Hour recall dietary questionnaire including white and brown rice consumption.--Spot urineIntake of white or brown rice were both associated with ~ 1.6-fold higher urinary sum of arsenic concentrations excluding arsenobetaine
compared to those who did not consume rice (from 7.9 μg/L to 13.1 μg/L). Among rice eaters, urinary sum of arsenic metabolites excluding arsenobetaine did not differ between participants who primarily consume white rice or brown rice.
9Gilbert-Diamond et al., 2011Cross sectional studyPregnant women (n = 229) residing in New Hampshire.72-Hour recall dietary questionnaire including rice consumption.-Range from ≤0.07 μg/L to100 μg/L. Highly right-skewed.Spot urineUrinary t-As was 5.3 μg/L for rice consumers and 3.4 μg/L for non-consumers. Rice consumers had 0.07 μg/L higher i-As, 0.18 μg/L higher MMA, and 1.25 μg/L higher DMA than non-rice consumers. Rice consumption increased urinary loge t-As with a β of 0.009 (95% CI: 0.005, 0.013).
10Davis et al., 2014bCross-sectional studyMother-infant pairs (n = 170) residing in New Hampshire, and mother-infant pairs (n = 130) belonging to a validation cohort from Rhode Island.72-Hour recall dietary questionnaire including rice consumption.--ToenailsToenail t-As concentration from infants exposed to rice consumption during pregnancy was 0.09 μg/g compared to 0.06 μg/g for those non-exposed. An increase of 1/4 cooked rice cups/day during pregnancy was associated with a 16.9% increase in infants toenail t-As concentration.
11Cascio et al., 2011Prospective cohort studyAdults living in United Kingdom (U.K.) (n = 49).Food frequency questionnaire. Bangladeshi with high consumption of rice (n = 37) vs white Caucasians with lower consumption of rice (n = 12)-Refers to regulation (<10 μg/kg)Spot urineU.K. Bangladeshi community had 30-fold higher rice consumption than U.K. white Caucasians. Similar urinary t-As concentrations were found for the Bangladeshi group (28.4 μg/L) and the white Caucasians group (20.6 μg/L). Urinary DMA and i-As concentrations for the U.K. Bangladeshi community was 5- and 2.5-fold higher than for the U.K. white Caucasians.
12Wei et al., 2014Cross-sectional studyU.S. adults (n = 3027) belonging to the NHANES.Food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption. Adults classified as low and high rice consumers (<twice a week vs ≥twice a week).--Spot urineParticipants that consumed rice more than twice a week had 1.1- and 1.2-fold higher urinary t-As (from 2.21 to 2.42 μg/g creatinine) and DMA (from 1.32 to 1.58 μg/g creatinine) compared to those that consume rice less than twice a week, respectively.
13Melkonian et al., 2013Prospective cohort studyAdults living in Araihazar, Bangladesh (n = 18.470, with a subset of 4517 with urinary As metabolites).Food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption.-50% participants with access to well water <50 μg As/L.Spot urineRice consumption was positively associated with urinary t-As (Multivariate model β = 0.041) (95% CI: 0.032, 0.051).
14Park and Lee, 2013Cross sectional studyKorean adults (n = 3404) residing in South Korea belonging to the Korean NHANES.Semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption.--Spot urineRice consumption was associated with a higher urinary t-As concentration. The adjusted means urinary t-As for low, moderate, and high rice consumption were 99.3, 105.4, and 120.1 μg/g creatinine.
15Rivera-Nuñez et al., 2012Cross-sectional studyAdults (n = 343) residing in Michigan belonging to the case-control study of bladder cancer in Michigan.Food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption.-≤50 μg/LSpot urineRice consumption was positively associated with sum of arsenic concentrations (i-As, MMA, and DMA) with β and R2 of 7.51 and 0.008, respectively.
16Karagas et al., 2016Cross sectional studyInfants (n = 759) belonging to the NHBCS.Questionnaire and diaries including rice and rice-based products.Ranging from 4.6 to 201 μg i-As/kg.Mainly <10 μg/kgSpot urineUrinary t-As was nearly double (from 4.97 μg/L to 9.53 μg/L) for infants consuming rice-based products compared to those that did not consume rice. Infant rice cereals and rice-based snacks were positively associated with urinary log10 t-As according to the estimate, β = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.34) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.15), respectively.
17Cleland et al., 2009Descriptive studyKorean women adults (n = 108) living in Washington State.Food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption rates, which is an important food item in the Korean community.-<2 μg/LSpot urine and hairEstimated arsenic exposure from rice was a statistically significant predictor of sum of the urinary arsenic species, but only explained a small percentage of the variability.
18Cottingham et al., 2013Cross-sectional studyAdults residing in New Hampshire residents (n = 852) belonging to the case-control study of bladder and skin cancer in New Hampshire.Annual food frequency questionnaire recording average daily consumption of 120 different diet items.-<1 μg/L vs ≥ 1 μg/LToenailToenail t-As increased with household water arsenic concentration. No clear relationship was found between toenail t-As and rice consumption, which may be related to the low rice consumption of the study population (adjusted model β for brown rice = 0.23, p-value = 0.29; β for white rice = 0.065, p-value = 0.67).
19Slotnick et al., 2007Cross-sectional studyAdults control participants (n = 440) belonging to the case-control of As in drinking water and bladder cancer in 11 counties o Michigan.Food frequency questionnaire including rice consumption.-Range from <LOD to 99.9 μg/L with a median of 0.38 μg/L.ToenailRice consumption was negatively associated with As toenail concentration (β = −0.137, R2 = 0.017).
20MacIntosh et al., 1997Cross sectional study nested within prospective cohortFemales and males adults (n = 969) belonging to the 1984–1986 Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study.Semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.--ToenailRegression coefficient for brown rice consumption per 1 unit increase in daily average servings 0.494 (p-value = 0.0457)

2. Biomarkers of human exposure to arsenic

Biomarkers are used to estimate internal dose because they: (1) represent an aggregate measure that accounts for all routes of exposure and (2) are independent of self-report. Human biological specimens used to estimate internal dose of arsenic exposure include urine, blood, nails, and hair (Marchiset-Ferlay et al., 2012). Upon ingestion, i-As is rapidly metabolized by the body to monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) and DMA. MMA and DMA are among the end metabolites of the i-As metabolism which may be excreted in the urine unchanged from direct dietary exposure (Vahter, 2002). Urinary arsenic concentration measured in urine spot samples, normalized by creatinine or specific gravity to account for differences in urinary dilution, is a commonly used biomarker of short-term exposure. However, among individuals with consistent patterns of arsenic exposure urinary arsenic concentration appears to be a reliable source of long-term exposure as well (Kile et al., 2009; Marchiset-Ferlay et al., 2012; Navas-Acien et al., 2009). The measurement of specific arsenic species in urine is performed by ion exchange high performance liquid chromatography coupled with either inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS) or hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HPLC-HG-AFS). Identification of specific arsenic species in urine is useful to both assess dietary exposure and explore arsenic metabolism (Chowdhury et al., 2003; Concha et al., 1998; Fängström et al., 2009). In addition, arsenic speciation in urine allows the subtraction of species considered relatively non-toxic including arsenobetaine and arsenocholine, predominantly found in seafood products (Navas-Acien et al., 2011). To a lesser extent human blood has been used as a biomarker of short-term arsenic exposure (Hall et al., 2007, 2006). Human nail (both fingernail and toenail) and hair samples have been extensively used as a biomarker of long-term i-As exposure since unmetabolized i-As tends to be attracted to negative sulfhydryl-groups found in keratin-rich tissues of the integumentary system (Mandal et al., 2003; Slotnick and Nriagu, 2006). The use of hair and nail specimens has the added advantage of being easy to collect (e.g., toenail clippings are of low cost to collect from study participants). However, measurement of t-As in hair and nails (that represents primarily i-As) is potentially less sensitive than arsenic measured in urine. Concentration of t-As in nails and hair tend to provide a better estimate of long-term exposure than arsenic measured in urine due to their growth rate. Nevertheless, considerable care must be taken during nail and hair sample collection and laboratory analysis to avoid external contamination (Mandal et al., 2003). For instance, nails must be thoroughly washed prior to chemical digestion in the laboratory to remove trace contamination of nail polish, dirt or other products.

3. Literature review

3.1. Experimental studies

Epidemiologic evidence points to rice being an independent contributor to dietary i-As exposure. Bioaccessibility of arsenic in rice has been evaluated using in vitro gastro intestinal digestion simulation procedures. These studies have found that between 53% and 102% of t-As in rice is bioavailable (He et al., 2012; Signes-Pastor et al., 2012). One experiment followed two participants who, while consuming ≤ 1 μg/L arsenic water, were exposed to a wheat-based diet for five days and then switched to a rice-based diet (418 g/day) for another five days (He and Zheng, 2010). The two study participants’ urinary t-As concentrations doubled (primarily urinary DMA) upon switching from the wheat-based to the rice-based diet — from a mean of 8.2 μg of t-As during the wheat-based diet to 16.3 μg of t-As during the rice-based diet. It was estimated that approximately 63% of the t-As ingested from rice was excreted in the urine. A 7.3-fold increase in urinary t-As concentration (from 6.8 μg/L to 49.9 μg/L) that consisted primarily of DMA was reported in a study including six experimental and three control participants after following a five-day rice diet (300 g/day) (Meharg et al., 2014). In this study the five-day rice diet was prepared with rice containing i-As and DMA at a ratio of 1:1 and cooked with deionized water. The authors estimated that 40% of t-As ingested by consuming rice was excreted in the urine. Variation was observed in an individual’s concentrations of t-As urine concentrations following a standardized rice portion, as well as urinary t-As excretion over time.

3.2. Child and adult (non-pregnant) populations

In the non-experimental setting, one of the most common used methods to estimate dietary intake is the 24-hour dietary recall. This method includes having a participant recall everything consumed in the previous day via either an interview or by a diet diary. The 24-hour dietary recall using an in-person questionnaire interview has been used in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The NHANES is a survey of U.S. non-institutionalized population that also collects objective health measurements designed to make national estimates on diet and health. Several studies have used the NHANES data to examine the association between food intake and urinary arsenic concentrations. These studies reported associations between rice intake and higher t-As exposure in both children and adults (Davis et al., 2012; Davis et al., 2014a; deCastro et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2015). Using NHANES data, rice and rice cakes/crackers intake in g/day was independently associated with an increase of urinary MMA and DMA concentrations among both younger (6–11 years) and older (12–19 years) children (deCastro et al., 2014). In this study, an increase of urinary DMA and MMA (untransformed β =105.6 and 5.6 for DMA and MMA, respectively p-value < 0.15 for both) also was associated with rice beverage consumption in adults between 20 and 84 years old. Using a combination of the NHANES data and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Commodity Intake Database, it was found that children 6–17 years old consuming rice had almost 2-fold higher urinary t-As — median urinary arsenic concentration of 8.9 μg/L compared to 5.5 μg/L among those non-rice consumers (Davis et al., 2012). Adjusted for other factors, an increase of ¼ cup of cooked rice per day (14.1 g dry weight) was associated with a 14.2% increase in urinary t-As concentration (Davis et al., 2012). In a follow-up study, the same authors found that an increase of 10 g of dry rice per day was associated with an increase of 9.6% urinary t-As, and an increase of 8.6% urinary DMA (Davis et al., 2014a). In both studies the majority of study participants reported to consume water from public sources, which due to regulation is expected to have relatively low i-As concentrations (<10 μg/L). Another study used NHANES data to examine the association between brown and polished white rice intake separately and urinary arsenic (both t-As and i-As) concentrations in adults (Wu et al., 2015). Both white and brown rice consumption were associated with higher urinary t-As. However, urinary t-As excluding arsenobetaine did not differ between participants who primarily consume white versus brown rice. Mean urinary concentrations of the sum of arsenic metabolites excluding arsenobetaine were 11.5 μg/L among participants who ate <1 cup/day white rice, 13.1 μg/L among those who ate ≥1 cup/day white rice, and 7.9 μg/L among non-rice eaters. For brown rice eaters, the mean urinary i-As concentrations were 10.9 μg/L among those who ate <1 cup/day brown rice only and 13.1 μg/L for those who ate ≥1 cup/day brown rice. The lack of an observed difference between white and brown rice was unexpected. White rice is known to contain less i-As than brown rice as brown rice tends to accumulates arsenic in the outer layers of the pericarp and aleurone, portions of the grain that are removed during the polishing process (Meharg et al., 2008). In the one contrasting study of only 12 adults, whose diets comprised a relatively small proportion of rice, rice intake did not appear to affect either urinary excretion of i-As and its methylated species (Lovreglio et al., 2012). The FFQ is another common method used to estimate diet in particular long-term dietary patterns (e.g., over the past year). Consequently, among those with variable diets, it may not accurately represent recent, short-term intake — e.g., be reflective of the period of urinary arsenic excretion. The FFQ has been used to examine the association between diet and urinary arsenic concentration among Bangladeshi populations living in the United Kingdom (U.K.) — a group known to consume high amounts of rice (Cascio et al., 2011). Indeed, the Bangladeshi population living in the U.K. had up to 30-fold higher rice consumption compared to Caucasians residing in the U.K. Furthermore, urinary DMA and i-As concentrations were 5- and 2.5-fold higher for the Bangladeshi population (median of 16.9 μg DMA/L and 0.63 μg i-As/L) than for Caucasians (median of 3.16 μg DMA/L and 0.25 μg i-As/L), respectively. Using NHANES, which also collected FFQ data, another study classified U.S. adults according to their rice frequency consumption as low (twice a week) (Wei et al., 2014). Those with high rice consumption had higher mean urinary t-As (2.4 μg/g) and DMA (1.6 μg/g) creatinine-adjusted concentrations compared to those with lower rice intake (mean urinary t-As and DMA creatinine-adjusted concentrations of 2.2 and 1.3 μg/g respectively). A similar trend was found in a study population of adults residing in Michigan, U.S. (Rivera-Nuñez et al., 2012). While individuals who reported consuming rice in the FFQ were found to have higher urinary t-As concentrations than those who did not report consuming rice, rice explained only a small percentage of the variability in t-As concentrations (Rivera-Nuñez et al., 2012). In a large prospective cohort study of adults residing in Araihazar, Bangladesh, spot urine samples were collected along with a 39-item FFQ that inquired about rice consumption (Melkonian et al., 2013). Nearly half of the study population (n = 18.470) was exposed to i-As contaminated drinking water >50 μg/L and amount of rice intake was positively associated with urinary t-As concentration (β = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.05). A clear correlation between rice consumption estimated by a FFQ and urinary t-As concentrations also has been reported for both the Korean population living in the U.S. and residing in South Korea (Cleland et al., 2009; Park and Lee, 2013). Toenail t-As concentration, that represents long-term exposure particularly to i-As, has also been related to rice intake. To our knowledge, one of the first research studies on dietary exposure to arsenic used data from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and reported that consumption of brown rice (estimated using a FFQ) was positively associated with toenail t-As concentration (β = 0.40, p-value = 0.11) (MacIntosh et al., 1997). A more recent study including participants from a case-control study of bladder and skin cancer in New Hampshire found that toenail t-As concentration increased with household water i-As concentration, but did not identify a relationship between rice consumption and toenail t-As concentration (for brown rice adjusted β = 0.23, p-value = 0.29 and white rice β = 0.065, p-value = 0.67) (Cottingham et al., 2013). The lack of a relationship in this study may have resulted from the overall low rice consumption of the study population (only 1–3 times per month). Similar results were found in a case-control study carried out in 11 counties of Michigan where rice intake was negatively associated (β = −0.137, p-value <0.05) with toenail t-As concentration (Slotnick et al., 2007). In this study the authors used an FFQ where study participants were asked on average over the past year how often they consumed foods including soup, rice, and pasta. The authors report the negative association between rice and toenail arsenic may have been due to dietary intake of other foods that confounded the observed relationship.

3.3. Pregnancy and early childhood

Exposure to arsenic during pregnancy and early childhood is of particular concern due to the vulnerability of the fetus, infants, and young children to environmental contaminants. There is some evidence that exposure i-As early in life may impact growth and health throughout the lifespan (Farzan et al., 2013; IARC, 2004). It is known that i-As crosses the placental barrier and appears in fetal tissue. Thus maternal exposure during pregnancy is an important area of inquiry. Dietary i-As exposure has been evaluated extensively in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study (NHBCS) — an ongoing prospective birth cohort study being conducted in New Hampshire, U.S. where low-level i-As exposure is known to occur (Davis et al., 2014b; Gilbert-Diamond et al., 2011; Karagas et al., 2016). In these studies rice consumption was estimated using a 3-day food diary and spot urinary samples were obtained from women during pregnancy. Mothers who consumed rice had 0.07 μg/L higher urinary i-As, 0.18 μg/L higher urinary MMA, and 1.25 μg/L higher urinary DMA compared to non-rice eaters after adjustment for estimated arsenic intake through the drinking water (Gilbert-Diamond et al., 2011). Among mother-infant pairs it was found that maternal rice intake, also determined with a 3-day food diary, was associated with infants toenail t-As concentration (Davis et al., 2014a, b). Specifically, an increase of 1/4 cup of rice per day was associated with a 16.9% increase in infants toenail t-As concentration indicating that maternal consumption of rice relates fetal exposure, and that infant toenails represent this exposure. Among one-year old infants participating in the NHBCS, those who were reported to consume rice-based products had mean urinary t-As concentration nearly twice that of those who did not consume rice-based products (5.8 μg/L versus 2.8 μg/L respectively) (Karagas et al., 2016). A similar trend was found among a sample of children between the ages of 5 to 8 years old residing in Montevideo, Uruguay, whose rice intake was estimated using two 24-hour food recall periods (Kordas et al., 2016).

4. Conclusion

Differences in study design, i.e., methods of characterizing both arsenic exposure and rice consumption, geographic and ethnic differences in the study populations, and ages of the study participants all provide challenges to directly compare estimates of the association between rice intake and arsenic exposure. Nevertheless, across diverse populations, studies have consistently found positive associations between rice intake and arsenic exposure. These associations have been reported for infants, adolescents and adults. Most notably, the association between rice intake and arsenic exposure using biomarkers such as urinary arsenic (that represent an estimate of internal dose) has been demonstrated in two experimental studies where participants followed a controlled rice diet. Maternal rice intake during pregnancy also has been associated with infant toenail arsenic concentration at birth, suggesting in utero exposure occurs by rice consumption during pregnancy. Collectively, evidence points to rice being an independent source of arsenic exposure in populations around the world underscoring the importance of strategies to prevent this exposure and understanding its impact on human health.
  60 in total

1.  Seafood intake and urine concentrations of total arsenic, dimethylarsinate and arsenobetaine in the US population.

Authors:  Ana Navas-Acien; Kevin A Francesconi; Ellen K Silbergeld; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food. Prepared by the Sixty-fourth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).

Authors: 
Journal:  FAO Food Nutr Pap       Date:  2006

3.  Arsenic concentration and speciation in infant formulas and first foods.

Authors:  Brian P Jackson; Vivien F Taylor; Tracy Punshon; Kathryn L Cottingham
Journal:  Pure Appl Chem       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Strong positive associations between seafood, vegetables, and alcohol with blood mercury and urinary arsenic levels in the Korean adult population.

Authors:  Sunmin Park; Byung-Kook Lee
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire-food composition approach for estimating dietary intake of inorganic arsenic and methylmercury.

Authors:  D L MacIntosh; P L Williams; D J Hunter; L A Sampson; S C Morris; W C Willett; E B Rimm
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Probabilistic Modeling of Dietary Arsenic Exposure and Dose and Evaluation with 2003-2004 NHANES Data.

Authors:  Jianping Xue; Valerie Zartarian; Sheng-Wei Wang; Shi V Liu; Panos Georgopoulos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Association of Rice and Rice-Product Consumption With Arsenic Exposure Early in Life.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Vicki Sayarath; Brian P Jackson; Carol L Folt; Kathryn L Cottingham
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Transporters of arsenite in rice and their role in arsenic accumulation in rice grain.

Authors:  Jian Feng Ma; Naoki Yamaji; Namiki Mitani; Xiao-Yan Xu; Yu-Hong Su; Steve P McGrath; Fang-Jie Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Arsenic exposure within the Korean community (United States) based on dietary behavior and arsenic levels in hair, urine, air, and water.

Authors:  Bill Cleland; Ami Tsuchiya; David A Kalman; Russell Dills; Thomas M Burbacher; Jim W White; Elaine M Faustman; Koenraad Mariën
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Diet and toenail arsenic concentrations in a New Hampshire population with arsenic-containing water.

Authors:  Kathryn L Cottingham; Roxanne Karimi; Joann F Gruber; M Scot Zens; Vicki Sayarath; Carol L Folt; Tracy Punshon; J Steven Morris; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  22 in total

1.  Concentrations of urinary arsenic species in relation to rice and seafood consumption among children living in Spain.

Authors:  Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Jesus Vioque; Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz; Manus Carey; Manoli García de la Hera; Jordi Sunyer; Maribel Casas; Isolina Riaño-Galán; Adonina Tardón; Sabrina Llop; Rubén Amorós; Pilar Amiano; José R Bilbao; Margaret R Karagas; Andrew A Meharg
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  An assessment of arsenic hazard in groundwater-soil-rice system in two villages of Nadia district, West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Munish Kumar Upadhyay; Arnab Majumdar; Anil Barla; Sutapa Bose; Sudhakar Srivastava
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Rice Intake and Emerging Concerns on Arsenic in Rice: a Review of the Human Evidence and Methodologic Challenges.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Matt Davis; Catherine M Bulka; Francis Slaughter; Despina Karalis; Maria Argos; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

4.  Mitigating dietary arsenic exposure: Current status in the United States and recommendations for an improved path forward.

Authors:  Keeve E Nachman; Gary L Ginsberg; Mark D Miller; Carolyn J Murray; Anne E Nigra; Claire B Pendergrast
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Rice Consumption and Subclinical Lung Disease in US Adults: Observational Evidence From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Tiffany R Sanchez; Elizabeth C Oelsner; David J Lederer; Christian M Lo Cascio; Miranda R Jones; Maria Grau-Perez; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Matthew S Perzanowski; R Graham Barr; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Inorganic arsenic exposure and neuropsychological development of children of 4-5 years of age living in Spain.

Authors:  Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Jesús Vioque; Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz; Manus Carey; Miguel García-Villarino; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Adonina Tardón; Loreto Santa-Marina; Amaia Irizar; Maribel Casas; Mònica Guxens; Sabrina Llop; Raquel Soler-Blasco; Manoli García-de-la-Hera; Margaret R Karagas; Andrew A Meharg
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Association between rice consumption and risk of cancer incidence in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Tiffany R Sanchez; Yaa Asantewaa Kafui Klu; Jeanine M Genkinger; James V Lacey; Nadia T Chung; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Effect of cooking on arsenic concentration in rice.

Authors:  Oliva Atiaga; Luis M Nunes; Xosé L Otero
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Biological Properties of Vitamins of the B-Complex, Part 1: Vitamins B1, B2, B3, and B5.

Authors:  Marcel Hrubša; Tomáš Siatka; Iveta Nejmanová; Marie Vopršalová; Lenka Kujovská Krčmová; Kateřina Matoušová; Lenka Javorská; Kateřina Macáková; Laura Mercolini; Fernando Remião; Marek Máťuš; Přemysl Mladěnka
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Toenails as a biomarker of exposure to arsenic: A review.

Authors:  Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Enrique Gutiérrez-González; Miguel García-Villarino; Francisco D Rodríguez-Cabrera; Jorge J López-Moreno; Elena Varea-Jiménez; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Marina Pollán; Ana Navas-Acien; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.