Literature DB >> 28233605

Total knee arthroplasty with computer-assisted navigation more closely replicates normal knee biomechanics than conventional surgery.

Jodie A McClelland1, Kate E Webster2, Alankar A Ramteke3, Julian A Feller4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces variability and may improve accuracy in the postoperative static alignment. The effect of navigation on alignment and biomechanics during more dynamic movements has not been investigated.
METHODS: This study compared knee biomechanics during level walking of 121 participants: 39 with conventional TKA, 42 with computer-assisted navigation TKA and 40 unimpaired control participants.
RESULTS: Standing lower-limb alignment was significantly closer to ideal in participants with navigation TKA. During gait, when differences in walking speed were accounted for, participants with conventional TKA had less knee flexion during stance and swing than controls (P<0.01), but there were no differences between participants with navigation TKA and controls for the same variables. Both groups of participants with TKA had lower knee adduction moments than controls (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, there were fewer differences in the biomechanics of computer-assisted navigation TKA patients compared to controls than for patients with conventional TKA. Computer-assisted navigation TKA may restore biomechanics during walking that are closer to normal than conventional TKA.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Computer-assisted navigation; Gait; Osteoarthritis; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233605     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Proven accuracy for a new dynamic gap measurement in navigated TKA.

Authors:  Volkmar Mehliß; Marco Strauch Leira; Agustín Serrano Olaizola; Wolfgang Scior; Heiko Graichen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up.

Authors:  Michele d'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Paolo Barbadoro; Andrea Illuminati; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Holger Bäthis; Paola Kappel; Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer; Matthias Fröhlich; Michael Caspers; Deha Murat Ates
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 5.  After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?

Authors:  Siddharth M Shah
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-11-04

6.  Satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes of TKA aligned using conventional instrumentation for flexion gap balancing with minimal soft tissue release.

Authors:  Michel Bercovy; Luc Kerboull; Jacobus H Müller; Mo Saffarini; Frederic Sailhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.