| Literature DB >> 28231789 |
Md Moshfekus Saleh-E-In1, Nasim Sultana2, Md Matiur Rahim3, Md Aminul Ahsan2, Md Nurul Huda Bhuiyan3, Md Nur Hossain4, Md Mahbubar Rahman5, Sudhangshu Kumar Roy6, Md Rabiul Islam7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicinal herbs are used for the treatment of different ailments since antiquity. Different parts of Anethum sowa L. is used in folk medicine as a carminative for the treatment of flatulence, colic and hiccups of infants and children, antioxidant, antimicrobial and antispasmodic agent. The aim of our present study is to evaluate the chemical composition of the essential oil, proximate and elemental composition, amino acid, fatty acid profile and thermal behaviour of its root part as well as different pharmacological activities like antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity of the root essential oil.Entities:
Keywords: Amino acid; Anethum sowa L; Apiol; Biological activity; Fatty acid; ICP/MS; Thermal analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28231789 PMCID: PMC5324201 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1601-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Operating conditions of Varian ICP-MS
| Parameters | Settings |
|---|---|
|
| |
| RF power | 1.40 kW |
| Plasma Ar flow rate. | 18.0 L min−1 |
| Auxiliary Ar flow rate | 2.25 L min−1 |
| Sheath gas flow | 0.20 L min−1 |
| Nebulizer gas flow | 1.0 L min−1 |
| Sampling depth | 6.50 mm |
| Pump Rate | 5 rpm |
|
| |
| Sampler cone: Nikel | 1.0 mm orifice diameter |
| Skimmer cone: Nikel | 0.5 mm orifice diameter |
Proximate composition of Anethum sowa L. Root
| Characteristics | Percent (%) Composition |
|---|---|
| Moisture (On fresh weight basis) | 78.46 ± 0.23 |
| Dry matter (On fresh weight basis) | 21.54 ± 0.23 |
| Organic content | 94.71 ± 0.12 |
| Ash (On dry weight basis) | 5.29 ± 0.10 |
| Ash (On fresh weight basis) | 1.14 ± 0.01 |
| Acid insoluble ash | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
| Water soluble ash | 1.87 ± 0.00 |
| Nitrogen (Kjeldahl method) | 0.32 ± 0.01 |
| Protein | 2.01 ± 0.07 |
| Crude fibre | 54.09 ± 0.50 |
| Fatty oil (Hot extract) | 1.14 ± 0.01 |
| Fatty oil (Cold extract) | 0.60 ± 0.11 |
| Essential oil (On dry weight basis) | 0.15 ± 0.09 |
| Carbohydrate (Calculated by difference) | 28.53 ± 0.30 |
Data are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fatty acid composition of Anethum sowa L. root extract (cold and hot extracts) by GC
| Fatty acid compounds | Cold extract | Hot extract | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | IA | Relative percentage | R | IA | Relative percentage | ||
| 1. | aMyristic acid (C14:0) | 9.74 | 31956 | 5.24 | 9.751 | 407 | 0.17 |
| 2. | aPalmitic acid (C16:0) | 13.33 | 205940 |
| 13.334 | 74176 |
|
| 3. | aStearic acid (C18:0) | 16.17 | 30015 | 4.93 | 16.176 | 9810 | 4.17 |
| 4. | cOleic acid (C18:1) | 15.83 | 5392 | 0.89 | 15.830 | 41976 |
|
| 5. | bLinoleic acid (C 18:2) | 15.75 | 182845 |
| 15.754 | 55875 |
|
| 6. | aArachidic Acid (C20:0) | 18.80 | 15831 | 2.60 | 18.809 | 4541 | 1.93 |
| 7. | aBehenic acid (C22:0) | 21.24 | 77302 |
| 21.242 | 23580 |
|
| 8. | aLignoceric acid (C24:0) (Tetracosanoic acid) | 23.61 | 59715 |
| 23.612 | 24456 |
|
| Total | 608996 | 100 | 234821 | 100 | |||
| aSaturated (%) | 69.08 | 58.34 | |||||
| bPoly-unsaturated (%) | 30.03 | 23.79 | |||||
| cMono-unsaturated (%) | 0.89 | 17.87 | |||||
| PUFA/SFA | 0.43 | 0.40 | |||||
| AI | 1.771 | 0.77 | |||||
| TI | 2.84 | 1.72 | |||||
R Retention time, IA Individual Area, AI Anthrogenic Index, TI Thrombogenicity Index, PUFA Poly-unsaturated fatty acids, SFA Saturated fatty acids
aSaturated, bPoly-unsaturated, cMono-unsaturated
Amino acid composition (g/100 g crude protein) of Anethum sowa root
| Name of Amino Acids | Sample Retention Time | Standard Retention Time | Sample Individual Area | Standard Individual Area | Concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/100 g DB | g/100 g FB | |||||
| Serine (Ser)b,g | 10.392 | 10.471 | 1361824 | 2701518 | 3.58 | 4.01 |
| Glutamic acid (Glu)b,d |
|
|
|
|
| 21.67 |
| Glycine (Gly)b,g |
|
|
|
|
| 16.26 |
| Alanine (Ala)b,g | 17.360 | 18.191 | 525832 | 1186996 | 3.15 | 3.52 |
| Valine (Val)a,g | 21.543 | 19.752 | 356860 | 1517660 | 1.67 | 1.87 |
| Methionine (Met)a,f,g | 22.448 | 22.300 | 937009 | 1213589 | 5.49 | 6.14 |
| Isoleucine (Ile)a,g | 24.957 | 23.235 | 310181 | 1877608 | 1.17 | 1.31 |
| Leucine (Leu)a,g | 26.182 | 25.570 | 467152 | 1648575 | 2.01 | 2.25 |
| Tyrosine (Tyr)b,c,g | 27.415 | 26.796 | 390655 | 1877669 | 1.47 | 1.65 |
| Histidine (His)a,e | 28.371 | 28.295 | 7778337 | 8098543 | 6.82 | 7.64 |
| Lysine (Lys)a,e |
|
|
|
|
| 19.12 |
| Arginine (Arg)a,e | 33.663 | 33.693 | 473612 | 2266037 | 1.48 | 1.66 |
| Total | 35702337 | 32858261 | 77.87 | 87.14 | ||
| aEssential amino acids | 35.75 | 40.00 | ||||
| bNon Essen. Amino Acids | 42.12 | 47.13 | ||||
| cAromatic Amino Acids | 1.47 | 1.65 | ||||
| dAcidic Amino Acids | 19.37 | 21.67 | ||||
| eBasic Amino Acids | 25.40 | 28.42 | ||||
| fSulphur Amino Acids | 5.49 | 6.14 | ||||
| gNeutral Amino Acids | 33.10 | 37.04 | ||||
| % of essential amino acid in total amino acid | 45.90 | 45.90 | ||||
aEssential amino acids, bNon essn. amino acids, cAromatic amino acid, dAcidic amino acids, eBasic amino acids, fSulphur amino acids, gNeutral amino acids
Essential elemental composition (μg/kg) of Anethum sowa L. root
| Elements |
| RSD % | Instrumental Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution Conc. | DWB (ppb) | FWB (ppb) | |||
| Be | 0.7977 | 2.09 | 1.90 | 2.84 | ICP-MS |
| Ag | 8.039 | 21.10 | 19.23 | 0.97 | ICP-MS |
| Cs | 8.2059 | 21.53 | 19.63 | 1.18 | ICP-MS |
| Bi | 8.2364 | 21.61 | 19.70 | 1.03 | ICP-MS |
| Ga | 9.6419 | 25.30 | 23.07 | 1.18 | ICP-MS |
| Co | 26.1657 | 68.67 | 62.61 | 1.36 | ICP-MS |
| Li | 121.093 | 317.84 | 289.76 | 0.08 | ICP-MS |
| Se | 348.141 | 913.79 | 833.06 | 2.11 | ICP-MS |
| Ni | 452.343 | 1187.30 | 1082.40 | 0.76 | ICP-MS |
RSD Relative Standard Deviation, DWB Dry Weight Basis, FWB Fresh Weight Basis
Essential elemental composition (mg/kg) of Anethum sowa L. root
| Elements |
| RSD % | Instrumental Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution Conc. | DWB (ppm) | FWB (ppm) | |||
| Mn | 6.56 | 17.21 | 15.69 | 0.1 | AAS |
| Al | 53.08 | 139.32 | 127.01 | 0.1 | AAS |
| Fe | 78.82 | 206.88 | 188.60 | 0.1 | AAS |
| Na | 110 | 288.72 | 263.21 | 0.1 | FP |
| K | 490 | 1286.15 | 1172.51 | 0.1 | FP |
| Mg | 2903.21 | 7620.33 | 6947.08 | 0.1 | AAS |
| Ca | 8991.18 | 23600.01 | 21514.95 | 0.1 | AAS |
RSD Relative Standard Deviation, DWB Dry Weight Basis, FWB Fresh Weight Basis
Non-essential elemental composition (μg/kg) of Anethum sowa L. root
| Elements |
| RSD % | Instrumental Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution Conc. | DWB (ppb) | FWB (ppb) | |||
| Cr | ND | ND | ND | ND | ICP-MS |
| Pb | ND | ND | ND | ND | ICP-MS |
| Cd | 14.7679 | 38.76 | 35.33 | 1.54 | ICP-MS |
| As | 16.5858 | 43.53 | 39.68 | 2.88 | ICP-MS |
| Hg | 48.45 | 965.52 | 880.22 | 0.3 | AAS |
RSD Relative Standard Deviation, DWB Dry Weight Basis, FWB Fresh Weight Basis
Results of TG and DTG (mass loss and temperature) of Anethum sowa L. root powder
| Events | TG | DTG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass loss (%) | Tonset-Toffset (OC) | Mass loss (mg/min) | Tonset-Toffset (OC) | |
| First step | 92.7 | Troom-275 | 0.151 | Troom-75.9 |
| Second step | 53.3 | 276–327 | 0.373 | 76–257 |
| Third step | 29.6 | 328–358 | 1.167 | 258–328 |
| % Residue | 25.9 | 359–550 | - | - |
Compound composition (% w/w) in the essential oil and water extract part of Anethum sowa L. root
| SL No. | RI Index | Name of Compounds | Essential oil | Water extract part | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | Conc. (%) | R | Conc. (%) | |||
| 1 | 349 | Ethylene oxide | - | ND | 16.249 | 0.294 |
| 2 | 653 | Glycidol | - | ND | 7.893 | 0.264 |
| 3 | 707 | n-Pentanal | 9.441 | 0.053 | - | ND |
| 4 | 721 | Isobutyl acetate | - | ND | 3.769 | 3.733 |
| 5 | 766 | β-Butyrolactone | - | ND | 3.228 | 5.131 |
| 6 | 767 | 2,3,3-Trimethyl hexane | 3.677 | 0.068 | - | ND |
| 7 | 794 | Toluene | 3.606 | 2.40 | 3.635 | 3.327 |
| 8 | 806 | n-Hexanal | 4.165 | 0.166 | - | ND |
| 9 | 831 | Furfural | - | ND | 4.800 | 0.48 |
| 10 | 905 | n-Heptanal | 6.021 | 0.148 | - | ND |
| 11 | 907 | p-Xylene | 5.422 | 0.895 | - | ND |
| 12 | 1005 | n-Octanal | 7.885 | 0.238 | - | ND |
| 13 | 1081 | 2-Phenyl-acetaldehyde | 8.653 | 0.106 | - | ND |
| 14 | 1197 | p-Cymen-8-ol | 11.026 | 0.878 | 11.027 | 1.109 |
| 15 | 1224 | 4-Thujen-2-alpha-yl acetate | 11.323 | 0.082 | - | ND |
| 16. | 1260 | Cyclohexane, 3-hexyl | - | ND | 17.730 | 0.50 |
| 17. | 1294 | 2-Aminoundecane | 15.164 | 0.244 | - | ND |
| 18. | 1304 | m-Diaminobenzene | 18.758 | 10.446 | 18.755 | 8.778 |
| 19. | 1334 | (+/-)-Norephedrine | 18.440 | 0.103 | - | ND |
| 20. | 1421 | Thymol acetate | 12.773 | 0.878 | - | ND |
| 21 | 1516 | Myristicin | 15.900 | 0.868 | 15.900 | 0.716 |
| 22 | 1550 | Elemicin | 16.251 | 0.426 | - | ND |
| 23 | 1705 | Apiol | 17.897 |
| 17.887 |
|
| 24 | 2187 | 3,4-Dimethyl-benzoic acid 4-tert-bytyl-phenyl ester | - | ND | 17.614 | 0.881 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | ||||
RI Index Retention Index (compounds rearrangement with their retention index), R Retention time ND Not Detected
Concentration of different compound classes of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil and water extractive part
| Sl No. | Compound classes | Essential oil part (%) | Water extract part (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hydrocarbon | 3.363 |
|
| 2. | Aldehyde | 0.658 | ND |
| 3. | Alcohol | ND | 0.264 |
| 4. | Lactone | ND |
|
| 5. | Ester | 0.96 |
|
| 6. | Oxide | ND | 0.294 |
| 7. | Hemiterpenoid Aldehyde | 0.053 | 0.48 |
| 8. | Monoterpenoid Alcohol | 0.878 | 1.109 |
| 9. | Phenylpropanoid |
|
|
| 10. | Others |
|
|
| Total | 100 | 100 | |
Fig. 1GC-MS Spectrum of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil
Fig. 2GC-MS spectrum of water extract part of Anethum sowa L. root
Antioxidant activity of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil and standards
| Essential oil | Standard Antioxidants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Concentration (mg/mL) | Log Dose | Average percent of Inhibition ± SD | Dose Concentration (μg/mL) | Log Dose | Average percent of Inhibition ± SD of BHT | Average percent of Inhibition ± SD of ASA |
| 46.5 | 1.66 | 93.43 ± 0.24 | 200 | 2.301 | 93.02 ± 0.50 | 99.05 ± 0.21 |
| 23.25 | 1.36 | 89.56 ± 0.22 | 100 | 2 | 91.98 ± 0.19 | 98.35 ± 0.17 |
| 11.625 | 1.06 | 84.17 ± 0.25 | 50 | 1.698 | 85.51 ± 0.76 | 90.71 ± 0.60 |
| 5.8125 | 0.764 | 64.68 ± 0.21 | 25 | 1.397 | 69.54 ± 0.60 | 85.31 ± 0.60 |
| 2.90625 | 0.463 | 41.25 ± 0.12 | 12.5 | 1.096 | 55.87 ± 0.82 | 79.79 ± 0.18 |
| 1.453125 | 0.162 | 32.41 ± 0.31 | 6.25 | 0.795 | 29.69 ± 0.97 | 69.67 ± 0.68 |
| 0.72656 | −0.138 | 19.71 ± 0.40 | 3.125 | 0.494 | 25.63 ± 0.51 | 37.26 ± 1.12 |
| 0.36328 | −0.439 | 17.18 ± 0.05 | 1.5625 | 0.193 | 9.05 ± 0.51 | 27.02 ± 1.19 |
| Average IC50 value = 3.07 ± 0.01 mg/mL | IC50 value = 11.84 ± 0.29 μg/mL | IC50 value = 3.74 ± 0.05 μg/mL | ||||
ASA Ascorbic acid, BHT Tert-butyl-1-hydroxytoluene, Mean ± SD
Fig. 3Scavenging activity of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil and standard in different dosage
Effect of vincristine sulphate and essential oil of Anethum sowa L root on brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay
| Dose (μg/mL) | Log Dose (μg/mL) | % of mortality | Probit | LC50 (μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincristine sulphate | Root essential oil | Vincristine sulphate | Root essential oil | Vincristine sulphate | Root essential oil | ||
| 10 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 7.0959 | 6.723 | ||
| 5 | 0.699 | 90 | 80 | 6.2802 | 5.8408 | ||
| 2.5 | 0.3979 | 80 | 60 | 5.8413 | 5.241 | ||
| 1.25 | 0.0969 | 60 | 50 | 5.2402 |
| ||
| 0.625 | −0.2041 | 60 | 40 |
| 4.7482 |
|
|
| 0.3125 | −0.5051 | 40 | 30 | 4.7467 | 4.4782 | ||
| 0.156 | −0.8069 | 30 | 20 | 4.4774 | 4.1638 | ||
| 0.078 | −1.1079 | 20 | 20 | 4.1665 | 4.1753 | ||
| 0.039 | −1.4089 | 10 | 10 | 3.7206 | 3.7198 | ||
| 0.0195 | −1.71 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3.8288 | ||
Fig. 4Cytotoxic activity of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil and vincristine sulphate against different dosage
Anti-bacterial activity (Zone of Inhibition) of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil by diffusion method
| Test organisms | Zone of Inhibition in mm | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400 μg/well | 600 μg/well | 800 μg/well | CP | TE | ||
| Gram-positive bacteria |
| nz | 4 | 7 | 27 | 24 |
|
| 5 | 7 | 8 | 29 | 21 | |
|
| nz | 3 | 7 | 25 | 26 | |
|
| nz | nz | nz | 20 | 16 | |
| Gram -negative bacteria |
| nz | 4 | 7 | 25 | 9 |
|
| 11 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 11 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 11 | 29 | 16 | |
|
| nz | nz | 5 | 39 | 23 | |
|
| nz | 5 | 9 | 35 | 25 | |
|
| nz | nz | 3 | 28 | 23 | |
CP Standard Ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disc), TE Standard Tetracycline (30 μg/disc)
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil and standard ciprofloxacin
| Test organisms | Essential Oil | Std. CP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) | MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) | ||
| Gram-positive bacteria |
| 125 | 250 | 1.55 | 12.5 |
|
| 125 | 500 | 3.125 | 25 | |
|
| 125 | 250 | 6.25 | 50 | |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 0.37 | 100 | |
| Gram -negative bacteria |
| 250 | 500 | 0.75 | 50 |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 0.37 | 6.25 | |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 3.125 | 25 | |
|
| 62.5 | 250 | 0.37 | 6.25 | |
|
| 250 | 500 | 0.19 | 3.125 | |
|
| 62.5 | 500 | 0.37 | 50 | |
Std. CP Standard Ciprofloxacin
Fig. 5Zone of Bacillus cereus for standard, and essential oil at 800 μg/ well
Fig. 6Zone of P. aeruginosa for standard and essential oil at 800 μg/ well
Anti-fungal activity of Anethum sowa L. root essential oil
| Fungi | Zone of Inhibition in mm | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essential oil | Fluconazole | MIC/MBC (μg/mL) | ||||
| 400 μg/well | 600 μg/well | 800 μg/ well | 100 μg/well | Essential oil | Fluconazole | |
|
| - | 3 | 7 | 23 | 125/500 | 62.5/250 |
|
| - | 5 | 9 | 16 | 250/500 | 125/500 |
|
| - | 4 | 7 | 10 | 62.5/250 | 62.5/250 |
|
| - | - | - | 9 | 250/500 | 125/500 |