| Literature DB >> 28231700 |
A Taticchi1, S Bartocci2, M Servili1, S Di Giovanni2, M Pauselli1, E Mourvaki1, D Meo Zilio2, S Terramoccia2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Following a previous report, an experiment was conducted to determine the effect of increasing level of dried stoned olives pomaces (DSOP) in the diet of lactating buffaloes on milk and mozzarella cheese yield and characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy Water Buffalo; Dried Stoned Olive Pomace; Milk Production and Quality; Mozzarella Cheese Quality
Year: 2017 PMID: 28231700 PMCID: PMC5666196 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Buffaloes characteristics of the two groups (eight animals for each group)1)
| C | DSOP | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milk yield in the previous lactation (kg) | 2,046 | 2,131 | 333.06 |
| Lactation length in the previous lactation (d) | 303 | 291 | 42.54 |
| Days in milking (d) | 70 | 74 | 14.76 |
| Milk yield (kg/d) | 9.80 | 9.77 | 1.51 |
| Live weight (kg) | 665 | 721 | 62.66 |
| Body condition score (BCS) (1÷9) | 6.42 | 6.58 | 0.41 |
C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; RMSE, root mean square of error.
Values are expressed as mean (n = 8).
Effects of dietary treatment on milk yield and quality (number of replication = 4), live weight, body condition score (number of replication = 2) from each group1)
| C | DSOP | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMI (kg/d) | 17.00 | 17.00 | - |
| Milk yield (kg/d) | 8.42 | 8.53 | 1.54 |
| Fat (%) | 8.57 | 8.95 | 0.94 |
| Protein (%) | 4.78 | 4.65 | 0.44 |
| Lactose (%) | 4.88 | 4.57 | 0.29 |
| Urea (mg/100 mL) | 39.10 | 40.52 | 4.50 |
| LW (kg) | 673 | 729 | 62.83 |
| ADG (g/d) | 406 | 393 | 122.04 |
| BCS | 6.50 | 6.69 | 0.32 |
C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; RMSE, root mean square of error; DMI, daily dry matter intake; LW, live weight; ADG, average daily gain; BCS, body condition score (1 = poor to 9 = obese).
Values are expressed as mean (n = 8).
Effect of DSOP on pH and chemical composition of buffalo mozzarella cheese
| On fresh matter | On dry matter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| C | DSOP | RMSE | C | DSOP | RMSE | |
| pH | 5.28 | 5.58 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| Dry matter (%) | 43.09 | 43.49 | 0.76 | - | - | - |
| Fat (%) | 25.24 | 26.06 | 0.36 | 58.81 | 59.93 | 0.20 |
| Protein (%) | 14.18 | 14.04 | 0.37 | 32.90 | 32.29 | 0.82 |
| Ash (%) | 1.39 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 3.22 | 3.01 | 0.16 |
C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; RMSE, root mean square of error.
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups;
p<0.05.
Effects of dietary treatment on mozzarella cheese fatty acid composition (% FAME)
| C | DSOP | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C6:0 | 3.89 | 2.44 | 0.38 |
| C8:0 | 3.01 | 2.24 | 0.21 |
| C10:0 | 4.12 | 3.60 | 0.23 |
| C12:0 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| C14:0 | 18.66 | 16.92 | 1.00 |
| C16:0 | 39.00 | 36.07 | 2.00 |
| C18:0 | 6.82 | 8.05 | 0.92 |
| C18:1n9 | 14.06 | 20.90 | 1.57 |
| C18:2n6 | 1.52 | 1.69 | 0.32 |
| C18:3n3 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| C20:4n6 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| C20:5n3 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| C20:6n3 | 0.0009 | 0.0005 | 0.00 |
| SCFA | 11.00 | 8.39 | 0.59 |
| MCFA | 60.97 | 55.29 | 2.31 |
| LCFA | 27.92 | 36.31 | 2.31 |
| SFA | 77.69 | 71.63 | 1.79 |
| UFA | 22.31 | 28.37 | 1.79 |
| MUFA | 18.77 | 24.65 | 1.61 |
| PUFA | 3.53 | 3.71 | 0.75 |
| n6 | 3.33 | 2.76 | 0.30 |
| n3 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.10 |
| n6/n3 | 3.76 | 2.73 | 0.54 |
| Atherogenic index | 4.95 | 3.68 | 0.44 |
| Thrombogenic index | 3.68 | 3.14 | 0.30 |
FAME, fatty acid methyl ester; C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; RMSE, root mean square of error; SCFA, short chain fatty acids; MCFA, medium chain fatty acids; LCFA, long chain fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups;
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
Effects of diet and storage on mozzarella cheese tocopherol content and oxidative status also of governing liquid
| C | DSOP | TRT | t | TRTxt | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mozzarella cheese | ||||||
| α-tocopherol (g/100 g) | 159.39 | 148.25 | ns | ns | 23.31 | |
| γ-tocopherol (g/100 g) | 1.88 | 1.65 | ns | ns | 0.36 | |
| Total tocopherols (g/100 g) | 161.27 | 149.90 | ns | ns | 23.26 | |
| α-tocopherol (g/g fat) | 6.13 | 5.68 | ns | ns | 0.88 | |
| γ-tocopherol (g/g fat) | 0.07 | 0.06 | ns | ns | 0.01 | |
| Total tocopherols (g/g fat) | 6.20 | 5.75 | ns | ns | 0.88 | |
| TBARs (g MDA/g fat) | 2.69 | 2.57 | ns | ns | 0.60 | |
| Governing liquid | ||||||
| TBARs (g MDA/mL) | 0.38 | 0.26 | ns | ns | ns | 0.07 |
C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; TRT, effect of dietary treatment; t, effect of storage time; RMSE, root mean square of error; TBARs, reactive substances with tiobarbituric acid; MDA, malondialdehyde.
p<0.01.
Figure 1Effect of storage on α-tocopherol content in mozzarella cheese obtained with the milk from the two groups of buffaloes with different dietary treatments (C and DSOP). C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces. * p<0.01.
Figure 2Effect of storage on the oxidative status (TBARs) of mozzarella cheese obtained with the milk from the two groups of buffaloes with different dietary treatments (C and DSOP). TBARs, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces. * p<0.01.
Figure 3Effect of storage on the oxidative status (TBARs) of the governing liquid of mozzarella cheese obtained with the milk from the two groups of buffaloes with different dietary treatments (C and DSOP). TBARs, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces. * p<0.01.
Sensory evaluation (n = 7) of mozzarella cheese samples produced with bulk milk from the two groups (number of attributions per descriptor)
| C | DSOP | Sign. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface appearence | |||
| Colour | NS | ||
| White | 3 | 3 | |
| Pearly white | 4 | 4 | |
| Ivory white | - | - | |
| Rind | NS | ||
| Smooth | 4 | 5 | |
| Rough | 2 | 2 | |
| Toad skin | 1 | - | |
| Internal appearence | |||
| Colour | NS | ||
| White | 3 | 3 | |
| Pearly white | 4 | 4 | |
| Ivory white | - | - | |
| Body | NS | ||
| Compact | 4 | 6 | |
| Hollow | 3 | 1 | |
| Olfactory sensations | NS | ||
| Lactic | 5 | 5 | |
| Herbaceous | - | 1 | |
| Animal | 2 | 1 | |
| Tasty sensations | NS | ||
| Sweet | 6 | 5 | |
| Salty | - | 1 | |
| Acid | - | - | |
| Bitter | - | - | |
| Astringent | 1 | 1 | |
| Structure ( | - | ||
| Soft | 3 | 4 | |
| Hard | 1 | - | |
| Strident | 2 | 1 | |
| Elastic | 1 | 1 | |
| Rubbery | 1 | 1 | |
| Juicy | 3 | 4 | |
| Dry | - | - | |
C, control; DSOP, dried stoned olive pomaces; NS, not significant.
Fisher’s exact test was not used since each judge could give 2 ratings.