| Literature DB >> 25049875 |
S Terramoccia1, S Bartocci1, A Taticchi1, S Di Giovanni1, M Pauselli1, E Mourvaki1, S Urbani1, M Servili1.
Abstract
Dried stoned olive pomace (DSOP) was administered to dairy water buffaloes, and their productive performance and milk composition were analysed. Sixteen pluriparous lactating buffaloes were divided into two uniform groups (control and experimental), taking into consideration the following parameters: milk production (2,192 and 2,102 kg) and duration of lactation (254 and 252 d) of the previous year, distance from calving (51 and 43 d), milk production (9.71 and 10.18 kg/d), body condition score (BCS) (6.44 and 6.31) and weight (617 and 653 kg) at the beginning of the trial. Both diets had the same formulation: second cut alfalfa hay 20%, corn silage 42%, concentrate 38% but the two concentrates differed in their formulation, the experimental one contained 15.50% of DSOP as fed. The employed DSOP showed high amounts of secoiridoids, such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol (3,4-DHPEA) (1.2 g/kg DM), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol-elenolic acid di-aldehyde (3,4-DHPEA-EDA) (12.6 g/kg DM), p-hydroxyphenylethanol-elenolic acid di-aldehyde (p-HPEA-EDA) (5.6 g/kg DM) and lignans, which are known to be powerful bioactive compounds. The control diet had an energy-protein content of 0.86 Milk FU/kg DM and 143.3 g/kg DM of crude protein, whereas the experimental diet of 0.87 Milk FU/kg DM and 146.6 g/kg DM of crude protein. Each animal of the two groups received 17 kg DM/d and each buffalo of the experimental group, by way of the concentrate, ingested 1.05 kg DM/d of DSOP. The trial lasted 40 days. No significant difference was found between the BCS (6.41 and 6.53), live weight (625.93 and 662.50 kg) and milk production (9.69 and 10.08 kg/d) of the two groups, as was the case for fat, protein, lactose, pH and coagulating parameters of the two milks. The milk fat of the experimental group had a significantly higher content of total tocopherols (10.45 vs 8.60 μg/g, p<0.01) and retinol (3.17 vs 2.54 μg/g, p<0.01). The content of the reactive substances with tiobarbituric acid (TBARs) was significantly lower in the milk fat of the experimental group (12.09 vs 15.05 μg MDA/g, p<0.01). The acid content of the milk fat of the experimental group had a significantly higher content (p<0.05) of C18:0 and of C18:3ω6. LC-MS/MS analysis showed the presence of 3,4-DHPEA (36.0 μg/L) in the milk of the DSOP-fed buffaloes, while other phenols were not found. DSOP, in the quantity utilized, can be used in the feeding of the lactating buffalo; the dietetic-nutritional characteristics of the milk are improved due to a greater contribution of tocopherols, retinol and the presence of hydroxytyrosol.Entities:
Keywords: Buffalo; Dried Stoned Olive Pomace; Milk Production and Quality
Year: 2013 PMID: 25049875 PMCID: PMC4093495 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Formulation of the two concentrates (% as fed)
| Control | Experimental | |
|---|---|---|
| Bran flour | 27.00 | 20.00 |
| Maize flour | 21.00 | 25.00 |
| Soya extract flour | 12.00 | 15.00 |
| Flour from distillery residues | 10.00 | 5.00 |
| Flour of dehydrated alfalfa | 10.00 | - |
| Flour from sunflower extract | 9.00 | 12.00 |
| Flour from beet pulp | 3.50 | - |
| Flour from stoned olive pomace | - | 15.50 |
| Molasses | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Vitamin-mineral supplementation | 4.50 | 4.50 |
Dry matter (g/kg as fed), chemical composition (g/kg DM) and net energy (Milk FU/kg DM) of the feedstuffs and of the two diets utilized
| DM | CP | CF | EE | NSC | Ash | NDF | ADF | ADL | NE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfalfa hay | 879.6 | 179.9 | 339.2 | 27.1 | 207.2 | 85.3 | 500.5 | 385.1 | 87.6 | 0.67 |
| Maize silage | 334.2 | 83.9 | 216.7 | 24.8 | 327.9 | 46.9 | 516.5 | 259.0 | 44.9 | 0.83 |
| Control concentrate | 907.3 | 189.6 | 124.4 | 29.7 | 366.0 | 99.8 | 314.9 | 175.3 | 65.5 | 0.98 |
| Experimental concentrate | 912.5 | 198.3 | 124.7 | 47.5 | 348.2 | 84.8 | 321.2 | 168.6 | 78.2 | 1.01 |
| Control diet | 661.1 | 143.3 | 206.1 | 27.1 | 318.2 | 74.7 | 436.7 | 252.4 | 61.3 | 0.86 |
| Experimental diet | 663.1 | 146.6 | 206.2 | 33.9 | 311.4 | 69.0 | 439.1 | 249.9 | 66.1 | 0.87 |
DM = Dry matter; CP = Crude protein; CF = Crude fibre; EE = Ether extract; NSC = Non-structural carbohydrates;
NDF = Neutral-detergent fibre; ADF = Acid-detergent fibre; ADL = Acid-detergent lignin; NE = Net energy.
Dry matter (g/kg as feed), chemical composition (g/kg DM), net energy (Milk FU/kg DM), fatty acid profile (%) and phenolic compounds (g/kg DM) of dried stoned olive pomace (DSOP)
| Composition | |
|---|---|
| DM | 956.7 |
| CP | 100.9 |
| CF | 184.1 |
| EE | 206.6 |
| NSC | 195.3 |
| Ash | 75.6 |
| NDF | 421.6 |
| ADF | 329.2 |
| ADL | 207.8 |
| NE | 0.70 |
| Fatty acids profile | |
| C14:0 | 0.1 |
| C16:0 | 12.3 |
| C16:1 | 0.9 |
| C17:0 | 0.1 |
| C18:0 | 1.9 |
| C18:1n9 | 75.5 |
| C18:2n6 | 8.3 |
| C18:3n3 | 0.6 |
| C20:0 | 0.2 |
| C20:1n9 | 0.3 |
| Phenolic compounds | |
| 3,4-DHPEA | 1.2 |
| p-HPEA | 0.9 |
| Verbascoside | 10.0 |
| 3,4-DHPEA-EDA | 12.6 |
| p-HPEA-EDA | 5.6 |
| (+)-1-Acetoxypinoresinol | 0.2 |
DM = Dry matter; CP = Crude protein; CF = Crude fibre;
EE = Ether extract; NSC = Non-structural carbohydrates;
NDF = Neutral-detergent fibre; ADF = Acid-detergent fibre;
ADL = Acid-detergent lignin; NE = Net energy;
3,4-DHPEA = 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol;
p-HPEA = p-Hydroxyphenylethanol;
3,4-DHPEA-EDA = 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol-elenolic acid di-aldehyde;
p-HPEA-EDA = p-Hydroxyphenylethanol-elenolic acid di-aldehyde.
Tocopherols, tocotrienol (μg/g) and fatty acids (%) of the feedstuffs used
| Alfalfa hay | Maize silage | Control concentrate | Experimental concentrate | Rmse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-tocopherol | 2.36 | 43.32 | 45.64 | 50.26 | 1.33 |
| γ-tocopherol | 0.16 | 2.79 | 1.59 | 2.72 | 0.19 |
| δ-tocopherol | - | 1.10 | 1.43 | 1.73 | 0.14 |
| γ-tocotrienol | - | 7.94 | 7.21 | 8.18 | 0.47 |
| Toc. totals | 2.52 | 55.15 | 55.87 | 62.88 | 2.17 |
| Fatty acid profile | |||||
| C10:0 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| C12:0 | 1.04 | 0.39 | 1.34 | 0.56 | 0.03 |
| C14:0 | 1.76 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.02 |
| C16:0 | 29.01 | 17.20 | 17.13 | 15.01 | 0.40 |
| C18:0 | 4.83 | 2.02 | 3.00 | 2.86 | 0.07 |
| C18:1ω9 | 5.51 | 20.67 | 27.53 | 42.05 | 0.89 |
| C18:2ω6 | 16.85 | 45.92 | 42.18 | 32.76 | 0.94 |
| C18:3ω3 | 22.30 | 7.03 | 4.02 | 2.95 | 0.09 |
| C20:4ω6 | 1.03 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| C20:5ω3 | 1.40 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| C22:6ω3 | 1.37 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
p<0.01;
p<0.05;
p = 6.28%.
Live weight, body condition score, milk yield and quality
| Control | Experimental | Rmse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMI (kg/d) | 17.00 | 17.00 | - |
| LW (kg) | 625.93 | 662.50 | 90.16 |
| ADG (g/d) | 421.88 | 437.50 | 391.47 |
| BCS (1÷9) | 6.41 | 6.53 | 0.45 |
| Milk yield (kg/d) | 9.69 | 10.08 | 2.53 |
| Fat (%) | 7.16 | 7.36 | 1.07 |
| Protein (%) | 4.51 | 4.45 | 0.33 |
| Lactose (%) | 4.88 | 4.90 | 0.19 |
| Urea (mg/100 ml) | 32.58 | 33.13 | 3.22 |
DMI = Dry matter intake; LW = Live weight; ADG = Average daily gain; BCS = Body condition score.
Milk quality and estimated yield of “mozzarella cheese”
| Control | Experimental | Rmse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.78 | 6.80 | 0.08 |
| r (min) | 20.34 | 22.35 | 4.15 |
| K20 (min) | 2.30 | 2.66 | 1.28 |
| A30 (mm) | 44.40 | 35.25 | 14.22 |
| Estimated “mozzarella cheese” (kg/d) | 2.28 | 2.40 | 0.59 |
r = Rennet clotting time; K20 = Curd firming time; A30 = Curd firmness.
Tocopherols, tocotrienol, retinol and oxidative stability of the lipid fraction of the milk of the two groups
| Control | Experimental | Rmse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| α-tocopherol (μg/g fat) | 6.83 | 8.19 | 1.00 |
| γ-tocopherol (μg/g fat) | 1.37 | 1.70 | 0.21 |
| δ-tocopherol (μg/g fat) | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| γ-tocotrienol (μg/g fat) | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.05 |
| Toc. totals (μg/g fat) | 8.60 | 10.45 | 1.12 |
| Retinol (μg/g fat) | 2.54 | 3.17 | 0.28 |
| TBARs (μg MDA/g fat) | 15.05 | 12.09 | 1.79 |
p<0.01;
p<0.05.
TBARs = Reactive substances with tiobarbituric acid; MDA = Malondialdehyde.
Figure 1.HPLC-ESI-MS/MS chromatogram obtained from a milk sample produced by a DSOP-fed buffalo cow. [1] 3,4-DHPEA = 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol (hydroxytyrosol).
Acid composition (%) of the milk fat of the two groups
| Control | Experimental | Rmse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C6:0 | 5.20 | 4.72 | 1.00 |
| C8:0 | 3.17 | 2.74 | 0.79 |
| C10:0 | 4.08 | 3.72 | 1.01 |
| C12:0 | 4.31 | 3.95 | 0.56 |
| C14:0 | 14.43 | 14.30 | 1.02 |
| C16:0 | 34.10 | 33.53 | 2.91 |
| C18:0 | 7.34 | 8.60 | 0.93 |
| C18:1ω9 | 16.83 | 17.81 | 2.58 |
| C18:1ω7 | 0.96 | 1.27 | 0.33 |
| C18:2ω6 | 2.15 | 2.29 | 0.39 |
| C18:3ω3 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.08 |
| C18:3ω6 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| C18:4ω3 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.11 |
| C20:4ω6 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.08 |
| C20:5ω3 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| C22:6ω3 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| SFA | 74.52 | 73.30 | 2.97 |
| MUFA | 21.08 | 22.15 | 2.69 |
| PUFA | 4.40 | 4.55 | 0.74 |
| SFA/UFA | 3.04 | 2.75 | 0.41 |
| ω3 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 0.42 |
| ω6 | 3.47 | 3.64 | 0.46 |
| ω6/ω3 | 2.40 | 2.51 | 0.26 |
| Atherogenic index | 3.84 | 3.60 | 0.57 |
| Thrombogenic index | 3.87 | 3.75 | 0.51 |
| Short chain (C6:0-C10:0) | 12.35 | 10.93 | 2.53 |
| Medium chain (C11:0-C16:3ω4) | 57.56 | 56.17 | 3.11 |
| Long chain (C17:0-C24:1) | 30.09 | 32.90 | 3.69 |
p<0.05;
p = 8.67%.
SFA = Saturated fatty acids; MUFA = Monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = Polyunsaturated fatty acids; UFA = Unsaturated fatty acids.