Literature DB >> 28231477

Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper.

Ethan R Buch1, Emiliano Santarnecchi2, Andrea Antal3, Jan Born4, Pablo A Celnik5, Joseph Classen6, Christian Gerloff7, Mark Hallett8, Friedhelm C Hummel7, Michael A Nitsche9, Alvaro Pascual-Leone2, Walter J Paulus3, Janine Reis10, Edwin M Robertson11, John C Rothwell12, Marco Sandrini13, Heidi M Schambra14, Eric M Wassermann15, Ulf Ziemann16, Leonardo G Cohen17.   

Abstract

Motor skills are required for activities of daily living. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied in association with motor skill learning has been investigated as a tool for enhancing training effects in health and disease. Here, we review the published literature investigating whether tDCS can facilitate the acquisition, retention or adaptation of motor skills. Work in multiple laboratories is underway to develop a mechanistic understanding of tDCS effects on different forms of learning and to optimize stimulation protocols. Efforts are required to improve reproducibility and standardization. Overall, reproducibility remains to be fully tested, effect sizes with present techniques vary over a wide range, and the basis of observed inter-individual variability in tDCS effects is incompletely understood. It is recommended that future studies explicitly state in the Methods the exploratory (hypothesis-generating) or hypothesis-driven (confirmatory) nature of the experimental designs. General research practices could be improved with prospective pre-registration of hypothesis-based investigations, more emphasis on the detailed description of methods (including all pertinent details to enable future modeling of induced current and experimental replication), and use of post-publication open data repositories. A checklist is proposed for reporting tDCS investigations in a way that can improve efforts to assess reproducibility.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:  Effect-size; Guidelines; Learning; Memory; Motor; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Open Science; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28231477     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  86 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reductions in GABA following a tDCS-language intervention for primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Ashley D Harris; Zeyi Wang; Bronte Ficek; Kim Webster; Richard Ae Edden; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Induced sensorimotor cortex plasticity remediates chronic treatment-resistant visual neglect.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Patrice Revol; Helena Cousijn; Jamie Near; Pierre Petitet; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Anne-Kathrin Gellner; Janine Reis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex immediately after practice of a motor sequence does not improve offline gain.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Austin McCulloch; Hakjoo Kim; Taewon Kim; Joohyun Rhee; Willem B Verwey; John J Buchanan; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Kenneth Chelette; Jacek Dmochowski; Adam J Woods; Emily S Kappenman; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Explicit motor sequence learning after stroke: a neuropsychological study.

Authors:  Cristina Russo; Laura Veronelli; Carlotta Casati; Alessia Monti; Laura Perucca; Francesco Ferraro; Massimo Corbo; Giuseppe Vallar; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.