| Literature DB >> 28231170 |
Amit K Jaiswal1, Nissreen Abu-Ghannam2.
Abstract
Recent studies showed that Brassica vegetables are rich in numerous health-promoting compounds such as carotenoids, polyphenols, flavonoids, and glucosinolates (GLS), as well as isothiocyanates (ITCs) and are involved in health promotion upon consumption. ITCs are breakdown products of GLS, and typically used in the food industry as a food preservative and colouring agent. They are also used in the pharmaceutical industry due to their several pharmacological properties such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiprotozoal, anti-inflammatory, and chemoprotective effects, etc. Due to their widespread application in food and pharmaceuticals, the present study was designed to extract ITCs from York cabbage. In order to optimise the fermentation-assisted extraction process for maximum yield of ITCs from York cabbage, Box-Behnken design (BBD) combined with response surface methodology (RSM) was applied. Additionally, the GLS content of York cabbage was quantified and the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on GLS was evaluated. A range of GLS such as glucoraphanin, glucoiberin, glucobrassicin, sinigrin, gluconapin, neoglucobrassicin and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin were identified and quantified in fresh York cabbage. The experimental data obtained were fitted to a second-order polynomial equation using multiple regression analysis, and also examined by appropriate statistical methods. LAB facilitated the degradation of GLS, and the consequent formation of breakdown products such as ITCs. Results showed that the solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratio, fermentation time and agitation rate had a significant effect on the yield of ITCs (2.2 times increment). The optimum fermentation conditions to achieve a higher ITCs extraction yield were: S/L ratio of 0.25 w/v, fermentation time of 36 h, and agitation rate of 200 rpm. The obtained yields of ITCs (45.62 ± 2.13 μM sulforaphane equivalent (SFE)/mL) were comparable to the optimised conditions, indicating the accuracy of the model for the fermentation-assisted extraction of ITCs. This method has good prospects in industrial applications for the extraction of ITCs, and can be helpful in the food, pharmaceutical and agricultural sectors.Entities:
Keywords: Box-Behnken design; brassica vegetables; cabbage; fermentation; isothiocyanates; lactic acid bacteria
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231170 PMCID: PMC5302433 DOI: 10.3390/foods5040075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Level and code of independent variables used for Box-Behnken experimental design.
| Independent Variables | Coded Symbols | Coded Variable Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| –1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| S/L ratio ( |
| 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| Fermentation time (h) |
| 8 | 22 | 36 |
| Agitation rate (rpm) |
| 0 | 100 | 200 |
Glucosinolates (GLS) content in York cabbage.
| Individual GLS | GLS Content (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| Aliphatic GLS | |
| Sinigrin | 1.96 ± 0.025 |
| Gluconapin | 1.78 ± 0.075 |
| Glucoiberin | 3.08 ± 0.070 |
| Glucoraphanin | 3.92 ± 0.178 |
| Indol GLS | |
| Glucobrassicin | 2.42 ± 0.047 |
| Neoglucobrassicin | 0.63 ± 0.085 |
| 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin | 0.27 ± 0.038 |
Analysis of variance of the experimental results of the Box-Behnken design (BBD).
| Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: S/L ratio | 764.2 | 1 | 764.2 | 2496.9 | 0.0000 |
| B: Time | 24.2 | 1 | 24.2 | 79.0 | 0.0009 |
| C: Agitation | 15.6 | 1 | 15.6 | 50.9 | 0.0020 |
| AA | 41.9 | 1 | 41.9 | 137.0 | 0.0003 |
| AB | 42.4 | 1 | 42.4 | 138.5 | 0.0003 |
| AC | 0.34 | 1 | 0.34 | 1.12 | 0.3500 |
| BB | 26.3 | 1 | 26.3 | 86.1 | 0.0008 |
| BC | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.7051 |
| CC | 40.2 | 1 | 40.2 | 131.5 | 0.0003 |
| Lack-of-fit | 17.1 | 3 | 5.69 | 18.6 | 0.0082 |
| Pure error | 1.22 | 4 | 0.31 | ||
| Total (corr.) | 969.7 | 16 |
Box-Behnken experimental design for the three independent variables (S/L ratio, fermentation time and agitation rate), experimental and predicted values for isothiocyanates (ITCs) content.
| Row |
|
|
| Total ITCs Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | (h) | (rpm) | Exp | Predicted | |
| 1 | 0.25 | 36 | 100 | 36.8 | 38.1 |
| 2 | 0.25 | 22 | 200 | 39.7 | 40.4 |
| 3 | 0.15 | 8 | 200 | 28.9 | 29.2 |
| 4 | 0.15 | 22 | 100 | 28.7 | 29.0 |
| 5 | 0.15 | 8 | 0 | 24.6 | 26.6 |
| 6 | 0.05 | 22 | 200 | 19.2 | 20.3 |
| 7 | 0.25 | 22 | 0 | 38.1 | 37.0 |
| 8 | 0.15 | 22 | 100 | 28.3 | 29.0 |
| 9 | 0.15 | 22 | 100 | 29.2 | 29.0 |
| 10 | 0.05 | 8 | 100 | 16.4 | 15.1 |
| 11 | 0.15 | 22 | 100 | 29.1 | 29.0 |
| 12 | 0.15 | 36 | 0 | 30.1 | 29.8 |
| 13 | 0.25 | 8 | 100 | 29.1 | 28.1 |
| 14 | 0.05 | 36 | 100 | 11.1 | 12.1 |
| 15 | 0.15 | 36 | 200 | 34.9 | 32.8 |
| 16 | 0.05 | 22 | 0 | 18.8 | 18.1 |
| 17 | 0.15 | 22 | 100 | 29.8 | 29.0 |
(X) S/L ratio, (X) fermentation time, (X) agitation rate, ITCs: μM sulforaphane equivalent (SFE)/mL.
Figure 1Three-dimensional response surface plot showing the effect of S/L ratio and agitation rate (rpm) on ITCs yield (ITCs: μM SFE/mL) when the response surface is fixed at fermentation time 22 h.
Figure 2Three-dimensional response surface plot showing the effect of fermentation time (h) and agitation rate on ITCs yield (ITCs: μM SFE/mL) when the response surface is fixed at S/L ratio = 0.15.