| Literature DB >> 28230804 |
Nuria Rubio-López1,2, Agustín Llopis-González3,4, María Morales-Suárez-Varela5,6.
Abstract
Calcium is an important nutrient for child development. The main objective of this study was to assess calcium intake and its adequacy with dietary reference intake (DRI) in Spanish children. The ANIVA (Antropometría y Nutrición Infantil de Valencia) study is a descriptive cross-sectional study. During two academic years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015, 1176 schoolchildren aged 6-9 years were selected from 14 primary schools in Valencia (Spain). Three-day food records were used to assess dietary intake, completed by parents/guardian. Anthropometric data (weight and height) were evaluated in all subjects. Nutritional intake was compared to estimated average requirements (EARs) and adequate intake (AI) values to determine nutritional adequacy. A percentage of 25.77% had inadequate calcium intake, and a significantly higher prevalence was observed in girls (p = 0.006). Adequate calcium intake showed a positive association with the height z-score (p = 0.032). When assessing dietary patterns, schoolchildren with adequate calcium intakes had better nutritional adequacy in all nutrients, except cholesterol (p = 0.086) and fluorine (p = 0.503). These results suggest a public health problem that must be addressed through nutrition education programs to increase intake of calcium-rich food and to correct the associated dietary pattern.Entities:
Keywords: calcium; children; nutrients intake; nutritional intake
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28230804 PMCID: PMC5331601 DOI: 10.3390/nu9020170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Schoolchildren’s anthropometric characteristics according to calcium intake.
| Adequate Calcium Intake ( | Inadequate Calcium Intake ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M/ | SD/% | M/ | SD/% | |
| Gender * | |||||
| Boys | 437 | 50.1 | 124 | 40.9 | 0.006 |
| Girls | 436 | 49.9 | 179 | 59.1 | 0.006 |
| Age (years) | 7.38 | 1.06 | 7.44 | 1.11 | 0.401 |
| Weight (kg) | 30.42 | 7.51 | 30.32 | 7.68 | 0.843 |
| Height (m) | 1.31 | 0.09 | 1.29 | 0.09 | 0.001 |
| BMI * | |||||
| Underweight | 53 | 6.1 | 16 | 5.3 | 0.614 |
| Normoweight | 472 | 54.1 | 173 | 57.1 | 0.361 |
| Overweight | 181 | 20.7 | 59 | 19.5 | 0.639 |
| Obesity | 167 | 19.1 | 55 | 18.1 | 0.708 |
| Weight | 1.11 | 1.24 | 1.07 | 1.31 | 0.634 |
| Height | 0.90 | 1.34 | 0.71 | 1.29 | 0.032 |
| BMI | 0.88 | 2.24 | 0.90 | 1.33 | 0.883 |
M: Mean; n: number; SD: Standard Deviation; %: percentage; BMI: Body Mass Index. * Percentage was done in columns. Means were compared with the use of a ANOVA test, and proportions with the use of a chi-square test. p-value < 0.05: considered statistically significant.
Nutritional inadequacy according to calcium intake and gender.
| Nutrients | DRIs | Adequate Calcium Intake ( | Inadequate Calcium Intake ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | |||||
| Total energy | <EER | 49 (13.2) | 81 (21.5) | 0.003 | 54 (47.0) | 84 (51.5) | 0.452 | 0.001 |
| Carbohydrates | <EAR | 358 (96.8) | 365 (97.1) | 0.802 | 102 (88.7) | 159 (97.5) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Protein a | >EAR | 268 (72.4) | 282 (75.0) | 0.426 | 84 (73.0) | 99 (60.7) | 0.033 | 0.008 |
| Calcium/protein ratio | <EAR | 369 (99.7) | 115 (100) | - | 115 (100) | 163 (100) | - | - |
| Fats a | >EAR | 328 (88.6) | 331(88.0) | 0.793 | 91 (79.1) | 145 (89.0) | 0.024 | 0.043 |
| Cholesterol a,b | >EAR | 75 (20.3) | 77 (20.5) | 0.944 | 12 (10.4) | 34 (20.9) | 0.021 | 0.086 |
| Fiber | <AI | 342 (92.4) | 360 (95.7) | 0.055 | 112 (97.4) | 160 (98.2) | 0.987 | 0.014 |
| Thiamin | <EAR | 6 (1.6) | 12 (3.2) | 0.162 | 12 (10.4) | 11 (6.7) | 0.272 | 0.001 |
| Riboflavin | <EAR | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.5) | - | 24 (20.9) | 35 (21.5) | 0.904 | - |
| Niacin | <EAR | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | - | - |
| Pantothenic acid | <AI | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | - | 1 (0.9) | 3 (1.8) | 0.874 | - |
| Vitamin B6 | <EAR | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.5) | 0.989 | 8 (7.0) | 6 (3.7) | 0.219 | 0.001 |
| Biotin | <EAR | 1 (0.4) | 2 (0.7) | 0.628 | 5 (6.8) | 6 (5.4) | 0.622 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin B12 | <EAR | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | - | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.6) | - | - |
| Folic acid | <EAR | 100 (27.0) | 103 (27.4) | 0.910 | 52 (45.2) | 84 (51.5) | 0.299 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin C | <EAR | 23 (6.2) | 28 (7.4) | 0.505 | 14 (12.2) | 22 (13.5) | 0.746 | 0.017 |
| Vitamin A | <EAR | 10 (4.1) | 19 (7.1) | 0.064 | 10 (13.7) | 28 (25.0) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin D | <EAR | 298 (80.5) | 287 (76.3) | 0.162 | 103 (89.6) | 151 (92.6) | 0.369 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin E | <EAR | 132 (35.7) | 148 (39.4) | 0.299 | 64 (55.7) | 84 (51.5) | 0.498 | 0.001 |
| Phosphorus | <EAR | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.5) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | - |
| Calcium/phosphorus ratio | <EAR | 368 (99.5) | 373 (99.2) | 0.986 | 115 (100) | 163 (100) | - | - |
| Magnesium | <AI | 1 (0.3) | 3 (0.8) | 0.627 | 13 (11.3) | 14 (8.6) | 0.451 | 0.001 |
| Iron | <EAR | 21 (5.7) | 34 (9.0) | 0.078 | 27 (23.5) | 43 (26.4) | 0.583 | 0.001 |
| Zinc | <EAR | 7 (1.9) | 17 (4.5) | 0.042 | 24 (20.9) | 45 (27.6) | 0.200 | 0.001 |
| Iodine | <EAR | 253 (68.4) | 276 (73.4) | 0.131 | 111 (96.5) | 156 (95.7) | 0.975 | 0.001 |
| Selenium | <EAR | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | - |
| Fluoride | <AI | 356 (96.2) | 363 (96.5) | 0.811 | 111 (96.5) | 153 (93.9) | 0.878 | 0.503 |
n: number; TEV: Total Energy Value; EAR: estimated average requirement; AI: adequate intake. DRIs: EAR: carbohydrates (50%–60% TEV), protein (10%–15% TEV), calcium/protein ratio (20 mg/g), fats (30%–35% TEV), thiamin (0.8 mg/day), riboflavin (1.2 mg/day), niacin (12 mg/day), vitamin B6 (1.4 mg/day), biotin (12 µg/day), vitamin B12 (1.5 µg/day), folic acid (200 µg/day), vitamin C (55 mg/day), vitamin A (400 µg/day), vitamin D (5 µg/day), vitamin E (8 mg/day), calcium (800 mg/day), phosphorus (700 mg/day), calcium/phosphorus ratio (1 mg/mg), iron (9 mg/day), zinc (10 mg/day), iodine (90 µg/day), selenium (30 µg/day); AI: fiber (25 mg/day), pantothenic acid (3 mg/day), magnesium (180 mg/day), fluoride (1000 µg/day). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (Student’s t-test). It was considered inadequate when carbohydrate intake <50% TEV, protein >15% TEV, and fats >35% TEV. a Intakes failed to meet recommendations if they were under DRIs, except for protein, fats, and cholesterol, for which inadequate intakes were those over DRIs or nutritional targets for Spanish people, respectively. b The DRI for cholesterol was not determinable. Instead the Spanish population target of 100 mg/1000 kcal was considered. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.