| Literature DB >> 28230095 |
João Perdigão1, Sofia Clemente2, Jorge Ramos3, Pedro Masakidi2, Diana Machado3, Carla Silva1, Isabel Couto3, Miguel Viveiros3, Nuno Taveira1,4, Isabel Portugal1.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) poses a serious public health problem in Angola. No surveillance data on drug resistance is available and nothing is known regarding the genetic diversity and population structure of circulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Here, we have genotyped and evaluated drug susceptibility of 89 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Luanda. Thirty-three different spoligotype profiles corresponding to 24 different Shared International Types (SIT) and 9 orphan profiles were detected. SIT 20 (LAM1) was the most prevalent (n = 16, 18.2%) followed by SIT 42 (LAM9; n = 15, 17.1%). Overall, the M. tuberculosis population structure in this sample was dominated by LAM (64.8%) and T (33.0%) strains. Twenty-four-loci MIRU-VNTR analysis revealed that a total of 13 isolates were grouped in 5 distinct clusters. Drug susceptibility data showed that 22 (24.7%) of the 89 clinical isolates were resistant to one or more antibacillary drugs of which 4 (4.5%) were multidrug resistant. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a high predominance of LAM strains circulating in the Luanda setting and the presence of recent transmission events. The rate and the emergence dynamics of drug resistant TB found in this sample are significant and highlight the need of further studies specifically focused on MDR-TB transmission.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28230095 PMCID: PMC5322374 DOI: 10.1038/srep42814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart illustrating the selection of the studied sample of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and, main results from drug susceptibility testing and genotyping.
From the 106 sputum samples positive for acid-fast bacilli, 7 were excluded since they were duplicates from the same patient, 5 were contaminated and another 5 showed no growth, leaving a total of 89 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. Drug susceptibility testing revealed that 22 isolates were resistant to one or more antibacillary drugs, of which four corresponded to MDR-TB isolates. Genotyping analysis allowed the identification of 13 clustered isolates across five different MIRU-VNTR clusters with one isolate excluded due to mixed strain infection. Spoligotyping analysis revealed a population structure dominated mostly by LAM and T strains.
First-line drug resistance profiles found among the 89 studied isolates.
| Resistance Profile1 | No. of Isolates (%) |
|---|---|
| I | 6 (6.74) |
| IEP | 2 (2.25) |
| IREP | 1 (1.12) |
| IRS | 2 (2.25) |
| IRSEP | 1 (1.12) |
| IS | 4 (4.49) |
| R | 1 (1.12) |
| S | 5 (5.62) |
| Susceptible | 67 (75.28) |
| Total | 89 (100.00) |
1Resistance profile: I, isoniazid; R, rifampicin; S, streptomycin; E, ethambutol; P, pyrazinamide.
Number of isolates found in the present study by SIT and clade.
| Spoligotyping | No. Isolates (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SIT | Clade | Octal Code | |
| 635 | LAM3 | 000000007560771 | 2 (2.27) |
| Orphan | LAM1/LAM9 | 601777607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| Orphan | LAM1/LAM9 | 676777607760731 | 1 (1.14) |
| 2271 | LAM2 | 677717607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 194 | LAM2 | 677737607760731 | 1 (1.14) |
| 1755 | LAM6 | 677777607560771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 1321 | LAM1/LAM4 | 677777607760731 | 1 (1.14) |
| 20 | LAM1 | 677777607760771 | 16 (18.18) |
| Orphan | T3/X3 | 700003607560371 | 1 (1.14) |
| 1894 | LAM9 | 747777607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 144 | T1 | 770000003760771 | 5 (5.68) |
| 2073 | LAM3 | 776000607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 33 | LAM3 | 776177607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 1535 | LAM9 | 777577607760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 1548 | LAM8 | 777703400000360 | 2 (2.27) |
| Orphan | T1 | 777737737760731 | 1 (1.14) |
| Orphan | LAM9 | 777777405720771 | 1 (1.14) |
| Orphan | T1 | 777777557560771 | 1 (1.14) |
| Orphan | T1 | 777777577740371 | 1 (1.14) |
| 74 | T1 | 777777600160771 | 1 (1.14) |
| Orphan | LAM9 | 777777601460771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 306 | T1 | 777777601560771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 290 | LAM8 | 777777606760771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 95 | LAM6 | 777777607560731 | 1 (1.14) |
| 64 | LAM6 | 777777607560771 | 3 (3.41) |
| 1530 | LAM4 | 777777607760711 | 1 (1.14) |
| 60 | LAM4 | 777777607760731 | 3 (3.41) |
| 42 | LAM9 | 777777607760771 | 15 (17.05) |
| Orphan | LAM10 | 777777740160771 | 1 (1.14) |
| 2025 | Haarlem3/T1 | 777777777700371 | 1 (1.14) |
| 244 | T1 | 777777777760601 | 6 (6.82) |
| 52 | T2 | 777777777760731 | 1 (1.14) |
| 53 | T1 | 777777777760771 | 12 (13.64) |
| Total | 88 (100) | ||
Figure 2MIRU-VNTR dendrogram (24 loci) of the 88 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates analysed in the present study.
Drug resistance: I – isoniazid; R – rifampicin; S – streptomycin; E – ethambutol; and, P – pyrazinamide.
Comparison of various diversity estimators across different MIRU-VNTR loci sets and spoligotyping.
| Estimator1 | MIRU-VNTR Set | Spoligotyping | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12- | 15- | 24- | ||
| 0.973 | 0.993 | 0.996 | 0.915 | |
| No. of clusters | 17 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| No. of clustered isolates | 53 | 15 | 13 | 64 |
1D – Hunter-Gaston Index of diversity.
Figure 3Minimum spanning tree of the 88 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates studied herein.
The tree was constructed based on 24-loci MIRU-VNTR genotypic data and clonal complexes defined as MIRU-VNTR profiles within double-locus variants of each other. Clonal complexes have been highlighted and annotated on the tree (CC1-12) along with each node SIT, whenever each node is composed by strains of the same SIT and the spoligotype profile is not orphan. Numbers on the lines connecting each node indicate the loci difference between each node.
Clinical isolates present in each clonal complex defined as groups of 24-loci MIRU-VNTR profiles within double-locus variants of each other.
| Clonal Complex | Isolates | No. of Isolates (%) | Clade (No. of Isolates) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC1 | HDP7609, HDP7626, HDP7732, HDP8633, HDP9020, HDP7609, HDP8819, HDP7689, HDP7816, HDP7955, HDP8014, HDP8644, HDP7735, HDP8628, HDP7603, HDP7984, HDP7900, HDP7731 | 17 (19.3) | LAM1 (16), LAM6 (1) |
| CC2 | HDP9025, HDP7630, HDP7942, HDP7844, HDP7768, HDP7870 | 6 (6.8) | LAM9 (5), LAM8 (1) |
| CC3 | HDP8643, HDP7766, HDP7687, HDP7718, HDP8053, HDP7893 | 6 (6.8) | T1 (5), LAM10 (1) |
| CC4 | HDP8044, HDP7909, HDP8039, HDP8784, HDP7702 | 5 (5.6) | T1 (5) |
| CC5 | HDP7980, HDP8788, HDP7503, HDP8627 | 4 (4.5) | T1 (4) |
| CC6 | HDP7753, HDP8033, HDP7737 | 3 (3.4) | LAM9 (2), LAM6 (1) |
| CC7 | HDP7707, HDP7680, HDP8859 | 3 (3.4) | LAM1 (1), LAM2 (1), LAM9 (1) |
| CC8 | HDP8796, HDP7711 | 2 (2.3) | T1 (1), Haarlem3/T1 (1) |
| CC9 | HDP8045, HDP8015 | 2 (2.3) | T1 (2) |
| CC10 | HDP8719, HDP7874 | 2 (2.3) | T3/X3 (1), LAM6 (1) |
| CC11 | HDP8814, HDP8764 | 2 (2.3) | LAM3 (2) |
| CC12 | HDP7803, HDP7937 | 2 (2.3) | LAM9 (2) |
Distribution of genotypic groups, MIRU-VNTR Clonal Complexes and SIT, through the Kilamba-Kiaxi and Viana municipalities.
| Genotypic Group | No. of Isolates (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Kilamba-Kiaxi | Viana | |
| Clonal Complex1 | ||
| CC1 (LAM1) | 9 (26.47) | 3 (15.79) |
| CC2 (LAM9) | 2 (5.88) | 2 (10.53) |
| CC3 (T1) | 5 (14.71) | 1 (5.26) |
| CC4 (T1) | 1 (2.94) | 2 (10.53) |
| CC5 (T1) | 1 (2.94) | 1 (5.26) |
| CC6 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| CC7 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| CC8 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| C9 (T1) | 0 (0) | 2 (10.53) |
| CC10 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| CC11 (LAM3) | 12 (35.29) | 8 (42.11) |
| Total | 34 (100) | 19 (100) |
| Clade | ||
| HAARLEM3/T1 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| LAM1 | 9 (26.47) | 2 (10.53) |
| LAM1/LAM9 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| LAM10 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| LAM3 | 2 (5.88) | 0 (0) |
| LAM4 | 2 (5.88) | 1 (5.26) |
| LAM6 | 2 (5.88) | 1 (5.26) |
| LAM8 | 2 (5.88) | 0 (0) |
| LAM9 | 5 (14.71) | 4 (21.05) |
| T1 | 9 (26.47) | 9 (47.37) |
| T2 | 0 (0) | 1 (5.26) |
| T3/X3 | 0 (0) | 1 (5.26) |
| Total | 34 (100) | 19 (100) |
| SIT | ||
| 144 | 1 (2.94) | 2 (10.53) |
| 1530 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 1548 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| 1894 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 20 | 9 (26.47) | 2 (10.53) |
| 2025 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| 244 | 2 (5.88) | 2 (10.53) |
| 290 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| 306 | 0 (0) | 1 (5.26) |
| 33 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| 42 | 4 (11.76) | 4 (21.05) |
| 52 | 0 (0) | 1 (5.26) |
| 53 | 4 (11.76) | 3 (15.79) |
| 60 | 2 (5.88) | 1 (5.26) |
| 635 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| 64 | 1 (2.94) | 1 (5.26) |
| 95 | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) |
| Orphan | 5 (14.71) | 2 (10.53) |
| Total | 34 (100) | 19 (100) |
1Spoligotyping clade in brackets was added to clonal complexes whenever these were composed by a clear majority of a specific clade.