Suzanne J Wilson1, Gabrielle Davie2, Sarah Derrett1. 1. Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. 2. Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. gabrielle.davie@otago.ac.nz.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine, in a cohort with injuries classified anatomically as mainly minor or moderate and for which only 25% were hospitalised acutely, the prevalence of ongoing problems attributed by participants to their injury 2 years prior, and to examine whether three-month post-injury experiences and expectations predict such problems. METHODS: Participants (N = 2231; 18-64 years at injury) were those in the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study who completed the initial three-month and final two-year interviews. The outcome measure was whether participants reported ongoing injury-related problems at 2 years. Possible early post-injury predictors were identified from the first interview; pre-injury and injury-related potential confounders from the first interview, insurer records and hospital discharge records. Multivariable models estimated relative risks. RESULTS: Almost half the participants reported injury-related problems at 2 years. Participants reporting non-recovery at 3 months were more likely than those reporting recovery to have ongoing problems at 2 years, ranging from participants expecting to get better soon [adjusted RR 2.2, 95% CI (1.7,2.8)) to those expecting to never get better (aRR 3.1, 95% CI (2.4,4.0)]. Several three-month post-injury experiences also predicted ongoing problems at 2 years. Participants at highest risk included those with extreme pain [aRR 2.1, 95% CI (1.7,2.5)], and less involvement in usual activities [aRR 1.7, 95% CI (1.5,1.9)]. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that early post-injury characteristics predict longer-term recovery among this cohort, most of who were not classified as seriously injured, and provide guidance for future studies on interventions to reduce poor outcome prevalence, particularly focussing on pain management and enabling return to independence and social participation.
PURPOSE: To determine, in a cohort with injuries classified anatomically as mainly minor or moderate and for which only 25% were hospitalised acutely, the prevalence of ongoing problems attributed by participants to their injury 2 years prior, and to examine whether three-month post-injury experiences and expectations predict such problems. METHODS:Participants (N = 2231; 18-64 years at injury) were those in the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study who completed the initial three-month and final two-year interviews. The outcome measure was whether participants reported ongoing injury-related problems at 2 years. Possible early post-injury predictors were identified from the first interview; pre-injury and injury-related potential confounders from the first interview, insurer records and hospital discharge records. Multivariable models estimated relative risks. RESULTS: Almost half the participants reported injury-related problems at 2 years. Participants reporting non-recovery at 3 months were more likely than those reporting recovery to have ongoing problems at 2 years, ranging from participants expecting to get better soon [adjusted RR 2.2, 95% CI (1.7,2.8)) to those expecting to never get better (aRR 3.1, 95% CI (2.4,4.0)]. Several three-month post-injury experiences also predicted ongoing problems at 2 years. Participants at highest risk included those with extreme pain [aRR 2.1, 95% CI (1.7,2.5)], and less involvement in usual activities [aRR 1.7, 95% CI (1.5,1.9)]. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that early post-injury characteristics predict longer-term recovery among this cohort, most of who were not classified as seriously injured, and provide guidance for future studies on interventions to reduce poor outcome prevalence, particularly focussing on pain management and enabling return to independence and social participation.
Authors: Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A Haagsma; Eefje Belt; Ronan A Lyons; Vicki Erasmus; Johan Lund; Ed F van Beeck Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ronan A Lyons; Denise Kendrick; Elizabeth M Towner; Nicola Christie; Steven Macey; Carol Coupland; Belinda J Gabbe Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jane E Ferrie; Martin J Shipley; Stephen A Stansfeld; George Davey Smith; Michael Marmot Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Daniel S J Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Claudia Rutherford; Margaret-Ann Tait; Madeleine T King Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Suzanne J Wilson; Gabrielle Davie; Helen Harcombe; Emma H Wyeth; Ian D Cameron; Sarah Derrett Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nena Kruithof; Suzanne Polinder; Leonie de Munter; Cornelis L P van de Ree; Koen W W Lansink; Mariska A C de Jongh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roos Johanna Maria Havermans; Mariska Adriana Cornelia de Jongh; Leonie de Munter; Koen Willem Wouter Lansink Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sarah Derrett; Emma H Wyeth; Amy Richardson; Gabrielle Davie; Ari Samaranayaka; Rebbecca Lilley; Helen Harcombe Journal: Methods Protoc Date: 2021-05-17