Anke Spura1, Matthias Kleinke2, Bernt-Peter Robra2, Nadine Ladebeck3. 1. Institut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitsökonomie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. Anke.Spura@med.ovgu.de. 2. Institut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitsökonomie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. 3. Fachbereich Soziale Arbeit, Gesundheit und Medien, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Germany basic medical care for asylum seekers is organized outside the statutory health insurance system. Currently there are few empirically based statements on how asylum seekers experience their access to healthcare. The aim is therefore to evaluate their experiences with healthcare focussing on subjective health, utilisation and access to medical care, and experiences with medical care. METHODS: Between August and November 2015, we performed 16 qualitative problem-oriented guided interviews with asylum seekers, who received or sought medical care in Saxony-Anhalt. The interpreter-assisted interviews were evaluated with content analysis. RESULTS: Access begins with a voucher for medical treatment issued by the social security office. Asylum seekers experience that procedure as onerous and incapacitating. These experiences influence subjective health and utilisation of medical help. If their efforts for treatment certificates are rejected, people increasingly resign. If medical treatment is achieved, they experience medical staff mostly as competent and friendly, in spite of language difficulties and time pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the "voucher bureaucracy" by uniform rules and practices may bring about a relief to access and utilisation of healthcare. Introducing an electronic health insurance card for asylum seekers would retransfer decision making about treatment needs from the welfare system into the medical system.
BACKGROUND: In Germany basic medical care for asylum seekers is organized outside the statutory health insurance system. Currently there are few empirically based statements on how asylum seekers experience their access to healthcare. The aim is therefore to evaluate their experiences with healthcare focussing on subjective health, utilisation and access to medical care, and experiences with medical care. METHODS: Between August and November 2015, we performed 16 qualitative problem-oriented guided interviews with asylum seekers, who received or sought medical care in Saxony-Anhalt. The interpreter-assisted interviews were evaluated with content analysis. RESULTS: Access begins with a voucher for medical treatment issued by the social security office. Asylum seekers experience that procedure as onerous and incapacitating. These experiences influence subjective health and utilisation of medical help. If their efforts for treatment certificates are rejected, people increasingly resign. If medical treatment is achieved, they experience medical staff mostly as competent and friendly, in spite of language difficulties and time pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the "voucher bureaucracy" by uniform rules and practices may bring about a relief to access and utilisation of healthcare. Introducing an electronic health insurance card for asylum seekers would retransfer decision making about treatment needs from the welfare system into the medical system.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asylum seekers; Healthcare research; Medical services accessibility; Medical services utilisation; Voucher for medical treatment
Authors: Maren Hintermeier; Andreas W Gold; Stella Erdmann; Clara Perplies; Kayvan Bozorgmehr; Louise Biddle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Anna Freiberg; Andreas Wienke; Lena Bauer; Andreas Niedermaier; Amand Führer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christine Happle; Christian Dopfer; Diana Ernst; Evelyn Kleinert; Annabelle Vakilzadeh; Susanne Hellms; Iro Evlampidou; Nele Hillermann; Reinhold E Schmidt; Georg Mn Behrens; Frank Müller; Martin Wetzke; Alexandra Jablonka Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andreas Niedermaier; Anna Freiberg; Daniel Tiller; Andreas Wienke; Amand Führer Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.655