Literature DB >> 28226399

Wavelet-based scaling indices for breast cancer diagnostics.

T Roberts1, M Newell2, W Auffermann2, B Vidakovic1.   

Abstract

Mammography is routinely used to screen for breast cancer. However, the radiological interpretation of mammogram images is complicated by the heterogeneous nature of normal breast tissue and the fact that cancers are often of the same radiographic density as normal tissue. In this work, we use wavelets to quantify spectral slopes of breast cancer cases and controls and demonstrate their value in classifying images. In addition, we propose asymmetry statistics to be used in forming features, which improve the classification result. For the best classification procedure, we achieve approximately 77% accuracy (sensitivity=73%, specificity=84%) in classifying mammograms with and without cancer.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; mammography; scaling; wavelets

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28226399      PMCID: PMC5521192          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Image denoising with 2D scale-mixing complex wavelet transforms.

Authors:  Norbert Remenyi; Orietta Nicolis; Guy Nason; Brani Vidakovic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Self-similar anisotropic texture analysis: the hyperbolic wavelet transform contribution.

Authors:  Stéphane G Roux; Marianne Clausel; Béatrice Vedel; Stéphane Jaffard; Patrice Abry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Classification with correlated features: unreliability of feature ranking and solutions.

Authors:  Laura Tolosi; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi; S Galhotra; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; P M Jokich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Tumor heterogeneity estimation for radiomics in cancer.

Authors:  Ani Eloyan; Mun Sang Yue; Davit Khachatryan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Computational Methods for Structure-to-Function Analysis of Diet-Derived Catechins-Mediated Targeting of In Vitro Vasculogenic Mimicry.

Authors:  Abicumaran Uthamacumaran; Narjara Gonzalez Suarez; Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo; Borhane Annabi
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-04-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.