Lívia Montelo Araújo Jorge1, Omar Lupi1, Adriana Rego Hozannah1, Fred Bernardes Filho2. 1. Dermatology Service of Policlínica Geral do Rio de Janeiro (PGRJ) - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. 2. Division of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.
Dear Editor,Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystem infectious disease with prominent cutaneous findings.
It is caused by spirochetes belonging to the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex,
mainly transmitted by the bite of infected Ixodes ticks.[1,2] In Europe, it is
endemic in Germany, Austria, Denmark, and Sweden; in the Americas, it is considered a
public health problem in the United States.[1] As a notifiable disease, cases of borreliosis have been reported in
Brazil in the states of Amazonas, Tocantins, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso do Sul,
Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo.[2]The purpose of this article is to describe the occurrence of LD in a Brazilian tourist
who returned from Germany, and to alert the importance of early detection of the
disease.A 40-year old female patient, resident in Rio de Janeiro, sought our dermatology service
after noticing an erythematous patch with centrifugal growth and three weeks of
evolution on the left thigh. She denied previous treatment or comorbidities and had no
systemic symptoms. Two months before the onset of the lesion, the patient had returned
from a trip to Germany, where she was camping in a rural area and suffered a tick bite
on the left thigh. She reported having noticed the tick attached to her thigh in the
morning, but was unable to tell the length the tick had been feeding. She removed the
tick by pinching it with her fingernails. Dermatological examination revealed an
erythematous, infiltrated lesion on the inner side of the left thigh, with edge and
center presenting a more intense red color (Figure
1). We suggested the hypothesis of LD, given the patient's recent history of
travel to a borreliosis-endemic country, which was confirmed with positive serology for
B. burgdorferi (IgM). VDRL, FTA-Abs, and FAN research were negative. Histopathological
examination after lesion biopsy revealed perivascular inflammatory infiltrate,
predominantly lymphocytic, with plasma cells in the superficial and middle dermis (Figure 2). Warthin-Starry staining was negative. The
patient was treated with tetracycline (250 mg) orally every six hours for 14 days with
thigh lesion regression (Figure 3).
Figure 1
Bull’s eye erythematous infiltrated legion on the inner side of the left
thigh
Figure 2
Perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, predominantly lymphocytic with plasma
cells in the superficial and middle dermis (A: Hematoxylin
& eosin x40; B: Hematoxylin & eosin x400)
Figure 3
Regression of the lesion after the end of treatment
Bull’s eye erythematous infiltrated legion on the inner side of the left
thighPerivascular inflammatory infiltrate, predominantly lymphocytic with plasma
cells in the superficial and middle dermis (A: Hematoxylin
& eosin x40; B: Hematoxylin & eosin x400)Regression of the lesion after the end of treatmentLD's clinical picture can be divided into three stages: the first stage is characterized
by predominantly cutaneous lesions, and its main manifestation is the migratory
erythema, reported in 60%-83% of cases; the second stage can occur with articular,
neurological, cardiac, and ophthalmologic manifestations; the third stage features
chronic rheumatologic, neurological, ophthalmological, and cutaneous pictures.[1,2]Diagnosis is based on epidemiological, clinical, and laboratorial aspects.[1,2]
Histological findings by hematoxylin-eosin staining of the present case are suggestive
for borreliosis. Failure to demonstrate the presence of B. burgdorferi using silver
staining is justified by the low sensitivity of this technique, which varies from
10%-40%.[2] In Brazil, due to the
impossibility to identify the etiologic agent of LD - because of the difference between
etiologic agent and vectors, and the lack of standardization of laboratory methods -
cases began to be called borreliosis-simile or Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome, caused by
spirochetes of the B. burgdorferi sensu lato complex. They have atypical morphology, are
uncultivable and transmitted by ticks of the genus Amblyomma and
Rhipicephalus.[2]However, Santos et al.[3]
provided clinical and serological evidences that LD is indeed found in Brazil and that
there is infection by Borrelia sp. in the Brazilian Amazon. In their study, 7% of the
270 serum samples evaluated contained specific antibody to C6 antigen of B. burgdorferi;
6 (46.2%) out of 19 ELISA-positive patients showed positive Western blot reactions for
Borrelia antigen.[3] This observed
frequency coincided with the data of a study Cotia (7.5%) and high risk areas in North
America.[3,4] Talhari et al.[4] demonstrated - with the association of
specific immunohistochemical techniques and focus floating microscopy - the presence of
B. burgdorferi in 22.7% of patients with clinical and histopathological evidences
suggestive of multiple sclerosis in the metropolitan region of Manaus, strengthening the
evidence that LD is found in the Brazilian Amazon region.[4]With the increase in international travel in the past decades, a greater variety of
infectious diseases has been observed. Many infections previously considered uncommon in
travelers have been described and may confuse professionals who are not familiar with
the new clinical and epidemiological pictures.[5] It is key to advise those who travel to borreliosis-endemic
areas to avoid insect bites, especially ticks, by using long sleeve clothes and
repellents.We emphasize that early diagnosis of borreliosis is imperative, for the delay in its
detection may result in serious health problems - such as atrioventricular block,
ventricular repolarization disorders, encephalitis, myelitis, among others - with
non-reversible consequences despite treatment.