Literature DB >> 28225902

Diagnosis of human herpes virus 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2): use of a synthetic standard curve for absolute quantification by real time polymerase chain reaction.

Lyana Rodrigues Pinto Lima1, Amanda Perse da Silva1, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit2, Vanessa Salete de Paula1.   

Abstract

The use of quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for herpesvirus detection has improved the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis, as it is able to detect shedding episodes in the absence of clinical lesions and diagnose clinical specimens that have low viral loads. With an aim to improve the detection and quantification of herpesvirus by qPCR, synthetic standard curves for human herpesvirus 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2) targeting regions gD and gG, respectively, were designed and evaluated. The results show that synthetic curves can replace DNA standard curves in diagnostic herpes qPCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28225902      PMCID: PMC5319368          DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz        ISSN: 0074-0276            Impact factor:   2.743


The human herpesvirus or herpes simplex virus (HHV or HSV) is a neurotropic virus that has two distinct serotypes, human herpesvirus 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2). Although both viruses are closely related, they contain sufficient differences to enable type identification (Nicoll et al. 2012). Historically, HHV-1 was considered the main cause of orolabial lesions, and HHV-2 was most commonly associated with genital infections. However, HHV-1 is increasingly being detected in genital lesions, and HHV-2 in orolabial lesions (Bhattarakosol et al. 2005). HHV is highly prevalent in many countries, and HHV infection is a global public health problem (Looker et al. 2015). Cell culture is the classic method used in the laboratory to diagnose herpes infection; however, this method is time-consuming and has low sensitivity (Curtin et al. 2013). The ability to detect nucleic acid has had a major impact on clinical virology diagnosis (Niesters 2002). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely used in HHV research, and among the available PCR methods, quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) has the advantages of speed and quantification. In qPCR, the viral load is measured as the copy number per cell or percentage of total DNA by using a standard curve. A standard curve is generated by qPCR using a dilution series of a DNA template, which is commonly generated from plasmid DNA or DNA oligonucleotides (Tourinho et al. 2015). The advantage of using DNA oligonucleotides is that only the nucleotide sequence needs to be synthesized. For laboratories that do not have enough space or funding for molecular cloning, synthetic curves could be used as an alternative for quantification (Tourinho et al. 2015). Based on these advantages, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential use of a DNA synthetic oligo as a standard for HHV-1 and HHV-2 quantification. HPLC-purified oligonucleotides representing an 84-bp sequence of glycoprotein D in HHV-1 and a 91-bp sequence of glycoprotein G in HHV-2 were synthesized (Table I). The DNA oligonucleotides were diluted in DNase/RNase-free distilled water to 100 pmol/µL, which is approximately 1013 DNA molecules/µL, according to Avogadro’s number (Tourinho et al. 2015). These templates were evaluated by qPCR using the primers and probes previously described by Weidmann et al. (2008). Each qPCR contained 12.5 µL of TaqMan® Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 2 µM of each primer, 1.5 µM of probe, and DNase- and RNase-free H2O. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95ºC for 10 min (initial denaturation and polymerase activation) followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95ºC for 15 s, and annealing and extension at 60ºC for 60 s. In this study, the standard curves were replaced with a ten-fold dilution series (101-1020) of Ultramer® oligonucleotides. After determining the dilution range for each synthetic curve, they were assayed along with DNA for use as a standard curve to quantify virus in copies/µL.
TABLE I

Human herpesvirus-1 (HHV-1) and Human herpesvirus-2 (HHV-2) synthetic (oligo) standard curves

Synthetic ultramerSequenceSize (pb)Amount of oligo (nmoles)
HHV-15’-TTCGTCTCGTAAAATGGCCCCTCCCGTATGGTTCGTCGGTGTGGTCGGTATGGATGCGTCGATAGTGTCACACGGCCGCTGATA-3’914.4
HHV-25’-ATGCTATCTACCCACACACAGACCCACGTACGATCTGGTATCTGGTACTCGAATGTCTCCGCGCATGCAGGGAAGCATTTACGAGAGCGCTGATC-3842.8
Each dilution of the HHV-1 and HHV-2 synthetic curves was compared to the DNA standard curve from virus preparations (quantification range was 100-108 copies/µL). First, the cycle thresholds (CT) of the viral DNA and synthetic oligo curves for both viruses (HHV-1 and HHV-2) were compared. For HHV-1, the CT differences between the DNA and synthetic curves were 0.29-1.28, and for HHV-2, the differences were 0.18-1.1. The amplification efficiency values were E = 97.2% (slope = -3.432, R2 = 0.996), with a detection limit of 102 copies/µL for the HHV-1 synthetic curves, and E = 98.4% (slope = -3.285, R2 = 0.998), with a detection limit of 101 copies/µL for the HHV-2 synthetic curves (Figure). The standard curve included seven dilution points, and the quantification ranged from 102 to 108 copies/µL for HHV-1 and from 101 to 107 copies/µL for HHV-2. After evaluating the synthetic standard curves, they were used to quantify HHV-1 and HHV-2 levels in 33 clinical samples by real time qPCR as described above. The 33 samples, which were previously tested by qualitative PCR and with known viral loads, included 15 clinical samples of HHV-1 (two from cell culture, five lesions, five serum samples, and three saliva samples) and 18 clinical samples of HHV-2 (two from cell culture, three lesions, eight serum samples, two saliva samples, and three cervical scrapes). The assay results did not exhibit any discordance by quantitative or qualitative PCR. Furthermore, when DNA samples (each with 20 ng of DNA) from different sources were tested with both standard curves, the absolute quantification did not exceed one log (Table II).
TABLE II

Comparison of the absolute quantification of human herpesvirus-positive (HHV) samples using synthetic and DNA standard curves

HHV-1HHV-2


SamplesDNA curve (copies/uL)Synthetic curve (copies/uL)SamplesDNA curve (copies/uL)Synthetic curve (copies/uL)
Lesion 11.3x106 2.5x106 Cervical scrape 17.8x105 6.7x105
Lesion 21.5x104 2.9x104 Cervical scrape 21.9x104 1.0x104
Lesion 35.7x 106 7.1x106 Cervical scrape 37.9 x 104 6.8x104
Serum 13.2x102 4.3x102 Serum 12.1.x101 5.3x101
Serum 21.0 x100 1.9x100 Serum 22.9x102 3.5x102
Serum 34.6x101 3.8x101 Serum 35.9x100 6.7x100
Serum 42.7x101 1,9x101 Serum 46.8x102 7.6x102
Serum 52.7x102 1.8x102 Serum 51.7x101 4.7x101
Cell culture 18.9x107 9.5x107 Serum 65.2 x101 8.3x101
Cell culture 26.6x107 7.8x107 Serum 73.4x102 4.3x102
Saliva 17.4x103 8.7x103 Serum 86.6x102 7.4x102
Saliva 23.2x103 4.4x103 Cell culture 19.4x106 7.5x106
Saliva 35.9x103 7.1x103 Cell culture 23.2x107 2.4x107
---Saliva 12.9x102 3.8x102
---Saliva 29.1x102 9.8x102
---Lesion 17.5x105 6.3x105
---Lesion 23.3x106 1.5x106
---Lesion 32.2x105 1.0x105
Other authors have described improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of HHV diagnosis, and they were able to detect shedding episodes in the absence of clinical lesions (Aliabadi et al. 2015, da Silva et al. 2015, Bohórquez et al. 2016, Phipps et al. 2016, Ramchandani et al. 2016) and diagnose clinical specimens that had a viral load lower than lesion swabs, such as cerebral fluid, plasma (Tang et al. 2010), saliva, and cervical scrapes, as was demonstrated in the present study. The use of this synthetic curve is currently limited to scientific research laboratories. However, previous studies have shown that oligonucleotides are good alternatives for quantification methods (Bowers & Dhar 2011, Tourinho et al. 2015). This study demonstrated that synthetic curves could be used as alternative standard curves for HHV diagnosis, since they showed similar results when compared to viral DNA curves.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical virology in real time.

Authors:  Hubert G M Niesters
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Effect of template on generating a standard curve for absolute quantification of an RNA virus by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Robert M Bowers; Arun K Dhar
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Increase of genital HSV-1 and mixed HSV-1 and HSV-2 infection in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Parvapan Bhattarakosol; Sutida Visaprom; Ajchariyarat Sangdara; Vanida Mungmee
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2005-09

4.  Viral loads of herpes simplex virus in clinical samples--a 5-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Julian W Tang; Mingxuan Lin; Lily Chiu; Evelyn S C Koay
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Shedding Among Adults With and Without HIV Infection in Uganda.

Authors:  Warren Phipps; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Elizabeth M Krantz; Stacy Selke; Meei-Li Huang; Fred Kambugu; Jackson Orem; Corey Casper; Lawrence Corey; Anna Wald
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Shedding in Tears and Nasal and Oral Mucosa of Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Meena Ramchandani; Marlene Kong; Elizabeth Tronstein; Stacy Selke; Anna Mikhaylova; Amalia Magaret; Meei-Li Huang; Christine Johnston; Lawrence Corey; Anna Wald
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Shedding of HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, and EBV in the saliva of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients at Fundación HOMI - Hospital de la Misericordia, Bogotá, D.C.

Authors:  Sonia P Bohórquez; Juliana Díaz; Claudia M Rincón; Marcela Estupiñán; Mauricio Chaparro; Ana María Low-Calle; Jaime E Castellanos
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 0.935

8.  Genotypic Characterization of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Isolates in Immunocompromised Patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Amanda Perse da Silva; Amanda de Oliveira Lopes; Yasmine Rangel Vieira; Adilson José de Almeida; Fernando Samuel Sion; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Sandra Wagner; Vanessa Salete de Paula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Challenges in designing a Taqman-based multiplex assay for the simultaneous detection of Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 and Varicella-zoster virus.

Authors:  Manfred Weidmann; Katrin Armbruster; Frank T Hufert
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Diagnosing of herpes simplex virus infections in suspected patients using real-time PCR.

Authors:  Nasrin Aliabadi; Marzieh Jamalidoust; Sadaf Asaei; Mandana Namayandeh; Mazyar Ziyaeyan
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 0.747

View more
  3 in total

1.  Herpesvirus and neurological manifestations in patients with severe coronavirus disease.

Authors:  Vanessa Cristine de Souza Carneiro; Soniza Vieira Alves-Leon; Dmitry José de Santana Sarmento; Wagner Luis da Costa Nunes Pimentel Coelho; Otacilio da Cruz Moreira; Andreza Lemos Salvio; Carlos Henrique Ferreira Ramos; Carlos Henrique Ferreira Ramos Filho; Carla Augusta Barreto Marques; João Paulo da Costa Gonçalves; Luciane Almeida Amado Leon; Vanessa Salete de Paula
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Quantification of M13 and T7 bacteriophages by TaqMan and SYBR green qPCR.

Authors:  Xiujuan Peng; Alex Nguyen; Debadyuti Ghosh
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.014

3.  Novel variants of human herpesvirus 2 from Brazilian HIV-1 coinfected subjects.

Authors:  Lyana Rodrigues Pinto Lima; Nathália Alves de Araújo; Alexandro Guterres; José Henrique Pilotto; Christian Niel; Vanessa Salete de Paula
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.743

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.