Literature DB >> 28225654

Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light.

Manuela Buonanno1, Brian Ponnaiya1, David Welch1, Milda Stanislauskas2, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson1, Lubomir Smilenov1, Franklin D Lowy3, David M Owens2,4, David J Brenner1.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that 207-nm ultraviolet (UV) light has similar antimicrobial properties as typical germicidal UV light (254 nm), but without inducing mammalian skin damage. The biophysical rationale is based on the limited penetration distance of 207-nm light in biological samples (e.g. stratum corneum) compared with that of 254-nm light. Here we extended our previous studies to 222-nm light and tested the hypothesis that there exists a narrow wavelength window in the far-UVC region, from around 200-222 nm, which is significantly harmful to bacteria, but without damaging cells in tissues. We used a krypton-chlorine (Kr-Cl) excimer lamp that produces 222-nm UV light with a bandpass filter to remove the lower- and higher-wavelength components. Relative to respective controls, we measured: 1. in vitro killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a function of UV fluence; 2. yields of the main UV-associated premutagenic DNA lesions (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts) in a 3D human skin tissue model in vitro; 3. eight cellular and molecular skin damage endpoints in exposed hairless mice in vivo. Comparisons were made with results from a conventional 254-nm UV germicidal lamp used as positive control. We found that 222-nm light kills MRSA efficiently but, unlike conventional germicidal UV lamps (254 nm), it produces almost no premutagenic UV-associated DNA lesions in a 3D human skin model and it is not cytotoxic to exposed mammalian skin. As predicted by biophysical considerations and in agreement with our previous findings, far-UVC light in the range of 200-222 nm kills bacteria efficiently regardless of their drug-resistant proficiency, but without the skin damaging effects associated with conventional germicidal UV exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28225654      PMCID: PMC5552051          DOI: 10.1667/RR0010CC.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  49 in total

1.  The effects of ultraviolet radiation on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro.

Authors:  T A Conner-Kerr; P K Sullivan; J Gaillard; M E Franklin; R M Jones
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. II. Animal models for human skin.

Authors:  R L Bronaugh; R F Stewart; E R Congdon
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Wavelength dependency of cataracts in albino mice following chronic exposure.

Authors:  J G Jose; D G Pitts
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.

Authors:  Benedetta Allegranzi; Peter Bischoff; Stijn de Jonge; N Zeynep Kubilay; Bassim Zayed; Stacey M Gomes; Mohamed Abbas; Jasper J Atema; Sarah Gans; Miranda van Rijen; Marja A Boermeester; Matthias Egger; Jan Kluytmans; Didier Pittet; Joseph S Solomkin
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Bactericidal effect of ultraviolet C (UVC), direct and filtered through transparent plastic, on gram-positive cocci: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Bhamini K Rao; Pramod Kumar; Sugandhi Rao; Bimala Gurung
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  The history of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for air disinfection.

Authors:  Nicholas G Reed
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rates.

Authors:  O M Lidwell; E J Lowbury; W Whyte; R Blowers; S J Stanley; D Lowe
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Long-term alteration in the expression of keratins 6 and 16 in the epidermis of mice after chronic UVB exposure.

Authors:  Tomohiko Sano; Takuji Kume; Tsutomu Fujimura; Hiromitsu Kawada; Kazuhiko Higuchi; Maeko Iwamura; Mitsuyuki Hotta; Takashi Kitahara; Yoshinori Takema
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  207-nm UV Light-A Promising Tool for Safe Low-Cost Reduction of Surgical Site Infections. II: In-Vivo Safety Studies.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Milda Stanislauskas; Brian Ponnaiya; Alan W Bigelow; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Yanping Xu; Igor Shuryak; Lubomir Smilenov; David M Owens; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  40 in total

1.  DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation.

Authors:  Willie Taylor; Emily Camilleri; D Levi Craft; George Korza; Maria Rocha Granados; Jaliyah Peterson; Renata Szczpaniak; Sandra K Weller; Ralf Moeller; Thierry Douki; Wendy W K Mok; Peter Setlow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  UVC-based photoinactivation as an efficient tool to control the transmission of coronaviruses.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Bhardwaj; Harpreet Singh; Akash Deep; Madhu Khatri; Jayeeta Bhaumik; Ki-Hyun Kim; Neha Bhardwaj
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  A Review of Recent Evidence for Utilizing Ultraviolet Irradiation Technology to Disinfect Both Indoor Air and Surfaces.

Authors:  Farhad Memarzadeh
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Gierke; Martin Hessling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  A Tn-seq Screen of Streptococcus pneumoniae Uncovers DNA Repair as the Major Pathway for Desiccation Tolerance and Transmission.

Authors:  Allison J Matthews; Hannah M Rowe; Jason W Rosch; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Chiappa; B Frascella; G P Vigezzi; M Moro; L Diamanti; L Gentile; P Lago; N Clementi; C Signorelli; N Mancini; A Odone
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Multiple fields manipulation on nitride material structures in ultraviolet light-emitting diodes.

Authors:  Jinchai Li; Na Gao; Duanjun Cai; Wei Lin; Kai Huang; Shuping Li; Junyong Kang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 17.782

8.  Exposure of Human Skin Models to KrCl Excimer Lamps: The Impact of Optical Filtering.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; David Welch; David J Brenner
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Skin tolerant inactivation of multiresistant pathogens using far-UVC LEDs.

Authors:  Johannes Glaab; Neysha Lobo-Ploch; Hyun Kyong Cho; Thomas Filler; Heiko Gundlach; Martin Guttmann; Sylvia Hagedorn; Silke B Lohan; Frank Mehnke; Johannes Schleusener; Claudia Sicher; Luca Sulmoni; Tim Wernicke; Lucas Wittenbecher; Ulrike Woggon; Paula Zwicker; Axel Kramer; Martina C Meinke; Michael Kneissl; Markus Weyers; Ulrike Winterwerber; Sven Einfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 10.  Photosensitization With Supramolecular Arrays for Enhanced Antimicrobial Photodynamic Treatments.

Authors:  Cecilia Vera; Fiorella Tulli; Claudio D Borsarelli
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.