Literature DB >> 23099124

Waiting and weighting: Information sampling is a balance between efficiency and error-reduction.

Kimberly M Meier1, Mark R Blair.   

Abstract

The current study investigates the relative extent to which information utility and planning efficiency guide information-sampling strategies in a classification task. Prior research has pointed to the importance of probability gain, the degree to which sampling a feature reduces the chance of error, in contexts where participants are restricted to one sample. We monitored participants as they sampled information in an unrestricted context and recorded whether they began their search with a high gain feature or an efficient feature that ultimately allowed for fewer samples per trial. Participants preferred to sample the more efficient feature first, especially when feature information had a higher access cost (Experiment 1). When access costs were all but eliminated using eye-tracking (Experiment 2), participants' fixations still emphasized efficiency over high probability gain, though probability gain was shown to influence access patterns.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099124     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Multiple Feature Value Category Structure Learning: The Role of Unique Features.

Authors:  Zhiya Liu; Xiaohong Song; Carol A Seger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning.

Authors:  Katerina Dolguikh; Tyrus Tracey; Mark R Blair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  LAG-1: A dynamic, integrative model of learning, attention, and gaze.

Authors:  Jordan Barnes; Mark R Blair; R Calen Walshe; Paul F Tupper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparing virtual reality, desktop-based 3D, and 2D versions of a category learning experiment.

Authors:  Robin Colin Alexander Barrett; Rollin Poe; Justin William O'Camb; Cal Woodruff; Scott Marcus Harrison; Katerina Dolguikh; Christine Chuong; Amanda Dawn Klassen; Ruilin Zhang; Rohan Ben Joseph; Mark Randall Blair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice.

Authors:  Hildward Vandormael; Santiago Herce Castañón; Jan Balaguer; Vickie Li; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Learning-induced changes in attentional allocation during categorization: a sizable catalog of attention change as measured by eye movements.

Authors:  Caitlyn M McColeman; Jordan I Barnes; Lihan Chen; Kimberly M Meier; R Calen Walshe; Mark R Blair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.