Literature DB >> 28222878

Clinical complications and quality assessments with computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review.

Mathew T Kattadiyil1, Abdulaziz AlHelal2, Brian J Goodacre3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Computer-engineered complete dentures (CECDs) have significant potential as shown by recent reports of outcomes and specific applications. An understanding of complications and quality assessment factors associated with CECDs from compiled data is lacking in published reports.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the clinical complications and quality assessments related to CECDs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic searches of publications in English from January 1984 to September 2016 were performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, with the results enriched by manual searches and citation mining to address 2 population intervention comparison outcome (PICO) questions: what are the clinical complications associated with CECDs, and what are the quality assessments with CECDs?
RESULTS: A review of 5 selected articles (limited data) on CECDs revealed patient dissatisfaction related to overall outcome (25.49%), inadequate retention (20.73%), and esthetic concerns (15.09%) as common complications. Quality assessment factors that were used to report complications were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient dissatisfaction, inadequate retention, and inadequate esthetics were the most common complications with CECDs. The addition of a trial placement option for CECDs could result in a better clinical outcome, reducing the incidence of other complications related to occlusal vertical dimension, centric relationship, tooth arrangement, and esthetics, improving patient satisfaction, and reducing remakes. The difficulty in reading the digital preview for an objective assessment before fabrication is a unique but not a common, complication for CECDs.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28222878     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Tissue Surface Adaptation and Clinical Performance of CAD-CAM Milled versus Conventional Implant-Assisted Mandibular Overdenture.

Authors:  Noha H El-Shaheed; Hanadi A Lamfon; Rabab I Salama; Amira Mohammed Gomaa Faramawy; Aisha Zakaria Hashem Mostafa
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Chemo-Mechanical Approach to Improve Repair Bond Strength of Denture Teeth.

Authors:  Zahra A AlZaher; Danah F Almaskin; Masoumah S Qaw; Tahani H Abu Showmi; Reem Abualsaud; Sultan Akhtar; Mohammed M Gad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 3.  Advantages of CAD/CAM versus Conventional Complete Dentures - A Review.

Authors:  Nadica Mihajlo Janeva; Gordana Kovacevska; Saso Elencevski; Sanja Panchevska; Aneta Mijoska; Bisera Lazarevska
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 4.  Considerations for the Prosthetic Dental Treatment of Geriatric Patients in Germany.

Authors:  Ina Nitschke; Anja Wendland; Sophia Weber; Julia Jockusch; Bernd Lethaus; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Evaluation of two computer-aided design software on the adaptation of digitally constructed maxillary complete denture.

Authors:  Eman G Abd El Galil; Shaimaa L Mohamed; Fardos N Rizk; Marwa E Sabet
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In-vitro Studies.

Authors:  Reem Abualsaud; Mohammed M Gad
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.