| Literature DB >> 28222640 |
Zhencun Cai1, Lianyong Li1, Lijun Zhang1, Shijun Ji1, Qun Zhao1.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of dynamic long leg casting in paediatric patients with developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) diagnosed at 12-18 months. Methods The adductor tenotomy, closed reduction, and dynamic long leg casting method was adopted to treat paediatric patients with DDH. The hips were divided into four groups according to the Tonnis radiographic dislocation classification. Groups were also classified according to the baseline acetabular index (AI): 30°-35°, 36°-40°, and > 40°. The outcomes of the reductions were evaluated according to McKay's hip function criteria and Severin's radiological criteria. Results A total of 246 patients (339 hips) had complete follow-up data. After 3 months of orthosis fixation, the results were satisfactory in 264 hips (77.88%). Hip function was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 43 of 51 (84.31%) Tonnis type 1 hips, 125 of 155 (80.65%) type 2 hips, 70 of 90 (77.78%) type 3 hips, and 34 of 43 (79.07%) type 4 hips. The higher the baseline AI, the lower the rates of 'excellent' and 'good' hip function. Favourable radiological results (Severin types I and II) were found in 266 of 339 (78.47) hips. Conclusions Dynamic long leg casting is an effective method for treating patients with DDH aged 12-18 months at diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: Hip dislocation treatment; closed reduction treatment; infants; long-term outcome
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28222640 PMCID: PMC5536605 DOI: 10.1177/0300060516675110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Definition of different clinical classifications that were used in this study to determine the outcome of the adductor tenotomy, closed reduction, and dynamic long leg casting method in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed between the ages of 12 and 18 months.
| Classification | Definition | Grade and criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Tonnis classification | Radiological grades of dislocation | Type 1: Femoral capital epiphysis medial to Perkin’s line and below Hilgenreiner’s line |
| Type 2: Epiphysis below Hilgenreiner’s line but lateral to Perkin’s line | ||
| Type 3: Epiphysis lateral to Perkin’s line at the level of the acetabular margin | ||
| Type 4: Epiphysis lateral to Perkin’s line and above the acetabular rim | ||
| McKay’s criteria | Function of hip | Excellent: Painless, stable hip; no limp; more than 15° of internal rotation |
| Good: Painless, stable hip; slight limp or decreased motion; negative Trendelenburg’s sign | ||
| Fair: Minimum pain; moderate stiffness; positive Trendelenburg’s sign | ||
| Poor: Significant pain | ||
| Severin’s classification | Evaluation of radiographic results | Type I: Normal hips |
| Type II: Concentric reduction of the joint with deformity of the femoral neck, head or acetabulum | ||
| Type III: Dysplastic hips without subluxation | ||
| Type IV: Subluxation | ||
| Type V: The head articulating with a secondary acetabulum in the upper part of the original acetabulum | ||
| Type VI: Redislocation | ||
| Salter’s criteria | Presentation of avascular necrosis | Yes or No |
Figure 1.(a) Dynamic frog casting fixation. Abduction-adduction motion of hips is limited. Hip joint can make 80°–110° flexion-extension motion and some rotation. The ankle can move freely. (b) Front of the adjustable abductions orthosis. (c) Back of the adjustable abductions orthosis.
Relationship between baseline Tonnis types before reduction was undertaken and the McKay’s criteria achieved after treatment was complete (n = 339).
| Tonnis type | Total hips | McKay’s hip function criteria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Total ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ rate[ | ||
| 1 | 51 | 27 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 43 (84.31) |
| 2 | 155 | 92 | 33 | 16 | 14 | 125 (80.65) |
| 3 | 90 | 35 | 35 | 11 | 9 | 70 (77.78) |
| 4 | 43 | 15 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 34 (79.07) |
| Total | 339 | 169 | 103 | 37 | 30 | 272 (80.24) |
Data presented as n of hips (%).
No significant difference in the rates of McKay’s criteria of ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ between the four Tonnis type groups; χ2-test (P ≥ 0.05).
Relationship between baseline acetabular index (AI) value before reduction was undertaken and the McKay’s criteria achieved after treatment was complete (n = 339).
| AI value | Total hips | McKay’s hip function criteria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Total ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ rate | ||
| 30°–35° | 106 | 73 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 91 (85.85)[ |
| 36°–40° | 121 | 56 | 44 | 12 | 9 | 100 (82.64)[ |
| > 40° | 112 | 40 | 41 | 15 | 16 | 81 (72.32) |
Data presented as n of hips (%).
Significant difference in the rate of McKay’s criteria of ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ compared with the > 40° group; χ2-test (P ≥ 0.05).