Literature DB >> 28222045

Validation of scaffold design optimization in bone tissue engineering: finite element modeling versus designed experiments.

Nicholas Uth1, Jens Mueller, Byran Smucker, Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi.   

Abstract

This study reports the development of biological/synthetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (TE) via 3D bioplotting. These scaffolds were composed of poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), type I collagen, and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) in an attempt to mimic the extracellular matrix of bone. The solvent used for processing the scaffolds was 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol. The produced scaffolds were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, microcomputed tomography, thermogravimetric analysis, and unconfined compression test. This study also sought to validate the use of finite-element optimization in COMSOL Multiphysics for scaffold design. Scaffold topology was simplified to three factors: nHA content, strand diameter, and strand spacing. These factors affect the ability of the scaffold to bear mechanical loads and how porous the structure can be. Twenty four scaffolds were constructed according to an I-optimal, split-plot designed experiment (DE) in order to generate experimental models of the factor-response relationships. Within the design region, the DE and COMSOL models agreed in their recommended optimal nHA (30%) and strand diameter (460 μm). However, the two methods disagreed by more than 30% in strand spacing (908 μm for DE; 601 μm for COMSOL). Seven scaffolds were 3D-bioplotted to validate the predictions of DE and COMSOL models (4.5-9.9 MPa measured moduli). The predictions for these scaffolds showed relative agreement for scaffold porosity (mean absolute percentage error of 4% for DE and 13% for COMSOL), but were substantially poorer for scaffold modulus (51% for DE; 21% for COMSOL), partly due to some simplifying assumptions made by the models. Expanding the design region in future experiments (e.g., higher nHA content and strand diameter), developing an efficient solvent evaporation method, and exerting a greater control over layer overlap could allow developing PLGA-nHA-collagen scaffolds to meet the mechanical requirements for bone TE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28222045     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Tissue Engineering Strategies for the Treatment of Joint Damage.

Authors:  Makeda K Stephenson; Ashley L Farris; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  I-Optimal design of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid/hydroxyapatite three-dimensional scaffolds produced by thermally induced phase separation.

Authors:  Junyi Liu; Jing Zhang; Paul F James; Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi
Journal:  Polym Eng Sci       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.428

3.  Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Robert Choe; Eoin Devoy; Blake Kuzemchak; Mary Sherry; Erfan Jabari; Jonathan D Packer; John P Fisher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 4.  Utilization of Finite Element Analysis for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chaudhry R Hassan; Yi-Xian Qin; David E Komatsu; Sardar M Z Uddin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Mechanobiological Approach to Design and Optimize Bone Tissue Scaffolds 3D Printed with Fused Deposition Modeling: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Percoco; Antonio Emmanuele Uva; Michele Fiorentino; Michele Gattullo; Vito Modesto Manghisi; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Time-lapsed imaging of nanocomposite scaffolds reveals increased bone formation in dynamic compression bioreactors.

Authors:  Gian Nutal Schädli; Jolanda R Vetsch; Robert P Baumann; Anke M de Leeuw; Esther Wehrle; Marina Rubert; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 7.  Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tiago Pires; John W C Dunlop; Paulo Rui Fernandes; André P G Castro
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 8.  Application of Computational Method in Designing a Unit Cell of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold: A Review.

Authors:  Nur Syahirah Mustafa; Nor Hasrul Akhmal; Sudin Izman; Mat Hussin Ab Talib; Ashrul Ishak Mohamad Shaiful; Mohd Nazri Bin Omar; Nor Zaiazmin Yahaya; Suhaimi Illias
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-06-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.