BACKGROUND: Increased psychophysiological reactivity is a hallmark intermediate phenotype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Individuals with PTSD exhibit greater skin conductance (SC) responses to trauma scripts than trauma survivors without PTSD. However, trauma scripts require time for development and cannot be easily used in a single visit. Thus, there is a need for a low-cost, easy-to-use, SC recording protocol for PTSD assessment. METHODS: Using a mobile device (eSense) connected to a portable tablet computer, we assessed SC reactivity to a standard trauma interview (STI) in 63 participants recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, approximately 1 year after trauma exposure. SC response (SCR) was calculated by subtracting the SC level (SCL) at the end of the baseline recording from the maximum SCL during the STI. RESULTS: SCL was significantly higher during the STI compared to baseline (P < .001), and individuals with PTSD showed significantly greater SCR than individuals without PTSD (P = .006). Logistic regression using SCR with PTSD diagnosis as the outcome showed an odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.78). Lastly, higher SCR during the STI was also significantly associated with PTSD symptom total score controlling for demographics and trauma severity (b = 0.42, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated feasibility of the use of a mobile device for assessing psychophysiological reactivity in those with PTSD. The use of this low-cost, easy-to-use mobile device to collect objective physiological data in concert with a STI can be easily disseminated in clinical and research settings.
BACKGROUND: Increased psychophysiological reactivity is a hallmark intermediate phenotype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Individuals with PTSD exhibit greater skin conductance (SC) responses to trauma scripts than trauma survivors without PTSD. However, trauma scripts require time for development and cannot be easily used in a single visit. Thus, there is a need for a low-cost, easy-to-use, SC recording protocol for PTSD assessment. METHODS: Using a mobile device (eSense) connected to a portable tablet computer, we assessed SC reactivity to a standard trauma interview (STI) in 63 participants recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, approximately 1 year after trauma exposure. SC response (SCR) was calculated by subtracting the SC level (SCL) at the end of the baseline recording from the maximum SCL during the STI. RESULTS: SCL was significantly higher during the STI compared to baseline (P < .001), and individuals with PTSD showed significantly greater SCR than individuals without PTSD (P = .006). Logistic regression using SCR with PTSD diagnosis as the outcome showed an odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.78). Lastly, higher SCR during the STI was also significantly associated with PTSD symptom total score controlling for demographics and trauma severity (b = 0.42, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated feasibility of the use of a mobile device for assessing psychophysiological reactivity in those with PTSD. The use of this low-cost, easy-to-use mobile device to collect objective physiological data in concert with a STI can be easily disseminated in clinical and research settings.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Margaret R Bauer; Anna M Ruef; Suzanne L Pineles; Sandra J Japuntich; Michael L Macklin; Natasha B Lasko; Scott P Orr Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2013-07-01
Authors: Barbara O Rothbaum; Megan C Kearns; Emily Reiser; Jennifer S Davis; Kimberly A Kerley; Alex O Rothbaum; Kristina B Mercer; Matthew Price; Debra Houry; Kerry J Ressler Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Lisa M McTeague; Peter J Lang; Marie-Claude Laplante; Bruce N Cuthbert; Joshua R Shumen; Margaret M Bradley Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Charles F Gillespie; Bekh Bradley; Kristie Mercer; Alicia K Smith; Karen Conneely; Mark Gapen; Tamara Weiss; Ann C Schwartz; Joseph F Cubells; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Charis N Wiltshire; Cassandra P Wanna; Anaïs F Stenson; Sean T Minton; Mariam H Reda; William M Davie; Rebecca Hinrichs; Sterling Winters; John M France; Tanja Jovanovic Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2022-01-10
Authors: Alyssa R Roeckner; Shivangi Sogani; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Rebecca Hinrichs; Sanne J H van Rooij; Barbara O Rothbaum; Tanja Jovanovic; Kerry J Ressler; Jennifer S Stevens Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Kerry J Ressler; Sabina Berretta; Vadim Y Bolshakov; Isabelle M Rosso; Edward G Meloni; Scott L Rauch; William A Carlezon Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 44.711
Authors: Peter W Tuerk; Cindy M Schaeffer; Joseph F McGuire; Margo Adams Larsen; Nicole Capobianco; John Piacentini Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Grace K Cushman; Sharon Shih; Mary Gray Stolz; Rebecca C Hinrichs; Tanja Jovanovic; Jennifer L Lee; Subra Kugathasan; Bonney Reed Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.006