BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is characterized as a disorder of exaggerated defensive physiological arousal. The novel aim of the present research was to investigate within PTSD a potential dose-response relationship between past trauma recurrence and current comorbidity and intensity of physiological reactions to imagery of trauma and other aversive scenarios. METHODS: A community sample of principal PTSD (n = 49; 22 single-trauma exposed, 27 multiple-trauma exposed) and control (n = 76; 46 never-trauma exposed, 30 trauma exposed) participants imagined threatening and neutral events while acoustic startle probes were presented and the eye-blink response (orbicularis occuli) was recorded. Changes in heart rate, skin conductance level, and facial expressivity were also indexed. RESULTS: Overall, PTSD patients exceeded control participants in startle reflex, autonomic responding, and facial expressivity during idiographic trauma imagery and, though less pronounced, showed heightened reactivity to standard anger, panic, and physical danger imagery. Concerning subgroups, control participants with and without trauma exposure showed isomorphic patterns. Within PTSD, only the single-trauma patients evinced robust startle and autonomic responses, exceeding both control participants and multiple-trauma PTSD. Despite greater reported arousal, the multiple-trauma relative to single-trauma PTSD group showed blunted defensive reactivity associated with more chronic and severe PTSD, greater mood and anxiety disorder comorbidity, and more pervasive dimensional dysphoria (e.g., depression, trait anxiety). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas PTSD patients generally show marked physiological arousal during aversive imagery, concordant with self-reported distress, the most symptomatic patients with histories of severe, cumulative traumatization show discordant physiological hyporeactivity, perhaps attributable to sustained high stress and an egregious, persistent negative affectivity that ultimately compromises defensive responding. 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is characterized as a disorder of exaggerated defensive physiological arousal. The novel aim of the present research was to investigate within PTSD a potential dose-response relationship between past trauma recurrence and current comorbidity and intensity of physiological reactions to imagery of trauma and other aversive scenarios. METHODS: A community sample of principal PTSD (n = 49; 22 single-trauma exposed, 27 multiple-trauma exposed) and control (n = 76; 46 never-trauma exposed, 30 trauma exposed) participants imagined threatening and neutral events while acoustic startle probes were presented and the eye-blink response (orbicularis occuli) was recorded. Changes in heart rate, skin conductance level, and facial expressivity were also indexed. RESULTS: Overall, PTSDpatients exceeded control participants in startle reflex, autonomic responding, and facial expressivity during idiographic trauma imagery and, though less pronounced, showed heightened reactivity to standard anger, panic, and physical danger imagery. Concerning subgroups, control participants with and without trauma exposure showed isomorphic patterns. Within PTSD, only the single-traumapatients evinced robust startle and autonomic responses, exceeding both control participants and multiple-trauma PTSD. Despite greater reported arousal, the multiple-trauma relative to single-trauma PTSD group showed blunted defensive reactivity associated with more chronic and severe PTSD, greater mood and anxiety disorder comorbidity, and more pervasive dimensional dysphoria (e.g., depression, trait anxiety). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas PTSDpatients generally show marked physiological arousal during aversive imagery, concordant with self-reported distress, the most symptomatic patients with histories of severe, cumulative traumatization show discordant physiological hyporeactivity, perhaps attributable to sustained high stress and an egregious, persistent negative affectivity that ultimately compromises defensive responding. 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. All rights reserved.
Authors: R K Pitman; D M Lanes; S K Williston; J L Guillaume; L J Metzger; G M Gehr; S P Orr Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: R A Lanius; P C Williamson; M Densmore; K Boksman; M A Gupta; R W Neufeld; J S Gati; R S Menon Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jean C Beckham; Scott R Vrana; John C Barefoot; Michelle E Feldman; John Fairbank; Scott D Moore Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2002-02
Authors: Milissa L Kaufman; Matthew O Kimble; Danny G Kaloupek; Lisa M McTeague; Peter Bachrach; Allison M Forti; Terence M Keane Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Lisa M McTeague; Peter J Lang; Marie-Claude Laplante; Bruce N Cuthbert; Cyd C Strauss; Margaret M Bradley Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-11-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Alissa B Jerud; Frank J Farach; Michele Bedard-Gilligan; Hillary Smith; Lori A Zoellner; Norah C Feeny Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Andrea M Jones; Kristen M Shealy; Kathryn Reid-Quiñones; Angela D Moreland; Tatiana M Davidson; Cristina M López; Simone C Barr; Michael A de Arellano Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2013-12-09