Literature DB >> 28220055

Symmetric Directional False Discovery Rate Control.

Sarah E Holte1, Eva K Lee2, Yajun Mei2.   

Abstract

This research is motivated from the analysis of a real gene expression data that aims to identify a subset of "interesting" or "significant" genes for further studies. When we blindly applied the standard false discovery rate (FDR) methods, our biology collaborators were suspicious or confused, as the selected list of significant genes was highly unbalanced: there were ten times more under-expressed genes than the over-expressed genes. Their concerns led us to realize that the observed two-sample t-statistics were highly skewed and asymmetric, and thus the standard FDR methods might be inappropriate. To tackle this case, we propose a symmetric directional FDR control method that categorizes the genes into "over-expressed" and "under-expressed" genes, pairs "over-expressed" and "under-expressed" genes, defines the p-values for gene pairs via column permutations, and then applies the standard FDR method to select "significant" gene pairs instead of "significant" individual genes. We compare our proposed symmetric directional FDR method with the standard FDR method by applying them to simulated data and several well-known real data sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Column permutation; Directional FDR; False discovery rate; Multiple testing; Symmetric decision; Three-decisions

Year:  2016        PMID: 28220055      PMCID: PMC5315456          DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2016.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1572-3127


  7 in total

1.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  I Hedenfalk; D Duggan; Y Chen; M Radmacher; M Bittner; R Simon; P Meltzer; B Gusterson; M Esteller; O P Kallioniemi; B Wilfond; A Borg; J Trent; M Raffeld; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; E Dougherty; J Kononen; L Bubendorf; W Fehrle; S Pittaluga; S Gruvberger; N Loman; O Johannsson; H Olsson; G Sauter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.

Authors:  T R Golub; D K Slonim; P Tamayo; C Huard; M Gaasenbeek; J P Mesirov; H Coller; M L Loh; J R Downing; M A Caligiuri; C D Bloomfield; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Gene set analysis approaches for RNA-seq data: performance evaluation and application guideline.

Authors:  Yasir Rahmatallah; Frank Emmert-Streib; Galina Glazko
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 11.622

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.