Literature DB >> 10521349

Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.

T R Golub1, D K Slonim, P Tamayo, C Huard, M Gaasenbeek, J P Mesirov, H Coller, M L Loh, J R Downing, M A Caligiuri, C D Bloomfield, E S Lander.   

Abstract

Although cancer classification has improved over the past 30 years, there has been no general approach for identifying new cancer classes (class discovery) or for assigning tumors to known classes (class prediction). Here, a generic approach to cancer classification based on gene expression monitoring by DNA microarrays is described and applied to human acute leukemias as a test case. A class discovery procedure automatically discovered the distinction between acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) without previous knowledge of these classes. An automatically derived class predictor was able to determine the class of new leukemia cases. The results demonstrate the feasibility of cancer classification based solely on gene expression monitoring and suggest a general strategy for discovering and predicting cancer classes for other types of cancer, independent of previous biological knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10521349     DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  1938 in total

1.  Comparative genome-scale analysis of gene expression profiles in T cell lymphoma cells during malignant progression using a complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  S Li; D T Ross; M E Kadin; P O Brown; M A Wasik
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Gene expression profiling of lymphomas.

Authors:  U Hegde; W H Wilson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes downregulate expression of interferon-responsive genes and upregulate proliferation-associated and NF-kappaB-responsive genes in cervical keratinocytes.

Authors:  M Nees; J M Geoghegan; T Hyman; S Frank; L Miller; C D Woodworth
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Identifying expressed genes.

Authors:  K J Martin; A B Pardee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs.

Authors:  S Brenner; S R Williams; E H Vermaas; T Storck; K Moon; C McCollum; J I Mao; S Luo; J J Kirchner; S Eletr; R B DuBridge; T Burcham; G Albrecht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  'Gene shaving' as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns.

Authors:  T Hastie; R Tibshirani; M B Eisen; A Alizadeh; R Levy; L Staudt; W C Chan; D Botstein; P Brown
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 7.  New tools in molecular pathology.

Authors:  P Lichter
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data.

Authors:  G Getz; E Levine; E Domany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Ronald Jansen; Dov Greenbaum; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Finding genes in the C2C12 osteogenic pathway by k-nearest-neighbor classification of expression data.

Authors:  Joachim Theilhaber; Timothy Connolly; Sergio Roman-Roman; Steven Bushnell; Amanda Jackson; Kathy Call; Teresa Garcia; Roland Baron
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.