Literature DB >> 28219895

Impact of Practice-Based Management of Pulmonary Artery Pressures in 2000 Patients Implanted With the CardioMEMS Sensor.

J Thomas Heywood1, Rita Jermyn2, David Shavelle2, William T Abraham2, Arvind Bhimaraj2, Kunjan Bhatt2, Fareed Sheikh2, Eric Eichorn2, Sumant Lamba2, Rupinder Bharmi2, Rahul Agarwal2, Charisma Kumar2, Lynne W Stevenson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulmonary artery (PA) pressures in patients with heart failure are associated with a high risk for hospitalization and mortality. Recent clinical trial evidence demonstrated a direct relationship between lowering remotely monitored PA pressures and heart failure hospitalization risk reduction with a novel implantable PA pressure monitoring system (CardioMEMS HF System, St. Jude Medical). This study examines PA pressure changes in the first 2000 US patients implanted in general practice use.
METHODS: Deidentified data from the remote monitoring Merlin.net (St. Jude Medical) database were used to examine PA pressure trends from the first consecutive 2000 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up. Changes in PA pressures were evaluated with an area under the curve methodology to estimate the total sum increase or decrease in pressures (mm Hg-day) during the follow-up period relative to the baseline pressure. As a reference, the PA pressure trends were compared with the historic CHAMPION clinical trial (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association [NYHA] Functional Class III Heart Failure Patients). The area under the curve results are presented as mean±2 SE, and P values comparing the area under the curve of the general-use cohort with outcomes in the CHAMPION trial were computed by the t test with equal variance.
RESULTS: Patients were on average 70±12 years old; 60% were male; 34% had preserved ejection fraction; and patients were followed up for an average of 333±125 days. At implantation, the mean PA pressure for the general-use patients was 34.9±10.2 mm Hg compared with 31.3±10.9 mm Hg for CHAMPION treatment and 32.0±10.5 mm Hg for CHAMPION control groups. The general-use patients had an area under the curve of -32.8 mm Hg-day at the 1-month time mark, -156.2 mm Hg-day at the 3-month time mark, and -434.0 mm Hg-day after 6 months of hemodynamic guided care, which was significantly lower than the treatment group in the CHAMPION trial. Patients consistently transmitted pressure information with a median of 1.27 days between transmissions after 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The first 2000 general-use patients managed with hemodynamic-guided heart failure care had higher PA pressures at baseline and experienced greater reduction in PA pressure over time compared with the pivotal CHAMPION clinical trial. These data demonstrate that general use of implantable hemodynamic technology in a nontrial setting leads to significant lowering of PA pressures.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; hemodynamics; pulmonary artery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28219895     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  36 in total

Review 1.  Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Jasper J Brugts
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 2.  [Telemonitoring and pulmonary artery pressure-guided treatment of heart failure].

Authors:  C E Angermann; S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Postmarketing Adverse Events Related to the CardioMEMS HF System.

Authors:  Muthiah Vaduganathan; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 4.  CardioMEMS, the real progress in heart failure home monitoring.

Authors:  Edoardo Gronda; Emilio Vanoli; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Corrado
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  [Acute and chronic heart failure].

Authors:  K-P Kresoja; G Schmidt; B Kherad; F Krackhardt; F Spillmann; C Tschöpe
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Implantable devices for heart failure monitoring and therapy.

Authors:  Maxwell Eyram Afari; Wajih Syed; Lana Tsao
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current status, unique challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Bharathi Upadhya; Mark J Haykowsky; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Updates in heart failure 30-day readmission prevention.

Authors:  David Goldgrab; Kathir Balakumaran; Min Jung Kim; Sara R Tabtabai
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Implantable devices to monitor patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Nikolaos Karamichalakis; John Parissis; George Bakosis; Vasiliki Bistola; Ignatios Ikonomidis; Antonios Sideris; Gerasimos Filippatos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Safety and feasibility of pulmonary artery pressure-guided heart failure therapy: rationale and design of the prospective CardioMEMS Monitoring Study for Heart Failure (MEMS-HF).

Authors:  Christiane E Angermann; Birgit Assmus; Stefan D Anker; Johannes Brachmann; Georg Ertl; Friedrich Köhler; Stephan Rosenkranz; Carsten Tschöpe; Philip B Adamson; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.