Christiane E Angermann1, Birgit Assmus2, Stefan D Anker3,4, Johannes Brachmann5, Georg Ertl6, Friedrich Köhler7, Stephan Rosenkranz8, Carsten Tschöpe9, Philip B Adamson10, Michael Böhm11. 1. Department of Medicine I, Cardiology, and Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg, University and University Hospital Würzburg, Am Schwarzenberg 15, 97078, Würzburg, Germany. Angermann_C@ukw.de. 2. University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 3. Division of Cardiology and Metabolism and Department of Cardiology & Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, and German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Cardiology & Pneumology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany. 5. Regiomed Hospital Coburg, Coburg, Germany. 6. Department of Medicine I, Cardiology, and Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg, University and University Hospital Würzburg, Am Schwarzenberg 15, 97078, Würzburg, Germany. 7. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany. 8. University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 9. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany. 10. Abbott, Austin, TX, USA. 11. Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wireless monitoring of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures with the CardioMEMS HF™ system is indicated in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure (HF). Randomized and observational trials have shown a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations and improved quality of life in patients using this device in the United States. OBJECTIVE: MEMS-HF is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter study to characterize safety and feasibility of using remote PA pressure monitoring in a real-world setting in Germany, The Netherlands and Ireland. METHODS AND RESULTS: After informed consent, adult patients with NYHA class III HF and a recent HF-related hospitalization are evaluated for suitability for permanent implantation of a CardioMEMS™ sensor. Participation in MEMS-HF is open to qualifying subjects regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with reduced ejection fraction must be on stable guideline-directed pharmacotherapy as tolerated. The study will enroll 230 patients in approximately 35 centers. Expected duration is 36 months (24-month enrolment plus ≥ 12-month follow-up). Primary endpoints are freedom from device/system-related complications and freedom from pressure sensor failure at 12-month post-implant. Secondary endpoints include the annualized rate of HF-related hospitalization at 12 months versus the rate over the 12 months preceding implant, and health-related quality of life. Endpoints will be evaluated using data obtained after each subject's 12-month visit. CONCLUSIONS: The MEMS-HF study will provide robust evidence on the clinical safety and feasibility of implementing haemodynamic monitoring as a novel disease management tool in routine out-patient care in selected European healthcare systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02693691.
BACKGROUND: Wireless monitoring of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures with the CardioMEMS HF™ system is indicated in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure (HF). Randomized and observational trials have shown a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations and improved quality of life in patients using this device in the United States. OBJECTIVE: MEMS-HF is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter study to characterize safety and feasibility of using remote PA pressure monitoring in a real-world setting in Germany, The Netherlands and Ireland. METHODS AND RESULTS: After informed consent, adult patients with NYHA class III HF and a recent HF-related hospitalization are evaluated for suitability for permanent implantation of a CardioMEMS™ sensor. Participation in MEMS-HF is open to qualifying subjects regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with reduced ejection fraction must be on stable guideline-directed pharmacotherapy as tolerated. The study will enroll 230 patients in approximately 35 centers. Expected duration is 36 months (24-month enrolment plus ≥ 12-month follow-up). Primary endpoints are freedom from device/system-related complications and freedom from pressure sensor failure at 12-month post-implant. Secondary endpoints include the annualized rate of HF-related hospitalization at 12 months versus the rate over the 12 months preceding implant, and health-related quality of life. Endpoints will be evaluated using data obtained after each subject's 12-month visit. CONCLUSIONS: The MEMS-HF study will provide robust evidence on the clinical safety and feasibility of implementing haemodynamic monitoring as a novel disease management tool in routine out-patient care in selected European healthcare systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02693691.
Authors: Christiane E Angermann; Stefan Störk; Götz Gelbrich; Hermann Faller; Roland Jahns; Stefan Frantz; Markus Loeffler; Georg Ertl Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Michael R Zile; Tom D Bennett; Stephanie El Hajj; Fred J Kueffer; Catalin F Baicu; William T Abraham; Robert C Bourge; Lynne Warner Stevenson Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Gert Baumann; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Goetz Gelbrich; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D Anker Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Robert C Bourge; Mark F Aaron; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Lynne W Stevenson; Warren Strickland; Suresh Neelagaru; Nirav Raval; Steven Krueger; Stanislav Weiner; David Shavelle; Bradley Jeffries; Jay S Yadav Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sarwat I Chaudhry; Jennifer A Mattera; Jeptha P Curtis; John A Spertus; Jeph Herrin; Zhenqiu Lin; Christopher O Phillips; Beth V Hodshon; Lawton S Cooper; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kevin Damman; Vincent M van Deursen; Gerjan Navis; Adriaan A Voors; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Hans L Hillege Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael M Givertz; Lynne W Stevenson; Maria R Costanzo; Robert C Bourge; Jordan G Bauman; Gregg Ginn; William T Abraham Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Johann Christoph Geller; Thorsten Lewalter; Niels Eske Bruun; Milos Taborsky; Frank Bode; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Christoph Stellbrink; Steffen Schön; Holger Mühling; Hanno Oswald; Sebastian Reif; Stefan Kääb; Peter Illes; Jochen Proff; Nikolaos Dagres; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Michael Böhm; Birgit Assmus; Stefan D Anker; Folkert W Asselbergs; Johannes Brachmann; Marie-Elena Brett; Jasper J Brugts; Georg Ertl; AiJia Wang; Lutz Hilker; Friedrich Koehler; Stephan Rosenkranz; David M Leistner; Amr Abdin; Jan Wintrich; Qian Zhou; Philip B Adamson; Christiane E Angermann Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-11-04