| Literature DB >> 28219431 |
Jing Ma1, Jiong Yu2, Guangshu Hao3, Dan Wang3, Yanni Sun3, Jianxin Lu3, Hongcui Cao4,5, Feiyan Lin6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of high hyperlipemia is increasing around the world. Our aims are to analyze the relationship of triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (TC) with indexes of liver function and kidney function, and to develop a prediction model of TG, TC in overweight people.Entities:
Keywords: Back propagation artificial neural network; Cholesterol; Overweight; Regression; Triglyceride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28219431 PMCID: PMC5319080 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0434-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics and difference of biochemical indexes in healthy and overweight
| Index | Healthy | Overweight |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| fs-TG (mmol/L) | 0.88 | 0.42 | 2.05 | 1.75 | 0.000 |
| fs-GLU (mmol/L) | 5.32 | 0.39 | 5.93 | 1.28 | 0.000 |
| fs-LDL-c (mmol/L) | 2.38 | 0.54 | 2.87 | 0.69 | 0.000 |
| fs-HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.57 | 0.32 | 1.27 | 0.30 | 0.000 |
| fs-TC (mmol/L) | 4.40 | 0.63 | 5.00 | 0.91 | 0.000 |
| fs-ALT (U/L) | 15.31 | 6.99 | 33.39 | 22.60 | 0.000 |
| fs-AST (U/L) | 18.48 | 4.24 | 24.60 | 9.46 | 0.000 |
| fs-GGT (U/L) | 15.23 | 5.96 | 51.57 | 61.95 | 0.000 |
| fs-TP (g/L) | 75.74 | 3.79 | 76.58 | 3.58 | 0.009 |
| fs-ALB (g/L) | 46.69 | 2.47 | 47.42 | 2.68 | 0.000 |
| fs-Cr (μmol/L) | 55.08 | 10.14 | 69.30 | 14.47 | 0.000 |
| fs-BUN (mmol/L) | 4.68 | 1.07 | 5.29 | 1.20 | 0.000 |
| fs-AKP (U/L) | 64.62 | 17.34 | 80.68 | 21.78 | 0.000 |
| fs-TBIL(μmol/L) | 10.04 | 3.15 | 11.36 | 4.09 | 0.000 |
| fs-DBIL(μmol/L) | 3.28 | 1.11 | 3.60 | 1.41 | 0.012 |
| fs-UA (μmol/L) | 261.80 | 42.74 | 364.93 | 88.16 | 0.000 |
Correlation coefficient of fs-TG and fs-TC with indexes of fs-GLU, liver and kidney in healthy and overweight
| Index | Healthy | Overweight | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fs-TG | fs-TC | fs-TG | fs-TC | |||||
| Coefficient |
| Coefficient | P | Coefficient |
| Coefficient |
| |
| Weight | .123* | 0.033 | 0.011 | 0.854 | .325** | 0.000 | -0.074 | 0.227 |
| Height | -0.011 | 0.846 | -0.099 | 0.085 | .270** | 0.000 | -0.088 | 0.147 |
| Age | .271** | 0.000 | .328** | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.922 | .196** | 0.001 |
| BMI | .188** | 0.001 | .122* | 0.033 | .251** | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.681 |
| fs-TG | 1.000 | - | .224** | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | .288** | 0.000 |
| fs-GLU | .123* | 0.032 | .162** | 0.005 | .157** | 0.010 | 0.113 | 0.064 |
| fs-TC | .224** | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | .288** | 0.000 | 1.000 | - |
| fs-ALT | .153** | 0.008 | .202** | 0.000 | .354** | 0.000 | .127* | 0.037 |
| fs-AST | 0.072 | 0.215 | .151** | 0.008 | .233** | 0.000 | .150* | 0.013 |
| fs-GTT | .248** | 0.000 | .151** | 0.009 | .505** | 0.000 | .241** | 0.000 |
| fs-TB | 0.040 | 0.486 | -0.020 | 0.729 | .176** | 0.004 | .182** | 0.003 |
| fs-ALB | -0.047 | 0.415 | 0.017 | 0.773 | .237** | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.415 |
| fs-CR | .146* | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.762 | .271** | 0.000 | -0.060 | 0.329 |
| fs-BUN | -0.096 | 0.096 | .188** | 0.001 | -0.063 | 0.299 | 0.034 | 0.574 |
| fs-AKP | .220** | 0.000 | 0.048 | 0.403 | .221** | 0.000 | 0.065 | 0.287 |
| fs-TBIL | -0.039 | 0.498 | 0.002 | 0.968 | 0.117 | 0.054 | -0.024 | 0.699 |
| fs-DBIL | -.153** | 0.008 | -.273** | 0.000 | -0.080 | 0.192 | -.281** | 0.000 |
| fs-UA | .163** | 0.005 | -0.026 | 0.653 | .413** | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.209 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Regression coefficients of fs-TG, fs-TC MRL model based on independent variables
| Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
| fs-TG | (Constant) | -.171 | .421 | -.405 | .686 | |||
| fs-ALT | .015 | .005 | .191 | 2.889 | .004 | .719 | 1.391 | |
| fs-UA | .004 | .001 | .212 | 3.569 | .000 | .885 | 1.130 | |
| fs-GTT | .004 | .002 | .133 | 2.019 | .044 | .718 | 1.392 | |
| fs-TC | (Constant) | 2.151 | 1.119 | 1.922 | .056 | |||
| fs-DBIL | -.187 | .036 | -.290 | -5.135 | .000 | .960 | 1.042 | |
| fs-GTT | .003 | .001 | .234 | 4.198 | .000 | .981 | 1.019 | |
| AGE | .015 | .005 | .182 | 3.246 | .001 | .970 | 1.030 | |
| fs-TB | .035 | .014 | .136 | 2.463 | .014 | .995 | 1.005 | |
Fig. 1The fitness index of BP-ANN model of fs-TG achieved at epoch 53 (a), fs-TC achieved at epoch 1000 (b) performed in overweight people
Fig. 2The measured concentrations (“+”) of fs-TG (a), fs-TC (b) and predicted concentrations (“o”) of fs-TG, fs-TC generated by BP-ANN Model in overweight people. The training goal was set at 1.5 × 10-5