| Literature DB >> 28219380 |
Mouna Dammak1, Bilel Hadrich1, Ramzi Miladi1, Mohamed Barkallah1, Faiez Hentati1, Ridha Hachicha1, Céline Laroche2,3, Philippe Michaud2,3, Imen Fendri4, Slim Abdelkafi5.
Abstract
<Entities:
Keywords: Bioactive compounds; Biomass; Box-Behnken Design; Microalgae; Starch; Tetraselmis sp.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28219380 PMCID: PMC5319095 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0378-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Variables and experimental levels for F/2 medium culture optimization
| Factors | Symbol | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| NaNO3 (mM) |
| 0.58 | 1.17 | 1.76 |
| NaH2PO4 (mM) |
| 0.018 | 0.036 | 0.054 |
| Trace metals (μL.L-1) |
| 500 | 1000 | 1500 |
| Vitamins (μL.L-1) |
| 250 | 375 | 500 |
Extracellular metals and vitamins concentrations
| Coded Levels | −1 | 0 | +1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular metals concentration | |||
| FeCl3,6H2O (M) | 0.5 10−5 | 1 10−5 | 1.5 10−5 |
| Na2EDTA,2H2O (M) | 0.5 10−5 | 1 10−5 | 1.5 10−5 |
| CuSO4,5H2O (M) | 2 10−8 | 4 10−8 | 6 10−8 |
| Na2MoO4,2H2O (M) | 1.5 10−8 | 3 10−8 | 4.5 10−8 |
| ZnSO4,7H2O (M) | 4 10−8 | 8 10−8 | 12 10−8 |
| CoCl2,6H2O (M) | 2.5 10−8 | 5 10−8 | 7.5 10−8 |
| MnCl2,4H2O (M) | 4.5 10−7 | 9 10−7 | 13.5 10−7 |
| Extracellular vitamins concentration | |||
| Thiamine HCl (vitamin B1) (M) | 1.48 10−7 | 2.22 10−7 | 2.96 10−7 |
| Biotin (vitamin H) (M) | 1.025 10−9 | 1.5375 10−9 | 2.05 10−9 |
| Cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12) (M) | 1.845 10−10 | 2.7675 10−10 | 3.69 10−10 |
Experimental results of Box-Behnken design
| Run No | Factors | Responses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaNO3 (mM) | NaH2PO4 (mM) | Metals (μL.L−1) | Vitamins (μL.L−1) | Biomass (g.L−1) | Total chlorophylls content (mg.g DW−1) | Carotenoids content (mg.g DW−1) | Starch content (g.g DW−1) | |
| 1 | 0.58 | 0.018 | 1000 | 375 | 2.2 | 0.72 | 0.13 | 0.38 |
| 2 | 1.76 | 0.018 | 1000 | 375 | 3.28 | 2.5 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.054 | 1000 | 375 | 1.19 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| 4 | 1.76 | 0.054 | 1000 | 375 | 1.7 | 4.62 | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| 5 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 500 | 250 | 3.37 | 2.04 | 0.06 | 0.38 |
| 6 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 1500 | 250 | 4.57 | 1.15 | 0.12 | 0.26 |
| 7 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 500 | 500 | 3.14 | 3.32 | 0.15 | 0.32 |
| 8 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 1500 | 500 | 2.15 | 3.69 | 0.16 | 0.32 |
| 9 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 1000 | 375 | 2.6 | 3.59 | 0.17 | 0.32 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.036 | 1000 | 250 | 1.95 | 1.41 | 0.17 | 0.42 |
| 11 | 1.76 | 0.036 | 1000 | 250 | 2.91 | 2.5 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| 12 | 0.58 | 0.036 | 1000 | 500 | 1.77 | 2.5 | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| 13 | 1.76 | 0.036 | 1000 | 500 | 2.1 | 4.5 | 0.23 | 0.33 |
| 14 | 1.17 | 0.018 | 500 | 375 | 3.39 | 1.7 | 0.09 | 0.29 |
| 15 | 1.17 | 0.054 | 500 | 375 | 2.61 | 3.48 | 0.1 | 0.33 |
| 16 | 1.17 | 0.018 | 1500 | 375 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 0.05 | 0.36 |
| 17 | 1.17 | 0.054 | 1500 | 375 | 1.72 | 3.5 | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| 18 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 1000 | 375 | 2.37 | 3.71 | 0.17 | 0.33 |
| 19 | 0.58 | 0.036 | 500 | 375 | 1.94 | 2.3 | 0.16 | 0.37 |
| 20 | 1.76 | 0.036 | 500 | 375 | 1.62 | 3.7 | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| 21 | 0.58 | 0.036 | 1500 | 375 | 1.85 | 2 | 0.18 | 0.33 |
| 22 | 1.76 | 0.036 | 1500 | 375 | 2.55 | 3.61 | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| 23 | 1.17 | 0.018 | 1000 | 250 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 0.04 | 0.28 |
| 24 | 1.17 | 0.054 | 1000 | 250 | 2.1 | 3.38 | 0.19 | 0.38 |
| 25 | 1.17 | 0.018 | 1000 | 500 | 1.99 | 2.42 | 0.16 | 0.32 |
| 26 | 1.17 | 0.054 | 1000 | 500 | 2.2 | 4.92 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| 27 | 1.17 | 0.036 | 1000 | 375 | 2.15 | 3.72 | 0.19 | 0.37 |
Analysis of variance of the model for biomass production
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.88 | 1 | 0.88 | 17.49 | 0.05 |
|
| 4.01 | 1 | 4.01 | 79.37 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.20 | 1 | 0.20 | 4.05 | 0.18 |
|
| 3.79 | 1 | 3.79 | 74.98 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | 1.60 | 0.33 |
|
| 0.26 | 1 | 0.26 | 5.13 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.09 | 1 | 0.09 | 1.95 | 0.29 |
|
| 1.32 | 1 | 1.32 | 26.11 | <0.05 |
|
| 2.73 | 1 | 2.73 | 54.09 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.19 | 1 | 1.19 | 23.68 | <0.05 |
|
| 2.25 | 1 | 2.25 | 44.50 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.37 | 1 | 0.37 | 7.39 | 0.11 |
|
| 0.99 | 1 | 0.99 | 19.58 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.84 | 1 | 0.84 | 16.74 | 0.05 |
| Lack of fit | 1.42 | 10 | 0.14 | 2.81 | 0.29 |
| Pure error | 0.10 | 2 | 0.05 | ||
| Total | 25.82 | 26 |
R2 = 0.94
Fig. 1Contour plots and response surface plot showing the F/2 nutrients effect on biomass production
Analysis of variance of the model for total chlorophylls production
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.45 | 1 | 6.45 | 1233.12 | <0.05 |
|
| 9.77 | 1 | 9.77 | 1866.88 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.13 | 1 | 0.13 | 26.49 | <0.05 |
|
| 8.45 | 1 | 8.45 | 1614.72 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.18 | 1 | 0.18 | 35.33 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 2.10 | 0.28 |
|
| 0.20 | 1 | 0.20 | 39.55 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 8.42 | 0.10 |
|
| 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.30 | 0.63 |
|
| 0.39 | 1 | 0.39 | 75.84 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.54 | 1 | 0.54 | 103.81 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.06 | 1 | 1.06 | 203.32 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.93 | 1 | 1.93 | 370.45 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.32 | 1 | 1.32 | 252.65 | <0.05 |
| Lack of fit | 0.63 | 10 | 0.06 | 12.04 | 0.07 |
| Pure error | 0.01 | 2 | 0.005 | ||
| Total | 35.89 | 26 |
R2 = 0 .98
Analysis of variance of the model for carotenoids production
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0008 | 1 | 0.0008 | 6.25 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 188.48 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 25 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 105.06 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.004 | 1 | 0.004 | 31.68 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.0002 | 1 | 0.0002 | 1.68 | 0.32 |
|
| 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.75 | 0.47 |
|
| 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 75.00 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 12.00 | 0.07 |
|
| 0.0006 | 1 | 0.0006 | 4.68 | 0.16 |
|
| 0.005 | 1 | 0.005 | 43.34 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.002 | 1 | 0.002 | 21.77 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.005 | 1 | 0.005 | 41.17 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.0003 | 1 | 0.0003 | 2.77 | 0.23 |
| Lack of fit | 0.005 | 10 | 0.0005 | 3.89 | 0.22 |
| Pure error | 0.0002 | 2 | 0.0001 | ||
| Total | 0.10 | 26 |
R2 = 0.95
Fig. 2Contour plots and response surface plot showing the F/2 nutrients effect on total chlorophylls production
Fig. 3Contour plots and response surface plot showing the F/2 nutrients effect on carotenoids production
Analysis of variance of the model for starch production
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.021 | 1 | 0.021 | 29.76 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.0006 | 1 | 0.0006 | 0.96 | 0.43 |
|
| 0.0027 | 1 | 0.0027 | 3.85 | 0.19 |
|
| 0.0006 | 1 | 0.0006 | 0.96 | 0.43 |
|
| 0.0240 | 1 | 0.0240 | 34.32 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.14 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.0132 | 1 | 0.0132 | 18.89 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.0025 | 1 | 0.0025 | 3.57 | 0.19 |
|
| 0.0049 | 1 | 0.0049 | 7.00 | 0.11 |
|
| 0.0036 | 1 | 0.0036 | 5.14 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.005 | 1 | 0.005 | 7.24 | 0.11 |
|
| 0.004 | 1 | 0.004 | 6.66 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.000004 | 1 | 0.000004 | 0.005 | 0.95 |
|
| 0.00002 | 1 | 0.00002 | 0.03 | 0.87 |
| Lack of Fit | 0.0095 | 10 | 0.00095 | 1.35 | 0.50 |
| Pure error | 0.0014 | 2 | 0.0007 | ||
| Total | 0.093 | 26 |
R2 = 0.88
Fig. 4Contour plots and response surface plot showing the F/2 nutrients effect on starch production
Fig. 5FT-IR spectra for Tetraselmis sp. (a) Tetraselmis sp. cultivated under standard medium culture (factors at zero levels), (b) Tetraselmis sp. cultivated under optimized medium culture for starch production
Starch production in different microalgae under different culture conditions, as reported in the literature
| Microalgae | Stress conditions | Starch content (% of DW) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| –P (low ICD) | 44.1 | [ |
|
| –P (medium ICD) | 42.2 | [ |
|
| –N | 54.0 | [ |
|
| –N | 41 | [ |
|
| –N | 37 | [ |
|
| –P | 53 | [ |
|
| Optimized F/2 medium | 42.3 | This study |