Literature DB >> 28218967

Representation of critical natural capital in China.

Yihe Lü1,2,3, Liwei Zhang4, Yuan Zeng5, Bojie Fu1,2,3, Charlotte Whitham6, Shuguang Liu7, Bingfang Wu5.   

Abstract

Traditional means of assessing representativeness of conservation value in protected areas depend on measures of structural biodiversity. The effectiveness of priority conservation areas at representing critical natural capital (CNC) (i.e., an essential and renewable subset of natural capital) remains largely unknown. We analyzed the representativeness of CNC-conservation priority areas in national nature reserves (i.e., nature reserves under jurisdiction of the central government with large spatial distribution across the provinces) in China with a new biophysical-based composite indicator approach. With this approach, we integrated the net primary production of vegetation, topography, soil, and climate variables to map and rank terrestrial ecosystems capacities to generate CNC. National nature reserves accounted for 6.7% of CNC-conservation priority areas across China. Considerable gaps (35.2%) existed between overall (or potential) CNC representativeness nationally and CNC representation in national reserves, and there was significant spatial heterogeneity of representativeness in CNC-conservation priority areas at the regional and provincial levels. For example, the best and worst representations were, respectively, 13.0% and 1.6% regionally and 28.9% and 0.0% provincially. Policy in China is transitioning toward the goal of an ecologically sustainable civilization. We identified CNC-conservation priority areas and conservation gaps and thus contribute to the policy goals of optimization of the national nature reserve network and the demarcation of areas critical to improving the representativeness and conservation of highly functioning areas of natural capital. Moreover, our method for assessing representation of CNC can be easily adapted to other large-scale networks of conservation areas because few data are needed, and our model is relatively simple.
© 2017 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  biophysical assessment; conservation gaps; escala espacial; establecimiento de prioridades; planeación sistemática de la conservación; priority setting; spatial scale; systematic conservation planning; vacíos de conservación; valoración biofísica

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28218967     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa's protected area network.

Authors:  Fangli Wei; Shuai Wang; Bojie Fu; Yanxu Liu
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  China's ecological conservation redline: A solution for future nature conservation.

Authors:  Jixi Gao; Yan Wang; Changxin Zou; Delin Xu; Naifeng Lin; Lixia Wang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.