Literature DB >> 30852776

Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa's protected area network.

Fangli Wei1,2, Shuai Wang3, Bojie Fu1,4, Yanxu Liu4.   

Abstract

The dramatic increase in anthropogenic activity severely threatens the biodiversity and life-support services that underpin human well-being. The broadened focus of protecting ecosystem services (ESs) better aligns the interests of people and biodiversity conservation. In this study, we used species richness as a surrogate for biodiversity and mapped the key ESs in East Africa with the goal to assess the spatial congruence between biodiversity and ESs, and evaluate the representation of current protected areas (PAs) network for biodiversity and ESs. The results showed that PAs well represented for species richness and regulating services but underrepresented for provisioning services. The PAs network occupies 10.96% of East Africa's land surface, and captures 20.62-26.37% of conservation priorities for vertebrate and plant species. It encompasses more than 16.23% of priority areas for three regulating services, but only 6.17% and 5.22% for crop and livestock production, respectively. Strong correlations and high overlaps exist between species richness and regulating services, particularly for carbon storage, water yield and plants. Thus, we believe that actions taken to conserve biodiversity also will protect certain ESs, which in turn will create new incentives and funding sources for the conservation of biodiversity. Overall, our results have wide-ranging policy implications and can be used to optimize conservation strategies for both biodiversity and multiple ESs in East Africa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Conservation priority area; East Africa; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem services; Protected areas (PAs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852776      PMCID: PMC6888792          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  24 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity.

Authors:  Ana S L Rodrigues; Sandy J Andelman; Mohamed I Bakarr; Luigi Boitani; Thomas M Brooks; Richard M Cowling; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Gustavo A B Da Fonseca; Kevin J Gaston; Michael Hoffmann; Janice S Long; Pablo A Marquet; John D Pilgrim; Robert L Pressey; Jan Schipper; Wes Sechrest; Simon N Stuart; Les G Underhill; Robert W Waller; Matthew E J Watts; Xie Yan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation.

Authors:  P R Armsworth; K M A Chan; G C Daily; P R Ehrlich; C Kremen; T H Ricketts; M A Sanjayan
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 3.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities.

Authors:  R Naidoo; A Balmford; R Costanza; B Fisher; R E Green; B Lehner; T R Malcolm; T H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation.

Authors:  Clinton N Jenkins; Stuart L Pimm; Lucas N Joppa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: Balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa.

Authors:  R S Reid; D Nkedianye; M Y Said; D Kaelo; M Neselle; O Makui; L Onetu; S Kiruswa; N Ole Kamuaro; P Kristjanson; J Ogutu; S B BurnSilver; M J Goldman; R B Boone; K A Galvin; N M Dickson; W C Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A human-driven decline in global burned area.

Authors:  N Andela; D C Morton; L Giglio; Y Chen; G R van der Werf; P S Kasibhatla; R S DeFries; G J Collatz; S Hantson; S Kloster; D Bachelet; M Forrest; G Lasslop; F Li; S Mangeon; J R Melton; C Yue; J T Randerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  To what extent can ecosystem services motivate protecting biodiversity?

Authors:  Laura E Dee; Michel De Lara; Christopher Costello; Steven D Gaines
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Reply to Bridgewater and Babin: Need for a new protected area category for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Weihua Xu; Yi Xiao; Jingjing Zhang; Wu Yang; Lu Zhang; Vanessa Hull; Zhi Wang; Hua Zheng; Jianguo Liu; Stephen Polasky; Ling Jiang; Yang Xiao; Xuewei Shi; Enming Rao; Fei Lu; Xiaoke Wang; Gretchen C Daily; Zhiyun Ouyang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development.

Authors:  Heather Tallis; Peter Kareiva; Michelle Marvier; Amy Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the European scale.

Authors:  Catharina J E Schulp; Benjamin Burkhard; Joachim Maes; Jasper Van Vliet; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program.

Authors:  Xutong Wu; Shuai Wang; Bojie Fu
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 6.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.