Literature DB >> 28216399

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Novel Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screw: Preliminary 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study.

Louis H Rappoport1, Ingrid Y Luna2, Gita Joshua2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Proper diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain remains a clinical challenge. Dysfunction of the SIJ can produce pain in the lower back, buttocks, and extremities. Triangular titanium implants for minimally invasive surgical arthrodesis have been available for several years, with reputed high levels of success and patient satisfaction. This study reports on a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw for surgical treatment of SIJ pain.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 32 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive SIJ fusion with a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw. Clinical assessments and radiographs were collected and evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 55.2 ± 10.7 years, and 62.5% were female. More patients (53.1%) underwent left versus right SIJ treatment, mean operative time was 42.6 ± 20.4 minutes, and estimated blood loss did not exceed 50 mL. Overnight hospital stay was required for 84% of patients, and the remaining patients needed a 2-day stay (16%). Mean preoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores decreased significantly by 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). Mechanical stability was achieved in 93.3% (28/30) of patients, and all patients who were employed preoperatively returned to work within 3 months. Two patients who required revision surgery reported symptom improvement within 3 weeks and did not require subsequent surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive clinical outcomes are reported 1 year postoperatively after implantation of a novel implant to treat sacroiliac joint pain. Future clinical studies with larger samples are warranted to assess long-term patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SI joint fusion; Sacroiliac joint; Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28216399     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  9 in total

1.  Sacroiliac joint stabilization using implants provide better fixation in females compared to males: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amin Joukar; Ali Kiapour; Anoli Shah; Ardalan Seyed Vosoughi; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Editor's Introduction: Update on Current Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures: Implications for Appropriate Current Procedural Terminology Medical Coding.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Surgical Treatments.

Authors:  Amin Joukar; Ali Kiapour; Hossein Elgafy; Deniz U Erbulut; Anand K Agarwal; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 5.  The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aazad Abbas; Jin Tong Du; Jay Toor; Anne Versteeg; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Lucas Haase; Paul A Lender; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-10

7.  Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw: final 2-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Louis H Rappoport; Kim Helsper; Torrey Shirk
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

8.  Pelvic orthosis effects on posterior pelvis kinematics An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefan Klima; Ronny Grunert; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared with sham operation: study protocol of a prospective double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Engelke Marie Randers; Paul Gerdhem; Jon Dahl; Britt Stuge; Thomas Johan Kibsgård
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.