Literature DB >> 32699758

Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Surgical Treatments.

Amin Joukar1, Ali Kiapour1,2, Hossein Elgafy1, Deniz U Erbulut1, Anand K Agarwal1, Vijay K Goel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fixation is one of the most common surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic pain originating from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). Many studies have investigated the clinical outcomes and biomechanics of various SIJ surgical procedures. However, the biomechanical literature points to several issues that need to be further explored, especially for the devices used in minimally invasive surgery of the SIJ. This study (part II) aims to assess biomechanical literature to understand the existing information as it relates to efficacies of the surgical techniques and the gaps in the knowledge base. Part I reviewed basic anatomy and mechanics of the SIJ joint, including difference between males and females, and causes of pain emanating from these joints.
METHODS: A thorough literature review was performed pertaining to studies related to SIJ fixation techniques and the biomechanical outcomes of the surgical procedures.
RESULTS: Fifty-five studies matched the search criteria and were considered for the review. These articles predominantly pertained to the biomechanical outcomes of the minimally invasive surgery with different instrumentation systems and surgical settings.
CONCLUSIONS: The SIJ is one of the most overlooked sources of lower back pain. The joint is responsible for the pain in 15% to 30% of people suffering from lower back pain. Various studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of different surgical procedures intended to improve the pain and quality of life following surgery. The data show that these techniques are indeed effective. However, clinical studies have raised several issues, like optimal number and positioning of implants, unilateral versus bilateral placements, adjacent segment disease, implant designs, and optimal location of implants with respect to variations in bone density across the SIJ. Biomechanical studies using in vitro and in silico techniques have addressed some of these issues. Studies also point out the need for additional investigations for a better understanding of the underlying mechanics for the improved long-term surgical outcomes. Further long-term clinical follow-ups are essential as well. This review presents pertinent findings. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; devices; low back pain; minimally invasive; sacroiliac fixation; sacroiliac joint; surgical procedures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699758      PMCID: PMC7343255          DOI: 10.14444/7047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  49 in total

1.  Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Ali Kiapour; Scott A Yerby; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

2.  Sacroiliitis: MR imaging findings.

Authors:  M D Murphey; L H Wetzel; J M Bramble; E Levine; K M Simpson; H B Lindsley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A C Schwarzer; C N Aprill; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of lordosis angle change after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion on sacrum angular displacement: a finite element study.

Authors:  Ningfang Mao; Jian Shi; Dawei He; Yang Xie; Yushu Bai; Xianzhao Wei; Zhicai Shi; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Sex Specific Sacroiliac Joint Biomechanics During Standing Upright: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Amin Joukar; Anoli Shah; Ali Kiapour; Ardalan Seyed Vosoughi; Bradley Duhon; Anand K Agarwal; Hossein Elgafy; Nabil Ebraheim; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Function and pathomechanics of the sacroiliac joint. A review.

Authors:  R L DonTigny
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1985-01

8.  Assessment of Biomechanical Changes After Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Application of the 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Technique.

Authors:  Je Hoon Jeong; Jeremi M Leasure; Jon Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  A Retrospective Outcomes Study of 20 Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Patients.

Authors:  Carter E Beck; Saskia Jacobson; Eamon Thomasson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-04-01

10.  Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Arnold Graham Smith; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher; Leonard Rudolf; Donald Sachs; Mukund Gundanna; Jeffrey Kleiner; Milan G Mody; A Nick Shamie
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2013-10-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation.

Authors:  Roxanne Dubé-Cyr; Carl-Éric Aubin; Isabelle Villemure; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-03-23

2.  Sacroiliac joint stabilization using implants provide better fixation in females compared to males: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amin Joukar; Ali Kiapour; Anoli Shah; Ardalan Seyed Vosoughi; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.